Is Ariel Sharon the Mastermind of 9-11?
13 January 2006
The controlled media whitewashes Ariel Sharon's long history as a master of
terrorism in the same way that it censors all discussion of the evidence of
Israeli military intelligence being involved in the terror attacks of 9-11. Yet,
the question remains: Is Sharon the terrorist mastermind behind 9-11?
As the Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon was hospitalized following a massive
stroke on January 4, reporters from the controlled media held a vigil outside
Jerusalem's Hadassah Hospital where Israel's 77-year old leader lay in a
drug-induced coma. The media spotlight on the comatose veteran military
commander avoided mentioning Sharon's long career as a master terrorist and the
many massacres and war crimes he has been involved in.
The New York Times and CNN, who describe Sharon as "a hawk-turned-statesman,"
allowed Benjamin Netanyahu, an Israeli politician from the same extreme
right-wing Zionist movement as Sharon, to define the prime minister as a heroic
figure without raising a single question about the thousands of innocent
Palestinian lives snuffed out since he came to power in 2001. The U.S. media
focus on the ailing Zionist leader ignores the documented evidence of Sharon's
58-year history as a master of terrorism who has ruthlessly used terror as a
weapon and a tool to achieve his strategic and political goals. Sharon's primary
strategic goal has always been to build a fortified Jewish ghetto-state in
Palestine. As a 19-year-old son of Russian Zionist immigrants, Sharon fought in
the Latrun offensive during the 1948 war in which Israeli forces seized a
strategic wedge-shaped piece of Palestinian land leading to Jerusalem.
"The myth of 'Sharon's Legacy' was already beginning to form" as he lay in the
hospital, Israeli peace activist and author Uri Avnery wrote in his article,
"The Israeli Napoleon." The left, Avnery says, "who only yesterday had cursed
Sharon as the murderer of Kibieh [Kibya], the butcher of Sabra and Shatila, and
the man responsible for the plunder and slaughter in the occupied Palestinian
territories, began to admire him as the 'Man of Peace.'
"Settlers, who had condemned him as a traitor, remembered that it was he who had
created the settlements and kept on enlarging them to this day. Only yesterday
he was one of the most hated people in Israel and the world," Avnery wrote.
"Today, after the evacuation of Gush Katif [in Gaza], he has become the darling
of the public, almost from wall to wall. The leaders of nations crowned him as
the 'great warrior who has turned into a hero of peace.'
"All these analyses have only one thing in common," Avnery said, "they have
nothing to do with the real Ariel Sharon. They are based on ignorance, illusion
and self-deception.
"He has not changed at all," Avnery, who has "personal knowledge" of Sharon,
said. "He stayed true to his fundamental approach, only adapting his slogans to
changing times and circumstances. His master-plan remained as it was at the
beginning. Underlying his world view is a simplistic, 19th century style
nationalism, which says: our people stands above all others, other people are
inferior. The rights of our nation are sacred; other nations have no rights at
all. The rules of morality apply only to relations within the nation, not to
relations between nations," Avnery wrote.
"On this moral base the aim emerged: to establish a Jewish state, as large as
possible, free of non-Jews. That could lead to the conclusion that the ethnic
cleansing, begun by Ben-Gurion in 1948, when half the Palestinians were deprived
of their homes and land, must be completed," Avnery wrote. "Sharon's career
began shortly after, when he was appointed to lead the undercover commando Unit
101, whose murderous actions beyond the borders were designed mainly to prevent
the refugees from infiltrating back to their villages."
SHARON THE TERRORIST
A salient fact of Israeli history, generally ignored by the Zionist-controlled
press, is that several Israeli prime ministers were terrorists who bombed and
murdered their way to the top. Menachem Begin, Itzchak Shamir, and Ariel Sharon
were all well-known terrorists who later became Israeli prime ministers.
Sharon, for example, commanded a terrorist massacre in Kibya, a West Bank
village, which was then Jordanian in 1953. This particular raid had a profound
impact on US-Israeli relations. In the middle of the night of October 14, 1953,
Sharon led his Unit 101 across the border and into the defenseless sleeping
village. Using automatic weapons and grenades, Sharon and his men forced fleeing
residents back into their homes and used dynamite to blow up 41 homes and a
school -- with the people inside. Sixty-nine civilians were slaughtered. The
massacre and demolition lasted seven hours. Days later the U.S. State
Department issued a statement calling the Kibya massacre "shocking" and
confirming that aid to Israel had been suspended. This was the first and only
time that an American president cut off all aid to Israel.
While a sympathetic Israeli journalist on CNN described Sharon as "a biblical
hero," it should be remembered that the so-called "hawk-turned-statesman" is
personally responsible for much of the terrorism, violence, and instability that
has plagued Palestine, Israel, and the Middle East during the past six decades.
