Germaine Tillion
[2005] The Problem of the Gas Chambers By Robert
Faurisson 2005 as far as the "gas chamber" of Ravensbrück is
concerned, we have many points of "evidence" and "undeniable eyewitness
accounts," beginning with repeated and extensive eyewitness accounts by
Marie-Claude Vaillant-Couturier or Germaine Tillion.
It gets even better. Several years after the war, before both
British and French tribunals, the camp officials of Ravensbrück (Suhren,
Schwarzhuber and Treite) repeatedly confessed to the existence of a "gas
chamber" in their camp. They even vaguely described its operation. Eventually,
those who did not commit suicide were executed because of this alleged "gas
chamber." The same "confessions" were given prior to their deaths by Ziereis for
Mauthausen (Austria) and by Kramer for Struthof-Natzweiler (Alsace).
Confessions of SS Men who were at Auschwitz by Robert Faurisson
My second remark is to recall that, in the cases from Ravensbrück where people now know that there never was any "gassing," the British and French courts obtained confessions which were particularly detailed on the alleged 11 gassings." People speak to us about the three principal confessions of Auschwitz, but they no longer speak to us at all about the three principal confessions of Ravensbrück: that of the camp commandant, Suhren, that of his adjutant Schwarzhuber and that of the camp physician, Dr. Treite. Do you know what was the size of that "gas chamber" that never existed? Answer: nine meters by four and one half meters. Do you know where it was located? Answer: five meters away from the two crematory ovens. Do you know how many persons were gassed there? Of what nationality? On what precise dates? Do you wish to know on whose orders all of that was done, from the top to the bottom of the German military and political hierarchy? Are you interested in learning how they used a "gas capsule" (sic)? You will find the answers to these questions and to many others while reading, for example, the historian Germaine Tillion. That French woman had been interned at Ravensbrück. After returning to France, she became an official specialist in the history of the deportation. She worked at that same famous CNRS (National Center for Scientific Research) in Paris where Léon Poliakov also worked. Germaine Tillion enjoys in France, for reasons of which I am unaware, considerable moral credit. Her honesty is a sort of established fact. Nevertheless, several years after the war, she went before the courts to overwhelm the persons responsible for Ravensbrück with her stories about the "gas chambers." Even more than her book about the camp (Ravensbrück, Paris, Le Seuil, 1973 reprinting, 284 pages), one must read her "Reflections on the Study of the Deportation" ("Reflexions sur 1'étude de la d6portation," in the Revue d'Histoire de la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale, July to September 1954, pp. 3-38).According to the English investigators, from the first moment he had coolly faced his position, he judged himself lost and either to have peace (and the small privileges to which the prisoners who do not deceive the examining magistrates have a right, or else due to lassitude, indifference or to quite another reason) he took his course and held to it, without regard for himself or for his accomplices. He was not a brute (like Binder or Pflaum.); he had an intelligent expression, the appearance and behavior of a psychologically normal man.