THE POISONED NEEDLE
Suppressed Facts About Vaccination

By Eleanor McBean
1957 

[Whale, June 2002, Polio sections extracted--Chapter 10 & most addendums]   For complete book or polio section

CHAPTER I THE POISONED NEEDLE
WHERE HAVE THE "GREAT STRIDES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE" TAKEN US?
THE INSIDE STORY
VACCINATION IS BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE
VACCINATION LOWERS RESISTANCE AND INVITES DISEASE
SUMMARIZING THE CASE AGAINST VACCINATION
CHAPTER 2: SMALLPOX DECLINED BEFORE VACCINATION WAS ENFORCED
CHART SHOWING DECREASE IN SMALLPOX DEATHS AFTER DECLINE OF VACCINATION
STATEMENTS OF HEALTH OFFICIALS REGARDING VACCINATED SMALLPOX
UNVACCINATED DISEASES DECLINED FASTER THAN VACCINATED SMALLPOX
REPORT FROM BRITISH INDIA
WORLD’S WORST RECORD IN MEXICO
EVIDENCE FROM ITALY
CHART SHOWING INCREASE OF SMALLPOX UNDER COMPULSORY VACCINATION
HIGH SMALLPOX RATE IN VACCINATED EGYPT
IMMUNIZATION INCREASED DIPHTHERIA IN SOME COUNTRIES
IMMUNIZATION INCREASED DIPHTHERIA IN SOME COUNTRIES
DECLINE OF VACCINATION IN UNITED STATES
CHAPTER 3: VACCINATION HIT BY DOCTORS
GOVERNOR HAS SUSPICIONS
CHAPTER 4: THE HISTORY OF VACCINATION
WHO STARTED VACCINATION AND WHY’
VACCINATION IS NOT SCIENTIFIC
INCREASED DEATH-RATE AFTER VACCINATION WAS ESTABLISHED
TUBERCULOSIS CAUSED BY VACCINATION
VACCINATION IS OF VERY ANCIENT ORIGIN
INOCULATION IN AMERICA
VACCINATION BASED ON DAIRYMAID’S STORY — NOT SCIENTIFIC
VACCINATION DOES NOT IMMUNIZE, SAY AUTHORITIES
WHAT HAPPENED TO JENNER’S LIFETIME IMMUNITY?
JENNER’S ATTITUDE TOWARD COMPLAINTS AND DISASTER OF VACCINATION
ENGLISH GOVERNMENT SUPPORTED JENNER IN HIS VENTURE
EVEN JENNER RECOGNIZED THE FAILURE OF VACCINATION
RE-VACCINATION DESTROYS PROMISED IMMUNITY
JENNER FANS RESENT THE TRUTH
RECORDS SHOW RE-VACCINATION FAILS
CHAPTER 5: CANCER CAUSED BY VACCINATION
PHOTOGRAPHS OF FATAL CANCER CASES CAUSED BY VACCINATION
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY REVEALS STARTLING FACTS
DOCTOR FORESEES A NATION OF INVALIDS
FAULTY CANCER RESEARCH IMPEDES PROGRESS
THE MEDICALLY MADE IRON CURTAIN
90 PER CENT DIE OF MEDICALLY TREATED CANCER
CANCER — NO MYSTERY
LYMPHATIC INVOLVEMENT IN CANCER
DOES DIET HAVE ANY EFFECT ON CANCER?
HOW SHALL WE LEARN ABOUT FASTING?
WHAT KILLED BERNARR MACFADDEN?
WHAT’S WRONG WITH EARLY DIAGNOSIS?
CHAPTER 6:  SYPHILIS AND VACCINATION
ENCYCLOPEDIA ON VACCINAL SYPHILIS
MORE EVIDENCE
COMPARISON OF SMALLPOX, COWPOX AND SYPHILIS
WHY VACCINATION CANNOT IMMUNIZE AGAINST SMALLPOX
CHAPTER 7: OTHER DISEASES CAUSED BY VACCINATION
GOVERNMENT REPORTS REVEAL MORE DEATHS FROM VACCINATION THAN FROM SMALLPOX
30,438 SOLDIERS WERE STRICKEN BY VACCINATION DISEASE
DEFECTIVE TEETH AND EYESIGHT TRACED TO VACCINATION
FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE CAUSED BY VACCINATION
WHAT OTHER AUTHORITIES SAY ABOUT VACCINATION AND DISEASE
VACCINATION INCREASES COMMON DISEASES SUCH AS MEASLES INFLUENZA, CHICKEN-POX, MUMPS, SCARLET etc
CITY SURVEY BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINATION SHOWS INCREASE IN DISEASE
CHART SHOWING INCREASE IN DISEASE BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINATION CAMPAIGN
FALSIFIED SMALLPOX REPORTS
POST-WAR GERMANY REVEALS TRUTH ABOUT VACCINATION
WHAT DOES VACCINATION DO TO THE BODY?
VACCINE CANNOT BE MADE SAFE
CASE HISTORIES
CHAPTER 8: DEATHS FROM VACCINATION
FIVE HUNDRED KILLED BY VACCINATION IN FIVE MONTHS IN U. S.
SOLDIERS DISABLED AND KILLED BY VACCINATION
PHOTOGRAPHS OF VICTIMS OF VACCINATION
VACCINATION DEATHS NOT REPORTED
VACCINATION DEATHS IN COLORADOCHAPTER 7: OTHER DISEASES CAUSED BY VACCINATION
GOVERNMENT REPORTS REVEAL MORE DEATHS FROM VACCINATION THAN FROM SMALLPOX
30,438 SOLDIERS WERE STRICKEN BY VACCINATION DISEASE
DEFECTIVE TEETH AND EYESIGHT TRACED TO VACCINATION
FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE CAUSED BY VACCINATION
WHAT OTHER AUTHORITIES SAY ABOUT VACCINATION AND DISEASE
VACCINATION INCREASES COMMON DISEASES SUCH AS MEASLES INFLUENZA, CHICKEN-POX, MUMPS, SCARLET FEVER, ETC
CITY SURVEY BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINATION SHOWS INCREASE IN DISEASE
CHART SHOWING INCREASE IN DISEASE BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINATION CAMPAIGN
FALSIFIED SMALLPOX REPORTS
POST-WAR GERMANY REVEALS TRUTH ABOUT VACCINATION
WHAT DOES VACCINATION DO TO THE BODY?
VACCINE CANNOT BE MADE SAFE
CHAPTER 9: MEDICAL INTERFERENCE
A PLANNED MEDICAL CONSPIRACY
CONTRACTS TO DEFRAUD THE PUBLIC
REGARDING THE MEDICAL MONOPOLY
HOW THE HIGH PRESSURE MEDICAL LOBBYING INFLUENCES LEGISLATION
WHO HAS THE MONOPOLY ON WORDS?
MORE FREEDOM DENIED
SUPREME COURT ESTABLISHED A PRECEDENT
HEALTH BOOKS ATTACKED BY MEDICAL TRUST
GANGSTERS IN THE GOVERNMENT
HEALTH RESEARCH ATTACKED BY MEDICAL-TRUST
WHERE CRIME PAYS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

