Are Haiti's children being flown out to paedophiliacs with the knowledge and help of the UN and USA?
29 January 2010
Last week, Austria's ORF reported that planes with small children on board leave Haiti every day with the permission of the UN and the USA even though, as John Pilger notes in a report (below), the US military and UN have taken control of all airports, ports and roads in Haiti.
One airplane with 106 children aged between six months and seven years old from Haiti's capital was reported to have landed in Eindhoven in The Netherlands. The adoption agency, which organised the flight, told reporters that all the children apart from nine had new parents in the Netherlands and Luxemburg.
Haitian children are also being flown out in large numbers for adoption to to people in the US and Germany under the eyes of US and UN personnel.
But the Austrian government said that no one in Austria had applied for adoption, thereby underlining that adopting children has to follow a formal and lengthy procedure in normal cases?
Why is this procedure not being followed now? How can children be taken from Haiti before a thorough effort has been made to find any suriviving parents or relatives, something that could take months given the scale of the earthquake disaster. How can they be sent flown through airports guarded by the US and UN to people whose background has not been adequately checked and without an adequate monitoring system?
Why are these children not being given safe shelter in Haiti?
The extent to which the "power elites" indulge in paedophilia has been well documented by the case of Marc Dutroux in Belgium. Recently the French Minister of Culture Frederic Mitterand described in his autobiography paying Asian boys for sex.
The scale of paedophila today is well known.
The UN and WHO are not only vehicles of the climate change and swine flu scam. They have also become vehicles to supply the "elite" with helpless children for their paedophilic practises.
There should be an immediate prohibition on flying any children out of Haiti. The adoption agencies who are engaged in this business should be investigated by the police as should the people who have adopted children, and the children should be returned to Haiti.
The kidnapping of Haiti
John PIlger
http://www.johnpilger.com/page.asp?partid=564
In his latest column for the New Statesman, John Pilger describes the "swift
and crude" appropriation of earthquake-ravaged Haiti by the militarised Obama
administration. With George W. Bush attending to the "relief effort" and Bill
Clinton the UN's man, The Comedians, Graham Greene's dark novel about exploted
Haiti comes to mind.
The theft of Haiti has been swift and crude. On 22 January, the United States
secured “formal approval” from the United Nations to take over all air and sea
ports in Haiti, and to “secure” roads. No Haitian signed the agreement, which
has no basis in law. Power rules in an American naval blockade and the arrival
of 13,000 marines, special forces, spooks and mercenaries, none with
humanitarian relief training.
The airport in the capital, Port-au-Prince, is now an American military base and
relief flights have been re-routed to the Dominican Republic. All flights
stopped for three hours for the arrival of Hillary Clinton. Critically injured
Haitians waited unaided as 800 American residents in Haiti were fed, watered and
evacuated. Six days passed before the US Air Force dropped bottled water to
people suffering thirst and dehydration.
The first TV reports played a critical role, giving the impression of widespread
criminal mayhem. Matt Frei, the BBC reporter dispatched from Washington, seemed
on the point of hyperventilation as he brayed about the “violence” and need for
“security”. In spite of the demonstrable dignity of the earthquake victims, and
evidence of citizens’ groups toiling unaided to rescue people, and even an
American general’s assessment that the violence in Haiti was considerably less
than before the earthquake, Frei claimed that “looting is the only industry” and
“the dignity of Haiti’s past is long forgotten.” Thus, a history of unerring US
violence and exploitation in Haiti was consigned to the victims. “There’s no
doubt,” reported Frei in the aftermath of America’s bloody invasion of Iraq in
2003, “that the desire to bring good, to bring American values to the rest of
the world, and especially now to the Middle East... is now increasingly tied up
with military power.”
In a sense, he was right. Never before in so-called peacetime have human
relations been as militarised by rapacious power. Never before has an American
president subordinated his government to the military establishment of his
discredited predecessor, as Barack Obama has done. In pursuing George W. Bush’s
policy of war and domination, Obama has sought from Congress an unprecedented
military budget in excess of $700 billion. He has become, in effect, the
spokesman for a military coup.
