Somers, Suzanne Chemotherapy Persecuted doctors MAD (medically assisted death)
Attempted Murder: The Suzanne Somers Story
by HOWARD S. KATZ
http://thegoldspeculator.blogspot.com/2009/11/attempted-murder.html
(11-16-09) Facts have recently been reported which have convinced me that
certain members of the cancer establishment have tried to murder Suzanne
Somers.
Miss Somers was known to most Americans for her role as Chrissy Snow in "Three's
Company," the popular TV situation comedy of the 70s and 80s, which starred John
Ritter. More recently she has become known as a promoter of natural hormone
replacement therapy.
In the current (Dec. 2009) issue of Life Extension Magazine, editor William
Faloon writes:
"Earlier this year, actress Susanne Somers called me about a new book she felt
compelled to write. She had been hospitalized with an infection [probably valley
fever, a fungus in the soil of the American Southwest] but her doctors told her
she suffered from metastatic breast cancer that required immediate chemotherapy.
"Had Suzanne believed her doctors, they would have dumped toxic chemo drugs into
her body. She would then display classic signs/symptoms associated with cancer
chemotherapy such as immune impairment, nausea, hair loss, emaciation, etc.
"If Suzanne died from chemotherapy-induced complications, which was possible
since she suffered an infection that required her immune system to battle, her
doctors would have proclaimed that she died of metastatic breast cancer. Suzanne
wondered how many others perish this way at the hands of the cancer
establishment."
William Faloon, "As We See It," Life Extension Magazine,
Dec. 2009, p. 8.
As background, cancer was one of the most feared diseases of the 20th century.
Cancer deaths rose through the course of the century despite the fact that the
Government singled it out for a special effort. In 1971, President Nixon
declared war on cancer and announced the objective of curing the disease by
1980. (For younger readers, Americans used to think in terms of curing diseases
in the sense of totally wiping them out. A large number of diseases were cured
in this way in the early part of the 20th century, the last of which was polio.)
Cancer death rates now appear to have peaked in the early 1990s at just about
the time that the Government (here meaning the Food and Drug Administration)
suffered a major political defeat with the passage of the Health Freedom Act in
1994.
This forced the FDA to legalize a number of beneficial natural products, some
with anti-cancer effects. An example of this is melatonin, which is now
available over-the-counter and has proven its ability to combat cancer.
The only exception to this peak has been in female lung cancer, which rose
sharply from 1970 to 2005 as the feminist movement promoted smoking among women.
("You’ve come a long way baby.")
One of the incredible "blunders" of the war on cancer was the introduction of
female hormone replacement therapy. It was discovered that certain female
hormones had a positive effect in relieving many of the symptoms of menopause,
drugs imitating these hormones were created and these drugs were given to
millions of women over the past generation. More recently, scientific evidence
proved that these drugs were more harmful than helpful, and female hormone
therapy abruptly ceased.
However, at this time doctors who treat their patients by natural methods (as
opposed to drugs) reported that in their treatment of women with actual human
female hormones, instead of their drug or animal imitations, they observed only
the beneficial effects with none of the harmful ones. This is not a surprising
result because the exact same thing happened a generation back to men.
In the 1930s, the male hormone, testosterone, was discovered. Several drug
companies quickly manufactured drugs similar to testosterone. They would start
with the testosterone molecule, which is quite complex, alter a single atom or
chemical group and come up with a new substance, not found in nature, which had
many of the effects of testosterone. These testosterone-like substances were
then marketed to body-builder types. And then the body builders using them
started to die. The very small difference between the drug and the natural
product was enough to kill them. These drugs were then mislabeled anabolic
steroids and are today regarded as highly dangerous.
The problem with this is that the category anabolic steroid is too broad. The
drug anabolic steroids are fatal. The natural anabolic steroid, testosterone, is
very healthy and invigorating.
In one experiment, the testosterone levels of middle aged males were studied
over a 10 year period. Those men who were lowest in testosterone suffered a much
higher rate of heart attacks than the men highest in testosterone. Simply put,
the drugs kill; the natural substance promotes life. After discovering this
truth in regard to men, who are simpler in terms of hormones, the medical
establishment made the same "error" in regard to women.