February 4, 1956—THE ROMANCE OF FLUORIDES (No. 1)
February 11, 1956.ROMANCE OF FLUORIDES (No. 2)
February 18, 1956. ROMANCE OF FLUORIDES (No. 3)

Rabies Past Present in Scientific Review---Millicent Morden

Address by Miss Lily Loat January, 1927.

The purpose of this volume is to provide a working reference of various statements regarding vaccination and not to offer a "cure" of any specific disease in any specific individual.

Preconceived opinions regarding vaccination will not be changed overnight nor by the reading of a single book. Herein are the opinions of many great scientists and doctors (of many schools). Many have spent a life-time of research—of trial and error before making their statements. The reader has the privilege to accept or to reject the statements after due deliberation.

Thus we feel this volume should not be considered a dangerous book for the layman but a thought-provoking treatise.

PREFACE

For the past 2000 years physicians have been looking in the wrong direction for the cure of disease. Their worse than useless practice of killing germs with poison drugs has never — and can never — solve the problem of disease.

During the Dark Ages, before the introduction of improved nutrition and sanitation, the world was intermittently visited with epidemics of smallpox. The cause was stubbornly ignored and the seeds for more disease were sown when vaccination was brought into popular use. This infusion of poison injected into the blood stream of the masses only served to intensify the disease in some cases, suppress the symptoms in others and create new and more serious diseases in still others. So, with the passing of years we have seen this misbegotten child of

ignorance grow into a Frankenstein monster of immense proportions that moves relentlessly forward, grinding under foot the multitudes that throng its path.

Through the lethal power of this poisoned needle, the simple zymotic (contagious) diseases of the past have been devolved into the horrors of the present — our terrifying and expanding crop of "killer diseases". Many of these strange "mystery diseases" that baffle the entire medical world, are the sordid products of vaccine poisons that disturb the chemical balance of the body and interfere with normal functioning.

All these medically-made atrocities are far worse than smallpox or any of the other eruptive diseases that nature provides as a means of expelling the accumulated poison waste from the abused body. This interference with the balanced economy of nature has multiplied the problems beyond the power of science to control.

Our worst epidemics now are epidemics of vaccination in which more people are killed every year by "vaccinal diseases" than by the diseases that the vaccinations were supposed to combat.

Complete freedom from disease can scarcely be found except in remote islands or isolated communities that have not been invaded by medical mischief and commercialized products. Is our proud civilization to be degraded, corrupted, and destroyed by its own inventions designed for selfish profit and exploitation of the race?

Vaccination, instead of being the promised blessing to the world, has proved to be a curse of such sweeping devastation that it has caused more death and disease than war, pestilence, and plague combined. There is no scourge (with the possible exception of atomic radiation) that is more destructive to our nation’s health than this monument of human deception — this slayer of the innocent —this crippler of body and brain — THE POISONED NEEDLE.

Eleanor McBean

CHAPTER I
THE POISONED NEEDLE

"Truth wears no mask, seeks neither place nor applause, bows to no human shrine; she only asks a hearing."

