Survivors Witnessed Explosions Inside Twin Towers
by Christopher Bollyn
October 17, 2001
The mainstream media is ignoring eyewitness accounts of bombs that exploded
inside the World Trade Center before the collapse of the Twin Towers. Despite
reports from numerous eyewitnesses and experts, including news reporters on the
scene, who heard or saw explosions immediately before the collapse of the World
Trade Center, there has been virtual silence in the mainstream media.
Television viewers watching the horrific events of Sept. 11 saw evidence of
explosions before the towers collapsed. Televised images show what appears to be
a huge explosion occurring near ground level, in the vicinity of the 47-story
Salomon Brothers Building, known as WTC 7, prior to the collapse of the first
tower.
Van Romero, an explosives expert and former director of the Energetic Materials
Research and Testing Center at New Mexico Tech, said on Sept. 11, "My opinion
is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center
there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to
collapse." The collapse of the structures resembled the controlled implosions
used to demolish old structures and was "too methodical to be a chance result of
airplanes colliding with the structures," Romero told the Albuquerque Journal
hours after the attack.
Implosions are violent collapses inwards, which are used to demolish buildings
in areas of high density, to prevent damage to surrounding buildings.
Precision-timed explosives are placed on strategic load-bearing columns and
beams to cause the controlled collapse. Demolition experts say that towers are
the most difficult buildings to bring down in a controlled manner. A tower tends
to fall like a tree, unless the direction of its fall is controlled by
directional charges. The WTC towers "smokestacked" neatly, falling within the
boundaries of their foundations. Skeptics say this could not have happened
coincidentally and it must have been caused by strategically placed and
precisely timed internal charges. Videotape images may reveal these internal
charges precipitating the controlled demolition of the towers and WTC 7.
Romero is vice president of research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and
Technology, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on
buildings, aircraft and other structures, and often assists in forensic
investigations into terrorist attacks, often by setting off similar explosions
and studying the effects.
After being hit by the aircraft, the twin towers appeared to be stable. Then
without warning, at 9:58 a.m. the south tower imploded vertically downwards, 53
minutes after being hit. At 10:28, 88 minutes after being struck, the north
tower collapsed. "It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger
an event like that," Romero said. If explosions did cause the towers to
collapse, "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in
strategic points," he said.
"One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack and
secondary device," Romero said. Attackers detonate an initial, diversionary
explosion, in this case the collision of the planes into the towers, which
brings emergency personnel to the scene, then detonate a second explosion.
Ten days after the attack, following criticism of his initial remarks, Romero
did an about-face in his analysis of the collapse, "Certainly the fire is what
caused the building to fail," he told the Albuquerque Journal on Sept. 21.
The twin towers were struck by Boeing 767's carrying approximately 23,000
gallons of fuel.
However, there is other information that lends credence to Romero's
controversial original explanation of explosives being involved. I spoke with
an eyewitness whose office is near the World Trade Center. He had been standing
among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two-and-a-half blocks from the
South Tower, when he saw "a number of brief light sources being emitted from
inside the building between floors 10 and 15." He saw about six of these brief
flashes, accompanied by "a crackling sound" before the tower collapsed. Each
tower had 47 central support columns.
One of the first firefighters in the stricken second tower, Louie Cacchioli, 51,
told People magazine of Sept. 24: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator
to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a
bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building." Kim White, 32,
an employee on the 80th floor, also reported hearing an explosion. "All of a
sudden the building shook, then it started to sway. We didn't know what was
going on," she told People. "We got all our people on the floor into the
stairwell . . . at that time we all thought it was a fire . . .We got down as
far as the 74th floor . . . then there was another explosion."
The accepted theory is that as the fires raged in the towers, the steel cores in
each building were heated to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit, causing the support beams
to buckle. A lead engineer who designed the World Trade Center Towers expressed
shock that the towers collapsed after being hit by passenger jets. "I designed
it for a 707 to hit it," Lee Robertson, the project's structural engineer said.
The Boeing 707 has a fuel capacity of more than 23,000 gallons, comparable to
the 767's 23,980-gallon fuel capacity.
Another architect of the WTC, Aaron Swirski, lives in Israel and spoke to
Jerusalem Post Radio after the attack: "It was designed around that eventuality
to survive this kind of attack," he said.
I spoke with Hyman Brown, a University of Colorado civil engineering professor
and the World Trade Center's construction manager. Brown had watched in
confusion as the towers came down. "It was over-designed to withstand almost
anything including hurricanes, high winds, bombings and an airplane hitting it,"
he said.
Brown said that although the buildings were designed to withstand "a 150-year
storm" and the impact of a Boeing 707, he said the jet fuel burning at 2,000
degrees Fahrenheit weakened the steel. Brown explained that the south tower
collapsed first as it was struck lower with more weight above the impact area.
Brown said he "did not buy" the theory that the implosion was caused by the
fires sucking the air out of the lower floors, which has been speculated.
The contractor who is reported to have been the first on the WTC collapse scene
to cart away the rubble that remains is a company that specializes in the
scientific demolition of large buildings, Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of
Baltimore, headed by Mark Loizeaux. CDI is the same contractor that demolished
and hauled away the shell of the bombed Oklahoma City Murrah building, actions
that prevented independent investigators from pursuing evidence on leads
suggesting that there were bombs set off inside the building.
In February 2000, a federal grand jury indicted Mark Loizeaux, Douglas Loizeaux
and Controlled Demolition, Inc. on charges of falsely reporting campaign
contributions made by family members and CDI employees who had been asked to
donate to the campaign of Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.). The Baltimore Sun
reported that the illegal contributions allegedly occurred between 1996 and
1998. The Loizeaux brothers and CDI were acquitted in September 2000. Cleaning
up the estimated 1.2 million tons of rubble will reportedly cost $7 billion and
take up to a year.
Removing the debris has also been controversial. The police said that some scrap
metal has been diverted to mob-controlled businesses rather than the dump where
investigators are examining rubble for clues and human remains.
The second plane nearly missed the South Tower, cutting through a corner. Most
of its fuel burned in an outside explosion. However, this building collapsed
first, long before the North Tower, into which a similar plane entered
completely.