[back] Swine flu vax Nano particles
" At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date."by F. William Engdahl
Part III: ‘It’s the vaccines, Stupid!
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15092
Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government
authorities for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have
been found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting
with nanoparticles as a way to “turbo charge” vaccines for several years. Now it
has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other European
countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks healthy cells
and can be deadly.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had
developed a “nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with
fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine
technologies.” The article went on to describe the effects of their
breakthrough: “At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that once
injected, they flow through the skin’s extracellular matrix, making a beeline to
the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they’ve reached a concentration of DCs
thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can then be
extremely strong and effective.” 1
There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticlesthey can
be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.
Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of
science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly
asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being
outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together with
the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent studies in
China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into the body. Once
they interact with the body’s cellular structure, they cannot be removed. Modern
medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a continuing infectious reaction.
Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a
millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate all
cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles are far
smaller than asbestos fibers.
Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans
The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German Robert
Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the population to be
injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing nanoparticles says more
about the powerful pharma lobby in European politics than it does about the
sanity or moral integrity of the civil servants responsible for health of the
general public.
The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made
public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a
peer-reviewed article with the title, “Exposure to nanoparticles is related to
pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma.”
The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing Chaoyang
Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been exposed to
nanoparticles for 5–13 months in their common workplace. All were admitted to
the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or excessive fluids
surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the seven had ever smoked
and none were in any special risk group. Doctors carefully tested for every
possibility and confirmed that the lung problems had a common originregular
inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory. They had been exposed to
Polyacrylat nanoparticles.
The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a “super-meltdown” reaction in
the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the seven died from
the lung complications. 2
In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is necessary
to quote at length:
“Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour markers,
bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic surgery were
performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and examinations of
the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of nanoparticles, was
confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of patients’ lung tissue
displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation, pulmonary fibrosis and
foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission electron microscopy,
nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm and caryoplasm of
pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also located in the chest
fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term exposure to some nanoparticles
without protective measures may be related to serious damage to human lungs.“3
To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can
result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the
clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study had
been made.
The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that
nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At this
point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass distributed
in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the relevant
responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an immediate
emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing nanoparticles can
only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence. Hopefully the responsible
authorities will react in time to avert a possible human health catastrophe
orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of Swine Flu reported to date.