Enter Suzanne Somers. When drug hormone replacement therapy for women was ended
because of its harmful effects, the medical establishment did not switch over to
natural hormone replacement.
With the exception of a small minority, the nation's doctors declared hormone
replacement (of all kinds) to be dangerous and ignored the proven benefits of
natural hormones. (In the male area, testosterone, after being initially
ignored, is now being positively slandered. For example, it is argued based on
some very shoddy science that testosterone promotes the spread of prostate
cancer. (For the scientific refutation of this point, see Life Extension
Magazine, Dec. 2008.)
NOTE TO READERS. THIS IS A GOOD INDICATION OF THE STATE OF AMERICAN MEDICINE.
YOUR LIFE MAY DEPEND ON EXACTLY WHOM YOU SELECT AS A DOCTOR, THE ESTABLISHMENT
DOCTOR WHO TREATS WITH DRUGS OR THE NATUROPATHIC DOCTOR WHO TREATS WITH NATURAL
SUBSTANCES.
Miss Somers played an airhead in "Three's Company," but she is a very
intelligent woman. She educated herself as to the benefits of natural hormone
replacement therapy, and over the past several years she has been making a noble
effort to educate the public about this exciting news. Unfortunately, in doing
this Miss Somers stepped on some very powerful toes.
In American medicine prior to the 20th century, almost all medicines were
natural products. The same is true for all societies for all of human history.
The great doctors of all time have highly praised natural medicine. Hippocrates,
whose oath doctors still take today, once declared, "Let your food be your
medicine and your medicine be your food."
But as government began to worm its way into 20th century western medicine,
events took a most evil turn. Basic American law (correctly) distinguishes
between patentable and non-patentable products.
If a product exists in nature, it cannot be patented, and anyone is free to use
it. However, if a product was created by the mental labor of a human being, then
that labor gives him the right to exclusive use of the product he has created.
And this right is protected by a patent or a copyright. For example, if a poet
writes a poem, he and he alone has the right to profit from it by printing up
copies and selling them.
All this was established in American law long ago and is fundamentally in accord
with justice. In 19th century America, patented products and unpatented products
both sold in competition with each other.
The unpatented were cheaper, and the patented claimed to be better. The
consuming public made the final decision. This basically good system, however,
was corrupted by the creation of the (modern) Food and Drug Administration in
1938.
The FDA quickly moved to violate the First Amendment rights of the manufacturers
of natural (non-patentable) products. Scientific proof of the effectiveness of a
medicine was redefined as that which is approved by the FDA, and FDA approval
was granted by a system of big money. The FDA would require a complicated
process of tests which were enormously expensive to perform. The proposition
under question might have been proven by an academic researcher who demonstrated
scientifically (and inexpensively) that the medicine in question worked.
However, the FDA always pretends that this scientific proof does not exist and
demands compliance with its expensive procedure. (The expensive procedure is
worthless because, incredibly, the companies are allowed to perform the tests on
their own product, and there is no effective way to stop them from cheating on
their tests.)
A company with a patentable product can easily afford to pay the cost of the FDA
tests. The patent gives it a monopoly, and this allows it to charge an absurdly
high price. In effect, it pays nothing for the tests because the money is made
up by the public. On the other hand, if a company makes a non-patentable product
and can come up with the money for the FDA tests and if the tests prove
effectiveness, then a competitor can come in and sell the same product for a
much lower price (because it will not have the cost of the tests).
Therefore, the original (non-patented) company would be undersold and driven out
of business. It would be foolish to do this, and therefore this system makes it
impossible to get FDA approval no matter how good the (non-patentable) product
is and how many lives it saves.
The history of drugs invented under this system is a giant series of disasters.
You have probably read a great deal of media hype about how wonderful drugs are.
These are lies, pure and simple. The human being is a creature of evolution.
Drugs are new substances on planet Earth, and humans have not had enough time to
evolve natural protections from or biological harmonies with them.
