http
://www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/340/feb02_4/c644
Re: Did retracting the paper matter?
Did retracting the paper matter?
4 March 2010
F. Edward Yazbak,
Pediatrician
Falmouth, Massacusetts 02540
Send response to journal:
Re: Did retracting the paper matter?
It is clear that many were pleased when the Lancet retracted “the paper”. The
question is: Did that accomplish much? Did it change the fact that "Ileal-lymphoid-nodular
hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in
children" are related? Did it wipe out the brilliant observation by the GI team
at the Royal Free that a gut- brain connection existed? The answer is obviously
NO.
Dr. Wakefield, Professor Simon Murch and others elaborated further on the
autism-related gastro-intestinal findings when they published a review article
in 2002, titled “The concept of entero-colonic encephalopathy, autism and opioid
receptor ligands”. The authors proposed that it was plausible that exogenous,
gut-derived neurotoxins entered the systemic circulation “during a critical
window of vulnerability”, damaged the central nervous system and caused autism.
They also mentioned that the gut-brain axis is central to certain
encephalopathies and that opioid peptides may mediate some aspects of autism.
Most importantly, they gave hope to the rapidly increasing population of parents
with affected children by pointing out that modification of the diet was likely
to reduce the toxicity of certain opioids and improve symptoms.
Obviously Wakefield’s opponents were not too happy. They went on discrediting
his theory that the brain injury and deficits in regressive autism were related
to very specific GI findings and they claimed that his findings had not been
reproduced by others, when indeed they were in multiple centers in the U.S. They
also never mentioned how effective the gluten-free and casein-free diets were in
improving symptoms in many affected children.
In late 2009, just when the GMC was getting ready to reveal its “verdict”, a
team from Norway published an important and very carefully conducted study. At
any other time, the reported findings would have and should have caused
world-wide interest. They did not, probably because they would have vindicated
Wakefield and shown that the GMC was “on a collision course with reality” as a
good friend put it.
In a review article titled "The possibility and probability of a gut- to-brain
connection in autism" and published in the Annals of Clinical Psychiatry,
Reichelt and Knivsberg reported that “In autistic syndromes, we can show marked
increases in UV 215-absorbing material eluting after hippuric acid that are
mostly peptides. We also show highly significant decreases after introducing a
gluten- and casein-free diet with a duration of more than 1 year. We refer to
previously published studies showing improvement in children on this diet who
were followed for 4 years and a pairwise matched, randomly assigned study with
highly significant changes.”
The authors added that the literature now showed abundant data pointing to the
importance of a gut-to-brain connection in autism and concluded: “An effect of
diet on excreted compounds and behavior has been found. A gut-to-brain axis is
both possible and probable.”
The Lancet paper didn’t matter after all!
Competing interests: Grandfather of a child with regressive autism