Fire Engineers Refute 9-11 Collapse Theory
by Christopher Bollyn
Published in AFP of May 27, 2002; written in January 2002.
A respected professional magazine read by fire fighters and engineers is calling
the investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Towers a farce and a
sham. Fire Engineering magazine, the 125-year old journal of record among
America's fire engineers and firefighters, blasted the investigation being
conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the collapsed
World Trade Center as a "a half-baked farce.
Fire Engineering frequently publishes technical studies of major fires and is
read in fire departments and schools of fire engineering across the nation.
Fire Engineering's editor, William Manning, issued a "call to action" to
America's firefighters and fire engineers in the January 2002 issue asking them
to contact their representatives in Congress and officials in Washington to
demand a blue ribbon panel to thoroughly investigate the collapse of the World
Trade Center structures. Manning challenged the theory that the towers
collapsed as a result of the crashed airliners and the subsequent fuel fires,
saying, "Respected members of the fire protection engineering community are
beginning to raise red flags, and a resonating theory has emerged: The
structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel in
themselves were not enough to bring down the towers."
No evidence has been produced to support the theory that the burning jet fuel
and secondary fires "attacking the questionably fireproofed lightweight trusses
and load-bearing columns directly caused the collapses," Manning wrote, adding
that the collapses occurred "in an alarmingly short time." Manning visited the
site shortly after the collapse and his photographs appeared in the October 2001
issue of Fire Engineering. None of the photos show the load-bearing central
steel support columns standing or fallen, which raises the question, what caused
these columns to disintegrate?
The steel from the site must be preserved to allow investigators to determine
what caused the collapse, Manning said. "The destruction and removal of evidence
must stop immediately. For more than three months, structural steel from the
World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap.
Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building
design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to
China," Manning said, "perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy
your next car."
"Such destruction of evidence," Manning wrote, "shows the astounding ignorance
of government officials to the value of a thorough, scientific investigation of
the largest fire-induced collapse in world history." Nowhere in the national
standard for fire investigation does one find an exemption allowing the
destruction of evidence for buildings over 10 stories tall, Manning said.
"Clearly, there are burning questions that need answers. Based on the incident's
magnitude alone, a full-throttle, fully-resourced, forensic investigation is
imperative. The lessons about the buildings' design and behavior in this
extraordinary event must be learned and applied in the real world.
"Did they throw away the locked doors from the Triangle Shirtwaist fire? Did
they throw away the gas can used at the Happyland Social Club fire? Did they
cast aside the pressure-regulating valves at the Meridian Plaza fire? Of course
not. But essentially, that's what they're doing at the World trade Center."
In a separate editorial, "WTC Investigation? A Call to Action," by the
magazine's technical editor, Prof. Glenn Corbett of John Jay University in New
York City, and two other expert fire engineers who specialize in high-rise
buildings, The FEMA-led investigation was called "uncoordinated" and
"superficial."
"The World Trade Center disaster demands the most comprehensive, detailed
investigation possible," the writers said. "No event in our entire fire service
history has ever come close to the magnitude of this incident." Given the
magnitude of the disaster "you would think we would have the largest fire
investigation in the world history," the editorial says. "You would be wrong.
Instead, we have a series of unconnected and uncoordinated superficial
inquiries. No comprehensive 'Presidential Blue Ribbon Commission.' No top-notch
National Transportation Safety Board-like response. Ironically, we will probably
gain more detailed information about the destruction of the planes than we will
about the destruction of the towers. We are literally treating the steel removed
from the site like garbage, not like crucial fire scene evidence."
A group of engineers from the American Society of Civil Engineers, commissioned
by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is reported to be studying "some
aspects of the collapse," but not all, according to Manning and others. The
engineers' investigation, they say, has not looked into all aspects of the
disaster and has had limited access to documents and other evidence. "Except
for the marginal benefit obtained from a three-day, visual walk-through of
evidence sites conducted by ASCE investigation committee members - described by
one close source as a "tourist trip" - no one's checking the evidence for
anything," Manning said. "As things now stand and if they continue in such
fashion, the investigation into the World Trade Center fire and collapse will
amount to paper and computer generated hypotheticals."
Engineers have also complained that they have been shackled with bureaucratic
restrictions that prevented them form examining the disaster site, interviewing
witnesses and requesting crucial information like recorded distress calls to
police and fire departments. "This is almost the dream team of engineers in the
country working on this, and our hands are tied," one engineer who asked not to
be identified told the New York Times. Members of the team of engineers have
been threatened with dismissal for speaking to the press. "FEMA is controlling
everything," the anonymous engineer complained.
"Comprehensive disaster investigations mean increased safety," Manning said.
"They mean positive change. NASA knows it. The NTSB knows it. Does FEMA know
it? No. Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the 'official
investigation' blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil
Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by
political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of
full disclosure," he wrote.