For the people of Haiti the implications are clear, if grotesque. With US troops
in control of their country, Obama has appointed George W. Bush to the “relief
effort”: a parody surely lifted from Graham Greene’s The Comedians, set in Papa
Doc’s Haiti. As president, Bush’s relief effort following Hurricane Katrina in
2005 amounted to an ethnic cleansing of many of New Orleans’ black population.
In 2004, he ordered the kidnapping of the democratically-elected prime minister
of Haiti, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, and exiled him in Africa. The popular Aristide
had had the temerity to legislate modest reforms, such as a minimum wage for
those who toil in Haiti’s sweatshops.
When I was last in Haiti, I watched very young girls stooped in front of
whirring, hissing, binding machines at the Port-au-Prince Superior Baseball
Plant. Many had swollen eyes and lacerated arms. I produced a camera and was
thrown out. Haiti is where America makes the equipment for its hallowed national
game, for next to nothing. Haiti is where Walt Disney contractors make Mickey
Mouse pjamas, for next to nothing. The US controls Haiti’s sugar, bauxite and
sisal. Rice-growing was replaced by imported American rice, driving people into
the cities and towns and jerry-built housing. Years after year, Haiti was
invaded by US marines, infamous for atrocities that have been their specialty
from the Philippines to Afghanistan.
Bill Clinton is another comedian, having got himself appointed the UN’s man in
Haiti. Once fawned upon by the BBC as “Mr. Nice Guy... bringing democracy back
to a sad and troubled land”, Clinton is Haiti’s most notorious privateer,
demanding de-regulation of the economy for the benefit of the sweatshop barons.
Lately, he has been promoting a $55m deal to turn the north of Haiti into an
American-annexed “tourist playground”.
Not for tourists is the US building its fifth biggest embassy in Port-au-Prince.
Oil was found in Haiti’s waters decades ago and the US has kept it in reserve
until the Middle East begins to run dry. More urgently, an occupied Haiti has a
strategic importance in Washington’s “rollback” plans for Latin America. The
goal is the overthrow of the popular democracies in Venezuela, Bolivia and
Ecuador, control of Venezuela’s abundant oil reserves and sabotage of the
growing regional cooperation that has given millions their first taste of an
economic and social justice long denied by US-sponsored regimes.
The first rollback success came last year with the coup against President Jose
Manuel Zelaya in Honduras who also dared advocate a minimum wage and that the
rich pay tax. Obama’s secret support for the illegal regime carries a clear
warning to vulnerable governments in central America. Last October, the regime
in Colombia, long bankrolled by Washington and supported by death squads, handed
the US seven military bases to, according to US air force documents, “combat
anti-US governments in the region”.
Media propaganda has laid the ground for what may well be Obama’s next war. On
14 December, researchers at the University of West England published first
findings of a ten-year study of the BBC’s reporting of Venezuela. Of 304 BBC
reports, only three mentioned any of the historic reforms of the Chavez
government, while the majority denigrated Chavez’s extraordinary democratic
record, at one point comparing him to Hitler.
Such distortion and its attendant servitude to western power are rife across the
Anglo-American corporate media. People who struggle for a better life, or for
life itself, from Venezuela to Honduras to Haiti, deserve our suppor
http://test.orf.at/go/news/s47171.html
Adoptionsmissbrauch bei Kindern in Haiti
Kritik an übereilten Adoptionen 21.01. 00:00
Hilfsorganisationen in Haiti haben am Donnerstag vor vorschnellen Adoptionen
gewarnt. In vielen Fällen würden die Kinder so rasch ins Ausland gebracht, dass
keine Zeit bleibe, nach überlebenden Verwandten zu suchen, kritisierte unter
anderen der Verein Word Vision. Derzeit verlassen jeden Tag Flugzeuge mit
Dutzenden Kindern an Bord den Karibik-Staat - Ziel ist meist Europa oder die
USA.
Neue Eltern in den Niederlanden
Am Donnerstag landete eine Maschine mit 106 Kindern aus der haitianischen
Hauptstadt Port-au-Prince im niederländischen Eindhoven. Reporter berichteten,
die Kinder seien zwischen sechs Monate und sieben Jahre alt gewesen.
Die Adoptionsagentur, die den Flug organisiert hatte, versicherte gegenüber
Journalisten, dass bis auf neun Kinder alle bereits neue Eltern in den
Niederlanden und Luxemburg hätten.
