http://www.thanhniennews.com/healthy/?catid=8&newsid=47330
March 24, 2009 11:35:33 Vietnam (GMT+07)
Almost no health risk from vaccination labeling errors
Merck Sharp & Dohme Asia (MSD) said they regretted a recent mistake printed on
their vaccines’ instructions, yet confirmed it posed very low risk to human
health at a press briefing Monday.
Representatives from the US-owned company cited international scientific reports
as saying there was almost no difference between injecting the measles, mumps
and Rubella vaccine into muscles and underneath the skin.
Early this month, a batch of the vaccine MMRII imported to Vietnam on February
11 was labeled with instructions saying “for intramuscular injection” rather
than “for subcutaneous injection” as normally prescribed.
Dr. Bui Thi Thanh Thuy from MSD cited a World Health Organization’s
epidemiological report in April, 2004 as saying the measles vaccine is generally
injected subcutaneously but also effective when administered intramuscularly.
She also quoted the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization
Practices, an agency under the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
In Europe, the vaccine is licensed to be used for both routes, Thuy said at the
briefing in Ho Chi Minh City with the participation of local experts, including
Professor Do Gia Canh from the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology.
“The risks posed to people receiving intramuscular injections of the vaccine are
very low,” she said.
Canh confirmed that both applications have the same immunogenicity and
side-effects.
Professor Pham Hoang Phiet from the HCMC University of Medicine and Pharmacy
agreed with Canh, saying only patients with blood diseases risked complications
when inoculated intramuscularly.
On March 9, MSD reported immediately to the Drug Administration of Vietnam about
the error after receiving a call from a preventive health center asking why the
vaccine’s label said to inject it into muscle while it is generally for
subcutaneous use, Thuy said.
About two thirds of the 40,000 vials of vaccine batch Lot K6572, however, had
already been consumed, MSD Chief Representative in Vietnam Kha My Linh, said.
“But we haven’t received any reports about the intramuscular use for the vaccine
from our customers,” Thuy said.
Doctors have probably continued injecting the vaccine under the skin despite the
labeling error, because they are in the habit of injecting the vaccine
underneath skin, according to Dr. Huynh Thi Duy Huong from the same university.
MSD representatives said this is the first time they had imported the vaccine
with all labels in Vietnamese as regulated by the Ministry of Health, adding
that only the label on the vial had the wrong information while the outer carton
and insert were correct.
Previously, only the insert was printed in Vietnamese, while the other packaging
was in English, according to Thuy.
Linh said MSD would follow ministry guidelines and at this point they had not
been asked to withdraw the batch from pharmacy shelves, but only to inform
related agencies of the error.
Since there was no difference in the two routes, the company should apply for
use of intramuscular injection, to avoid confusing the public, Huong urged.
“We will immediately apply for vaccination by intramuscular and subcutaneous
injection,” Linh said.
Merck Sharp & Dohme Asia Ltd. is a branch of Merck Sharp & Dohme in New Jersey,
US.
Reported by Thanh Nguyen