Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
Alexander Solzhenitsyn on 'The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion"
The Elders of Zion and the Masters Discourse
(israelshamir.net) -- By Israel Shamir --
...The Anonymous author of the Protocols describes a master-plan for vast
restructuring of society, creation of a new oligarchy and subjugation of
millions. The final product is not too different from the one described in a
contemporary piece of writing, The Iron Heel by Jack London, the great radical
from Oakland, California. However, London expected harsh cracking down, while
Anonym’s way to subjugation leads through Machiavellian manipulations and mind
control a la Orwell’s 1984. (Orwell’s homage to the Protocols is even more
striking as it is rarely noticed).
The difficulty of the Protocols is in an uncanny dissonance between its uncouth
language and deep social and religious thought. It is a rude parody-like
rendering of a satanic, subtle and well-thought out plan, wrote the Nobel Prise
winning novelist Alexander Solzhenitsyn[5] in his (written in 1966 and published
in 2001) analysis of the Protocols.
“The Protocols … show a blueprint of a social system. Its design is well above
abilities of an ordinary mind, including that of its publisher. It is a dynamic
process of two stages, of destabilization, increasing freedom and liberalism,
which is terminated in social cataclysm, and on the second stage, new
hierarchical restructuring of society takes place. It is more complicated than a
nuclear bomb. It could be a stolen and distorted plan designed by a mind of
genius. Its putrid style of an anti-Semitic grubby brochure [intentionally]
obscures the great strength of thought and insight”.
Solzhenitsyn is aware of faults of the Protocols. “Its style is that of a filthy
leaflet, the powerful line of thought is broken and fragmented, mixed up with
ill-smelling incantations and psychological blunders. The system described is
not necessarily connected with the Jews; it could be purely Masonic or whatever;
while its strongly anti-Semitic current is not an organic part of the design”.
Solzhenitsyn makes a textual experiment, removes words “Jews”, “Goyim” and
“conspiracy” and finds many disturbing ideas. He concludes: “The text
demonstrates impressive foresight on the two systems of society, the Western and
the Soviet one. While a strong thinker could possibly predict the development of
the West in 1901, how could he grasp the Soviet future?”
Solzhenitsyn braved the Soviet regime, dared to write and publish the mammoth
Archipelago Gulag, an indictment of the Soviet repression, but even he stalled
and did not publish his research of the Protocols. He asked it to be published
after his death only, and it was printed against his will in a very small number
of copies in 2001. Let us follow Solzhenitsyn’s line of thought and gaze into
the crystal ball of the Protocols, while temporarily discounting its “Jewish
line” and paying heed to the idea of creating a new system, not necessarily a
Jewish-dominated one. The master-plan begins with reshaping of human mind:
“People’s minds should be diverted (away from contemplation) towards industry
and trade, and then they will have no time to think. The people will be consumed
by the pursuit of gain. It will be vain pursuit, for we shall put industry on a
speculative basis: what is withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through
the hands of workers and industrialists and pass into the hands of financiers.
The intensified struggle for survival and superiority, accompanied by crises and
shocks will create cold and heartless communities with strong aversion towards
religion. Their only guide is gain that is Mammon, which they will erect into a
veritable cult”.
Foresight of Anonym is amazing: in the days of the Protocols’ publication, Man
was still the measure of things, and full eighty years would pass, until Milton
Friedman and Chicago School would proclaim Market and Profit as the only guiding
light.
The tool for enslavement of minds is the media, writes Anonym. “There is a great
force that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is the media.
It is in the media that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation.
Through the Press we have gained the power to influence minds while remaining
unobserved. We shall erase from the memory of men the historical facts we do not
want them to know, and leave only those we wish”...
The Protocols identify the moving force of the New World Order with a powerful
group of extremely chauvinist, manipulative and domination-obsessed Jewish
leaders. The leaders, according to the Protocols, despise ordinary community
members; they utilise and support anti-Semitism as the means to keep their
“lesser brethren”, innocent ordinary folk of Jewish origin, in thrall to their
rule. The leaders are described as pathological goy haters, bent on destroying
culture and traditions of other nations while preserving their own. Their goal
is to create world government and rule the homogenised and globalised world.
Their aims and intentions are stated in extremely contrarian and obnoxious way.
Solzhenitsyn concluded that no sane person would deliver his favourite ideas in
such self-demeaning and self-defeating way. "We extract gold from their blood
and tears”, “our power is based on workers’ hunger”, “revolutionaries are our
human tools”, “brutish minds of Goyim” are, in his opinion, words ascribed to
the Jews by their enemies. A Jew would rather put such ideas in an oblique way,
he felt...
Solzhenitsyn does not believe in existence of the Elders of Zion, though “the
togetherness and coordination of Jewish activity for the sake of their
advancement caused many writers (beginning from Cicero) to imagine there is a
single commanding centre to direct their attacks”. “Without such a world centre,
without conspiring, the Jews understand each other and are able to coordinate
their actions”...
Self-interest explains the Jewish involvement with the dreaded Cheka, the Soviet
security services. Until 1937, the Jews occupied the top echelon of the KGB
predecessor body, while millions of Russians lost their life or liberty.
Objectively, these executioners made jobs and houses available for their fellow
Jews. After the massacre and exile of Russian elites, the Jews were ready for
equality, as a son of a Rabbi could easily compete with a son of Russian worker
or peasant, though he wouldn’t be able to compete with a son of Russian noble.
In a similar way, the Jews in Israel granted limited equality to the
Palestinians in 1966, after confiscation of 90% of native lands and expulsion of
90% of natives. Now, the settlers promise to extend equality to the rest of
Palestinians, after they will expel the majority of them elsewhere. In the light
of great Jewish support for Israel, there is no reason to presume that the
Jewish modus operandi in Palestine is intrinsically different from the Jewish
intentions abroad.
Solzhenitsyn writes: “Executed army officers were Russians, the noblemen,
priests, monks, deputies were Russians… In 1920s, the pre-revolutionary
engineers and scientists were exiled or killed. They were Russians, while their
place was taken by Jews. The best Russian Psychiatric institute in Moscow, its
Russian members were arrested or exiled, while their place was taken by the
Jews. Important Jewish doctors blocked the advancement of Russian medical
scientists… The best intellectual and artistic elites of Russian people were
killed, while the Jews grew and flourished in these (deadly for Russians) years”