Kinder auch nach Deutschland und in USA
Auch in den USA kamen bereits am Dienstag die ersten 50 Adoptivkinder an.
Deutschland vereinfachte am Donnerstag die Einreisebestimmungen für Kinder aus
Haiti. In den nächsten Tagen sollen 30 Kinder, die bereits an deutsche Eltern
vermittelt wurden, in ihrer neuen Heimat ankommen.
"Familien wieder zusammenführen"
Doch die Kritik an der raschen Verschickung der Kinder wächst. "Übereilte neue
Adoptionen würden viele Familien auf Dauer auseinanderreißen", lautete ein
Aufruf der Organisationen World Vision und Save the Children. "Die Erfahrung hat
gezeigt, dass die meisten Kinder überlebende Verwandte haben. Die Anstrengungen
müssen dahingehen, diese zu finden und die Familien wieder zusammenzuführen."
Nur mit Begleitung über Landesgrenze
Hier seien klare Adoptionsrichtlinien der haitianischen Regierung notwendig,
forderten die Hilfsorganisationen. Besorgt sei man auch, dass die Kinder
vermehrt ohne Begleitung in die benachbarte Dominikanische Republik geschickt
würden. Kinder sollten Haiti derzeit nur in Begleitung von Verwandten verlassen
dürfen, auch zur medizinischen Versorgung.
22.000 auf Suchlisten registriert
In dem vom Beben unversehrt gebliebenen SOS-Kinderdorf Santo sollen laut SOS-Koordinator
Georg Willeit in Kürze die ersten vereinsamten Kinder aufgenommen werden, um
dort vorübergehend Schutz und Geborgenheit zu finden.
"Ich sage bewusst nicht Waisen", betonte Willeit. "Das Chaos ist so groß, dass
nicht mit absoluter Sicherheit geklärt werden kann, ob die Kinder noch Eltern
oder Verwandte haben." Willeit sprach sich entschieden dagegen aus, allein
gelassene Kinder auszufliegen und damit noch stärker zu entwurzeln. Vielmehr
bemühe sich seine Organisation darum, Eltern und Verwandte wiederzufinden.
Derzeit habe das Internationale Rote Kreuz in Haiti mehr als 22.000 Personen auf
Suchlisten registriert.
Viele Kinder haben Familien
Auch das UNO-Kinderhilfswerk (UNICEF) warnte vor überstürzten Adoptionen. Viele
der rund 50.000 Kinder, die vor dem Beben in Haiti in Krippen und Heimen
untergebracht gewesen seien, seien von ihren Familien dorthin gebracht worden,
um ihnen eine bessere Versorgung zu ermöglichen.
"Wir erleben auch, dass Menschen bei uns in Köln anrufen und sagen: 'Ich könnte
ein Kind bei mir aufnehmen'", berichtete der deutsche UNICEF-Sprecher Rudi
Tarneden gegenüber der Nachrichtenagentur dpa. Das wäre laut Tarneder aber nicht
im Interesse der Kinder.
"Stellen Sie sich umgekehrt einmal vor, in Hamburg oder Köln wäre ein schweres
Erdbeben, und es würden Helfer aus China einfliegen und die Kinder von der
Straße aufsammeln, um sie zu neuen Eltern zu bringen."
Schutzzentren für Minderjährige
UNICEF richtet in Haiti deshalb Schutzzentren für rund 900 Minderjährige ein.
"Tausende Kinder im Erdbebengebiet schlagen sich allein durch. Sie sind von
Mangelernährung, Krankheiten und Ausbeutung bedroht", erklärte Tarneden. Geplant
seien auch sichere Zonen für unter Fünfjährige im Katastrophengebiet.
Keine Adoptionen nach Österreich
In Österreich gibt es laut Außenministerium bisher keine Anträge oder
Interessenten für neue, rascher abgewickelte Adoptionen. Viele Anfragen
verzeichne man allerdings wegen kurzfristiger Aufenthalte und Besuche von Opfern
in Österreich. Viele wollten den traumatisierten Kindern helfen, so ein
Sprecher. Diesbezüglich verweise man aber auf zuständige NGOs.