Thousands of chemical and electrical reactions are going on in the human body
all the time, and the chances are very great that the new drug will interfere
with one of these reactions and seriously injure or kill the patient. That is
the story of new drugs. They are released without sufficient testing for side
effects. Five, ten or even 30 years after release they turn out to have bizarre
or fatal side effects (sometimes showing up in the next generation). (Remember
Phen-fen?) Yet the vast majority of the sucker public takes these drugs because
all of their authority figures tell them they are safe.
(One fact has always underlined in my mind the importance of evolutionary
harmony. The original life form on earth was an anaerobic one celled animal. It
did not breathe oxygen. Indeed, to it oxygen was a deadly poison, and it
excreted oxygen in its normal metabolism. As this oxygen built up in the Earth’s
atmosphere, this one-called animal was slowly poisoning itself. Life on Earth
was about to destroy itself. Then, by an evolutionary accident, a creature
evolved to which oxygen was not a poison. This creature breathed in oxygen and
reduced the percentage of this gas in the atmosphere. Life on Earth was saved.
Life had found a way.)
The whole point of paying for health care via insurance is to make this sucker
public believe that these incredibly expensive drugs are free. ("It didn't cost
anything. The insurance paid for it.")
Thus most drugs do more harm with their dangerous side effects than good, but
they bring in huge profits for the drug companies. For this reason, the drug
companies pour out a constant stream of propaganda to the effect that natural
products do not work.
These lies are then backed up by the FDA because the drug companies have a
sophisticated system of bribery (legalized) in place, and the FDA usually backs
up everything they say.
The bans on tryptophan (which is essential for life) and ephedra (used safely in
China for 2000 years) are examples.
So when Suzanne Somers launched her campaign for natural hormone replacement
therapy for women (and men also), she ran into the incredible power of these
drug companies and those elements in the medical profession which have been
corrupted by them.
Go back and reread Mr. Faloon's report on her recent incident. She was diagnosed
as having a body full of highly advanced cancer (when in fact her only problem
was a simple fungal infection, probably valley fever).
After she refused chemotherapy, the cancer suddenly disappeared and was replaced
by an (equally fictitious) contagious disease. (Again because of government
invasion of our liberties, hospitals have been given the authority to hold a
patient prisoner if they diagnose a contagious disease.)
Chemotherapy is a highly dangerous treatment. It is almost as dangerous to the
patient as it is to the cancer (if one has cancer).
Jacqueline Onassis Kennedy was killed by an overdose of chemotherapy. If I were
on a jury, it would seem obvious to me that some of the doctors in that hospital
were deliberately trying to murder Suzanne Somers. They would remove a dedicated
enemy who was a substantial threat to their income (motive) and then cover it up
by claiming that she had died of cancer.
(One of Miss Somers' early triumphs occurred when she did contract cancer and
then cured herself by rejecting her doctors' advice and treating herself with
natural hormone replacement therapy. She was her own earliest success.) After
leaving the hospital (in 2008) with a huge basket of drugs, Miss Somers was told
by a doctor in whom she had confidence (Dr. Jonathan Wright):
"First of all, these drugs will kill you. Seriously, they are so toxic to the
body that I don't know what this doctor is thinking. Second, it is mandated by
law that these drugs not be given unless there is an absolute diagnosis, which
you do not have...these drugs have the potential to kill you or seriously injure
and debilitate your liver."
Dr. Jonathan
Wright, (speaking to
Susanne Somers), as
quoted in Knockout, by Suzanne Somers, (New York,
Crown, 2009), p. 16.
If you are looking for heroes in this evil age, then Suzanne Somers is a true
heroine. She is intelligent and courageous. She is fighting the battle for all
of us. When they tried to kill her, they were trying to kill you and me and a
great many of the American people.
Right now there is a movement trying to give more power to these evil people
(President Obama and the Democratic Party). Miss Somers has given us a rallying
point.
Because of her celebrity status she can get the attention that you or I cannot.
If we don't fight now, then, when things get more desperate and we have to
fight, we will fight from a weaker position. If the other fellow is trying to
kill you, then you have no choice.
The nation owes this brave woman a giant thank you.