Did you know that Ed Milliband,s brother,David, was appointed President and CEO of the International Rescue Committee who are responsible for coordinating and communicating the Ebola response in West Africa?

Milliband was the UK government minister responsible for the UK spy service MI6.

THE INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE

The IRC are the group conveying to the African Government and health departments, how many have Ebola, the fact that other diseases mimic the symptoms of Ebola ,even the hemorrhaging symptom, means that untold cases are being reported as Ebola, with no real clinical proof. An Interview with Nicole Walden of International Rescue Committee in Liberia, November 7, 2014 has her quoted as saying "the getting labs and lab technologies available to – to see whether that person died from Ebola or from something else. We’ve haven’t – we’ve been slow to get there. The labs are coming online now. We’ve got far greater lab capacity than we ever did before. And so we are going to be able to make better determinations about whether someone in fact is Ebola positive or it’s another virus or another illness."

( So, even four months ago, the IRC admit that they do not know how many actually died of Ebola and yet the WHO claimed Ebola a public health emergency in August, in doing so they  discounted the assessment of its own Ebola expert, Dr Pierre Formenty, who was best informed about the outbreak. In a press briefing in Geneva on June 27th --just five weeks before the declaration WHO media spokesperson Glenn Thomas introduced WHO's Ebola expert Dr Pierre Formenty. In response to aggressive  questioning from reporters and Doctors without Borders, Dr Formenty categorically denied that Ebola was "out of control" ( Glenn Thomas was reported to have been one of the passengers on the missing flight)(Link provided) 

If you look at the history of the IRC, who, incidentally have been active in all three hotspots in Africa for over a decade, you will find that they were founded in the 1930s, by the 1950s it had been absorbed into the American foreign policy establishment.
Throughout the Cold War, the IRC was deeply involved in the volatile confrontations between the two superpowers and participated in an array of sensitive clandestine operations. The IRC thus evolved from a small organization of committed activists to a global operation functioning as one link in the CIA’s covert network.

  By October, 2014, Ebola had laid claim to what some say is 3,000-plus deaths since its February outbreak, certainly this ought to be weighed in the light of the approximately 600,000 Africans killed by TB in the same time-frame. Curiously,the CDC failed to include TB in their short-list of possibilities that could cause Ebola-like symptoms nor have they taken into account how  this impacted Ebola statistics? Tuberculosis, which has its own viral-like forms, some of which can simulate the Ebola.

By the 1950,s the International Rescue Committee had become intimately involved in a series of highly secret covert operations.
As it grew and developed, the IRC became increasingly tied to the intelligence community; during the first years of the Cold War, it coordinated a series of highly sensitive covert operations directed at the Soviet bloc countries. After 1953, the Committee became an integral component of the psychological and political warfare programs conducted by the CIA.Now, you may be thinking, what have they got to gain by exaggerating the  numbers, at this point it might be important to know that the manipulation of statistics regarding conflicts is often carried out by the same persons that stand to gain from its continuation.The U.N. used a report by the International Rescue Committee (IRC) as the basis for its claims that a staggering 5.4 million people have died in the DRC as a result of the 1998 war and subsequent instability which was later found to be twice as many as the real figure. (Granted this is still a lot of lives lost, but, this proves that data has been manipulated to exaggerate a crisis previously and the U.N. have been willing to accept the Congo death toll estimate from the IRC without verification in order to “justify ramping up the UN presence in the country) Now, when we look at who is actually behind the IRC, it becomes apparent that there is a definite conflict of interests and a link to  Government foreign policy. The board includes Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Pfizer and secretary of the US treasury while the over-seers include the Chairman of Pepsi, Former US Sec of State, Condoleezza Rice, Former President of the World Bank, Madeleine Allbright, President of the UN, Kroll Associates, Former Sec of US Treasury, Tom Brokaw NBS news, Senior VP of Bank of America, HRH Princess of Jordan, Greenberg’s and Henry Kissinger.

WHO

The World Health Organization has played a huge part in the Ebola claims and agenda, but how trustworthy is this organization and who is behind it?

We need to be absolutely certain that the advice of such experts is based on solid scientific evidence and is driven solely by the need to protect public health. The only way to do that is through total transparency.Is it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing  vaccines?

A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning.

A third of the experts advising the World Health Organisation about the swine flu pandemic had ties to drugs firms, it has emerged.

Five of the 15 specialists who sat on the emergency committee had received funding from pharmaceutical giants, or were linked to them through their research.

This revelation shows  that the ‘pandemic’ was wildly overestimated and largely fuelled by the drugs industry who stood to benefit from the panic.

In 2010, it  emerged that the Government had squandered more than £1.2 billion tackling swine flu – most of it going towards vaccines following experts’ dire predictions that as many as 65,000 Britons would die.

In fact the virus claimed just 457 lives – a third of those killed every year by ordinary seasonal flu.

But today it emerged that many of the scientists on the WHO’s emergency panel had links with firms including GlaxoSmithKline, who made millions manufacturing swine flu vaccines .Gerd Gigerenzer, director of the Centre for Adaptive Behaviour and Cognition at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, told the BMJ/The Bureau:" There was no scientific basis for the WHO’s estimate of 2 billion for likely H1N1 cases, and we knew little about the benefits and harms of the vaccination. The WHO maintained this 2 billion estimate even after the winter season in Australia and New Zealand showed that only about one to two out of 1000 people were infected."