Sharon, for example, as Israel's defense minister, commanded the illegal
invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and was later removed from that position when an
Israeli commission of inquiry found that he had "personal responsibility" for
the massacres that occurred in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and
Shatila in September 1982. The death toll from the three-day massacre, which
occurred in camps under Israeli control and with the support and assistance of
Israeli forces, is estimated to be more than 3,000 lives, mostly women and
children. Sharon was "the biggest liar this side of the Mediterranean" and a
man whose "word was worth nothing," Philip Habib, the U.S. Special Envoy to
Lebanon, said at the time.
Eighteen years later, Sharon single-handedly provoked the Palestinian uprising
known as the Al Aqsa Intifada by invading, with scores of heavily-armed Israeli
troops, the most sacred Muslim site in Jerusalem on Sept. 28, 2000. The
subsequent Israeli military response resulted in 25 Palestinian civilians being
killed for every Israeli death. Supposedly to quell the violence, which he had
personally brought about, Sharon then authorized the building of a hideous
fortified barrier wall, not unlike that which separated East and West Germany,
illegally appropriating a great deal of Palestinian land in the process.
In the weeks and months after 9-11, Sharon was a frequent visitor to the White
House, where he held secret discussions with President George W. Bush. As the
U.S. invaded and occupied Afghanistan, the Israeli military carried out a brutal
invasion and re-occupation of the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and
the Gaza Strip. In April 2002, the Israeli army besieged and attacked the
Palestinian refugee camp of Jenin using bulldozers to destroy houses with the
inhabitants still inside. Sharon's frequent use of bulldozers to destroy
Palestinian homes and orchards has earned him the moniker "the Bulldozer."
Sharon then refused United Nations investigators access to the devastated camp,
in which crimes against humanity had clearly been committed.
SHARON AND 9-11
As reported since September 2001, there is a great deal of evidence that
Israel's military intelligence was involved in the terror attacks of 9-11, which
raises the obvious question about Sharon's personal role in the events that
launched the War on Terror. Logically, the evidence offers two options: either
Sharon as prime minister had prior knowledge of 9-11 and is one of the chief
architects of the terror attacks or the Mossad, Israel's military intelligence
agency, is under the command of an outside authority, and was involved in a
massive covert operation in the United States without the knowledge of the prime
minister.
For the following reasons, the second option seems highly unlikely:
Were the hordes of Israeli intelligence agents, including some 200 fake movers
and art students nabbed by police in the United States in connection with the
terror attacks of 9-11, simply part of a rogue operation, which Sharon, the
master of Israeli state-sponsored terrorism, was completely unaware of? Did the
Mossad establish phony moving companies in the New York City area and have
dozens of agents with prior knowledge, like those arrested in New Jersey on
9-11, running around the country in moving vans without the prime minister
knowing? Were the Odigo instant text message warnings, which clearly showed
prior knowledge of the attacks and which were received by Israeli employees of
the Mossad-operated company hours before the first plane hit, being sent between
agents of a rogue terror network of which Sharon had no control or knowledge?
Because the evidence clearly points to Israeli state involvement the controlled
press in the United States has censored any discussion of Mossad's involvement
in the terror attacks of 9-11. Therefore, the obvious question concerning Sharon
is never asked: Is he the terrorist mastermind behind 9-11?
While the controlled media seeks to whitewash Sharon's career as a master of
terrorism, the evidence indicates that he was involved in 9-11 and that the
Zionist-controlled media is complicit in a conspiracy to cover-up the evidence.
This is to say that Sharon is one of the chief architects of the 9-11 terror
attacks. Zionist agents in key positions in the U.S. government, like Michael
Chertoff at the Dept. of Justice, the son of one of Israel's first Mossad
agents, facilitated the 9-11 cover-up by releasing scores of arrested Israeli
intelligence agents and assigning blame to Muslims in order to start the War on
Terror.
Ignoring Sharon's criminal record put American interests and lives in peril,
this writer wrote in February 2001. After the U.S. House of Representatives
passed a resolution on Feb. 13, 2001, congratulating the newly-elected Israeli
prime minister, I warned that to ignore Sharon's long history of state-sponsored
terrorism and war crimes endangered the American people on whose behalf Congress
had extended "the best wishes."
"To ignore Sharon's Machiavellian character and criminal record may very well
put American interests and lives in peril," I wrote then. "Sharon has a history
of duplicity and has betrayed the United States in the past."
"In a minimally just world Sharon would be behind bars," the American author
Edward S. Herman wrote in June 2002. "Sharon is treated in the West as a
respected statesman, even called a 'man of peace' by George W. Bush in the wake
of Sharon's new war crimes at Jenin, Nablus, Bethlehem, and other West Bank
towns. This treatment of Sharon has one great merit," Herman wrote, "it makes
crystal clear that the 'war on terror' is a 'war of terror.'"