Polly Tommey
Web: Autism file
Producer: [2016 April. Film] Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe
[vid] Vaccination How Dare You Cripple, Maim And Murder The Minds Of Our Children! Published on 4 Jul 2016. http://www.StopMandatoryVaccination.com - Polly Tommey, producer of Vaxxed: From Cover-Up To Catastrophe, goes after bully pediatricians and the authors of the California mandatory vaccination bill SB277 in this rebel rousing July 1st protest speech. She calls out pediatricians who know that vaccines maim and kill yet don’t vaccinate their own children. She says that vaccine mandates will murder more babies.
Articles
[2016 Dec] Mercury, Vaccines and the CDC's
Worst Nightmare By Rita Shreffler
[vid 2011 May] Epidemic of Autistics Going to Jail - Lisa Blakemore Brown Polly Tommey interviews Lisa Blakemore Brown who describes how Autistics are going to prison in epidemic proportions.
[2010 Jan] Polly Tommey of Autism File Magazine on "Discredited Defamation of Dr. Andrew Wakefield"
[2016 April. Film] Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe
Quotes
“The amount of dead babies… We’re speaking to parents, they tell us,
mainly from DTaP, that they were told by the doctor, if they didn’t get the
DTaP, then they were the worst parents in the world, and their children would
die—And these children did die, from the DTaP. And the parents have no voice
because their child died. There’s no society for them to have a voice. Children
that have died later on, adults that have died, flu vaccine, horrific stories
coming in from the Gardasil, and babies that that have died because they were
given far too many flu vaccines at a young age."
[2016 June] VaXxed Becomes a Cautionary Tale Of Vaccine Injury for All Americans
to Hear By Anne Dachel
[2010 Jan] Polly Tommey of Autism File Magazine on "Discredited Defamation of Dr. Andrew Wakefield"
At around the time of World Autism Awareness Day this year, I appeared with a colleague on the Wright Stuff television chat show on Channel 5. Before going on air, the host Matthew Wright joined us in the "green room" and said that he had been told by the show’s lawyers that if Dr. Wakefield’s name was mentioned, he had to say that Wakefield was "discredited." We questioned why, but Matthew said that he had no choice these were his lawyers’ instructions . . . .When I was on GMTV they said pretty much the same thing, and we have all read the same in many newspapers.[2010 Jan] Polly Tommey of Autism File Magazine on "Discredited Defamation of Dr. Andrew Wakefield" Specifically, I have been "warned" not to print any more articles written by Dr. Andrew Wakefield (he wrote for the first time in the last issue); I was also warned not to invite him to speak at our conference. Separately, some organizations have warned me that they will not have anything to do with me if I continue to support and publish papers by him. Some advertisers tell me they have to stop working with us as they are "under pressure" to pull out, and a number of celebrities, high earning individuals, journalists, scientists, practitioners, and people who want to contribute to the magazine or to our campaigns say that it’s more than their job’s worth to be associated with the work of this man more than their job’s worth to even listen to what he has to say. All of them say that they can’t support The Autism File if The Autism File appears to support Dr. Wakefield.
....In the days leading up to Deer’s initial "revelations" about Andrew
Wakefield and others in The Sunday Times in February 2004, a meeting took place
between Deer and Horton in which Deer made a number of claims. These all
centered on a paper written by Dr. Wakefield and colleagues, which was published
in The Lancet in 1998. In the now notorious paper, Wakefield et al. had
reported on a possibly novel form of bowel disease, with autistic-like
developmental regression, in 12 children referred to the gastrointestinal
department of London’s Royal Free Hospital. Eight of the children, according to
their parents or general practitioner, had the onset of developmental regression
soon after their MMR vaccine.
Despite what is usually inaccurately reported in summary, the
paper actually concluded that: "We did not prove an association between measles,
mumps and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described … further investigations
are needed to examine this syndrome and its possible relation to the vaccine."
In the February 2004 meeting, the major issues of relevance
to Dr. Horton were three specific claims made by Deer. First, he claimed that
The Lancet study was funded by Legal Aid money. Second, he claimed that
the children reported in The Lancet were sourced by lawyers. Third, and perhaps
most crucially, Deer claimed that Dr. Wakefield had hidden his involvement with
Dawbarns, the firm of lawyers involved in the MMR litigation, from The Lancet
and Dr. Horton.
On hearing these claims from Deer, Horton was apparently
horrified, and within hours of the meeting he stated publically that the 1998
paper was "fatally flawed." He further claimed that had The Lancet been
aware of Wakefield’s involvement with Dawbarns at that time the paper would
never have been published. This statement about the "fatally flawed" paper was,
therefore, the seed of the "discredited" myth that prevails and is clearly
influencing many more people today.
Let’s fast forward to the GMC hearing, which has been
investigating these claims for nearly three years. What do we find? First, it
has been demonstrated beyond doubt that The Lancet study was not
funded by Legal Aid. Not one penny of Legal Aid money was used for the study.
Second, it has been shown that the children in the study were not sourced by
lawyers. None of the children reported in The Lancet study were
involved in any legal action at the time of their referral to the Royal Free
Hospital. Third, we now know that The Lancet had been told, in communications
between Dawbarns and Horton, about Dr. Wakefield’s involvement with them in
April 1997. So, they knew. A whole year before the paper was published, they
knew. [2010 Jan] Polly Tommey of Autism
File Magazine on "Discredited Defamation of Dr. Andrew Wakefield"
At around the time of World Autism Awareness Day this year, I appeared with a colleague on the Wright Stuff television chat show on Channel 5. Before going on air, the host Matthew Wright joined us in the "green room" and said that he had been told by the show’s lawyers that if Dr. Wakefield’s name was mentioned, he had to say that Wakefield was "discredited." We questioned why, but Matthew said that he had no choice these were his lawyers’ instructions . . . .When I was on GMTV they said pretty much the same thing, and we have all read the same in many newspapers. [2010 Jan] Polly Tommey of Autism File Magazine on "Discredited Defamation of Dr. Andrew Wakefield"