One of the board members of the WHO, Prof Anne Kelso is also a MAJOR shareholder in CSL Ltd,CSL is a global biotherapy company that makes many pharmaceuticals and vaccines. CSL is one of the worlds largest producers of named branded vaccines that are scheduled and injected in people around the world today. Gardasil, Fluvax,M-M-R II and others are among the long list of their products. Their flu vaccines are widely sold in the US and other countries.

The World Health Organization was promoting an industry by this 2012 pdf document.http://eboladeception.com/members-profit-pushing-vaccine-agenda/

Report of an advisory panel to WHO on the ethics of unregistered interventions was carried out by WHO in November 2014,UK Professor. Peter G Smith. He is not only on the Advisory committee for the WHO but also for the UK Government. He serves as Chair of the Programme Board for Global Health and Vaccination Research, Governor of the Wellcome Trust,member of the Partnership Board of the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership.He is also an ex board member of MMV, medicines malaria venture who,s ex board members include the supposed Ebola founder, Peter Poit and the new Ebola czar Dr David Nabarro.

Another member of the Advisory board is Dr Marion Danis, who is a senior member of the NIH, now, given that NIH and GSK are jointly making the Ebola vaccine,WHO failed to disclose that several of WHO s Ebola emergency declaration advisors have links to pharmaceuticual companies which should have disqualified them from participation in matters concerning an Ebola declaration which directs substantial contracts to pharmaceutical companies

. For example, Sam Zaramba, who lists on the Mectizan Expert Committee sponsored by GSK and Merck and who has participated in meetings sponsored by GSK and Merck.http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/130997/1/WHO_HIS_KER_GHE_14.1_eng.pdf?ua=1
https://birdflu666.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/ebola_vaccines_open_letter-pdf.pdf

Evidence of WHO involvement in cover-ups in pandemics;http://eboladeception.com/evidence-corruption-w-h-o-pandemics/investigation has identified key scientists involved in WHO pandemic planning who had declarable interests, some of whom are or have been funded by pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were drafting


The World Health Organization held a meeting in Geneva, January 25, 2015.Claiming that an independent advisory body will decide in August at the earliest on whether to recommend widespread introduction of an Ebola vaccine, depending on results of clinical trials and the epidemic’s course.
WHO spokeswoman Margaret Harris said: “We know the vaccines are safe, we know they produce a good immunogenic response in humans, but we don’t know if they are effective when you actually have disease in community.” How can they possibly know when a standard vaccine undergoes three clinical trials under the traditional approach and takes on average 10.71 years to develop. Also, a vaccine only has a 6% chance of entering the market. Drugs can take 10 to 15 years to develop with 95% failure risk at point of discovery. 

Why was a WHO meeting on Ebola Vaccine Trials, on December 15th, in which African countries scheduled to participate in the Ebola trial appear to

have asked for more safety data before proceeding with clinical phase 2 trials overrode in a WHO meeting on financing the Ebola vaccines on January 8th, by 19 representatives from the UK government and two from GSK?

Why did the WHO claim in a Special Session of the Executive Board on Ebola,Geneva, Switzerland,25 January 2015 that " The disease was unexpected and unfamiliar to everyone, from clinicians and laboratory staff to governments and their citizens."
This is a blatant lie and the WHO should be under investigation for their part in pushing this vaccine agenda.$83,978,960 has been spent by the USA Government alone  in funding to many labs, Universities etc from 2004 to 2013, on behalf of Government agencies such asDept of Defense, NIH, CDC, DHHS specific to Ebola.
http://www.usaspending.gov/search?form_fields={%22search_term%22%3A%22ebola%22%2C%22spending_cat%22%3A[]%2C%22fyear%22%3A[%222004%22%2C%222006%22%2C%222005%22%2C%222012%22%2C%222010%22%2C%222013%22%2C%222011%22%2C%222009%22%2C%222007%22%2C%222008%22]%2C%22dept%22%3Anull%2C%22extent_competed%22%3Anull%2C%22recipient_duns%22%3Anull%2C%22psc_code%22%3Anull%2C%22naics_code%22%3Anull}&sort_by=date&per_page=25

In fact,NIH and Crucell had a vaccine patented in 2005! http://www.freepatentsonline.com/WO2006037038A1.html So all this talk of this disease being unfamiliar is an obvious lie!
The National Institute of Health had been working on several Ebola vaccines in their labs since 2003 and before.* Ebola was patented by the U.S. Government in 2009.}http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6984504.html This shows the proof that the US army have known the method to protect against Ebola since 2003! 

What about the Labs that were already there? DoD is listed as a collaborator in a ‘First in Human’ Ebola clinical trial (NCT02041715, which started in January 2014 shortly before an Ebola epidemic was declared in West Africa in March 2014.

A UN document exists that shows a meeting held specifically to exploit the resources of Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea in 2013 prior to the reported outbreak.
A high level meeting called ' Power Africa ' was held in Washington including the organisers who are the Corporate Council on Africa, CCA,the vice president is 
Ambassador Perry, Council on Foreign Relations. They discussed Ebola on 26-2-15 with Pharmaceutical executives. The CCA is funded by taxpayers but involves 90 private sector companies including 30+ energy companies and many Govt agencies. The CCA website states that Africa presents the most untapped  power market in the world including access to to oil,gas and mineral exploitation.
So, you do the maths!
A.Carey Facebook group https://www.facebook.com/groups/794657180557181/?ref=bookmarks

All links can be found at : http://eboladeception.com/