The increasing flood of evidence against vaccination and the growing for the un-suppressed facts about this "touchy" subject have literally forced this book into being.

As this work has progressed and the extensive research has been carried to trace down and organize the material for this manuscript, other valuable long concealed records, that I had not expected, have come into my hands as if by some unseen power. It is to be hoped that the information contained within these pages will help to sweep away the tragic errors that cloud the minds of the people as well as the physicians. It is urgent that the living words of TRUTH or some other force be applied to abolish that deadly weapon, THE POISONED NEEDLE, which has been the menacing road block standing m the way of progress in the healing field for these many years

Vaccination and the false germ theory upon which it is hinged has led mankind far astray and has severed the fragile thread that offered medical theory and practice a hope of becoming a science. Under the sway of our present degenerative medical methods the health of our people has declined to the lowest point in history. The 1955 survey showed that over 90% of our population is below par mentally or physically. According to life insurance records, army reports, hospital statements, government statistics and physical examinations for marriage certificates and employment, etc., it is revealed that there is hardly one normal, healthy person in a hundred. The Cancer Foundation states that one out of every four is marked for cancer. The figures on heart trouble are even worse than that and the other "killer diseases" come in for their toll. Practically all the rest of the people have symptoms of less serious diseases; these symptoms being headaches. constipation, weak eves, dental caries, colds, pain, stomach trouble, etc. Most, if not all, diseases are avoidable and curable (at a certain stage) but not under the deceptive medical method of poisoning the well and the sick with vaccines and drugs and mutilating them with unnecessary operations.

When socialized medicine was threatening, a meeting of medical officials was called to discuss just how many and which operations would really be necessary if there was no profit in it. It was decided that only 3% would be considered essential under those conditions. This information came from a medical student whose instructor had attended the meeting.

 WHERE HAVE THE "GREAT STRIDES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE" TAKEN US?

After a glance at the medical records covering the past 70 years of what boastfully called "our great strides of medical science" we can hardly help wondering if those seven league strides haven’t been in reverse, because there a marked decline in our nation’s health and a shocking increase in the killer diseases during those very years. The acute diseases that were to have been conquered by vaccination have only been masked and "save face" or suppressed until the retained poisons corroded the internal organs and developed into dangerous chronic diseases.

The following table gives us an idea of what our present faulty methods are doing to our race:

INCREASE IN KILLER DISEASES DURING THE PAST 70 YEARS....

Insanity increased 400%
Cancer increased 308%
Anemia increased 300%
Epilepsy increased 397%
Bright’s Disease increased 65%
Heart Disease increased 179%
Diabetes increased 1800% (In spite of or because of insulin)
Polio increased 680%
Never in the history of this country have preventable diseases flourished with such wild abandon, continuously being fed by the very drugs and commercialized irritants that set them into operation in the first place.

Dr. Alexis Carrel, of the Rockefeller Institute, stated: (Scientific Monthly, July, 1925):

"Although the adult individual today has much less chance of dying from smallpox, cholera, or typhoid, than he had 50 years ago, he surely has more prospect of being tortured by some form of cancer, afflicted with slow diseases of the kidneys, of the circulatory apparatus or the endocrine glands, and of going insane . . . Modern medicine protects him (attempts to) against infections which kill rapidly, but leaves him exposed to the slower and more cruel diseases."

Annie Riley Hale, in "The Medical Voodoo" speaks of "medicine as ‘a system of healing which after 5000 years of trial and error’ is describing itself as ‘a science in the making’, whose proudest showing to date is, that it has enabled the race to ‘swap’ smallpox for cancer and typhoid fever for diabetes and insanity, may still be worthy of credence and patronage by its devoted followers. But what justification can there be for putting the whole power of the government back of such a system, and the public treasury at its disposal, to spread misleading propaganda about its own peculiar doctrines and methods, to force them on the helpless?"

Although there are a number of far more successful and efficient systems of healing in this country, the medical system is the only one that gets endorsement and support from the government. All our tax supported Departments of Health, hospitals and institutions are under the domination of medical personnel. In spite of the financial support, public confidence and full scale experimentation and testing of all their methods and theories, the medical school of healing has utterly failed to control any of the killer diseases and doesn’t have a sure cure for even one of the mild diseases. Smallpox and other epidemics were largely controlled by improvements in sanitation and nutrition years before vaccination became popularized. Yet a tremendous sum of money is poured into the medical coffers every year with no accounting made for its use and no benefits received. Isn’t it time that this squandering of public funds be stopped and the better qualified practitioners be given a chance to salvage the wreckage before it is too late?

THE INSIDE STORY

After half a century of medical practice, Dr. John Tilden made the following observation, regarding inadequate medical procedures:

"Ability to cure has not kept pace with diagraosis, and today we behold the scientific paradox of skilled physicians sometimes knowing exactly what disease the patient is suffering with, but unable to cure the disease. . . Ability to diagnose, but impotence in curing, is the true status of scientific medicine.

"Clinicians are floundering about in a sea of speculation and uncertainty concerning cause and cure; and the best of them declare that autopsies prove that almost half of their diagnoses are wrong." (Dr. Charles Mayo, in a radio broadcast stated that at their clinic, autopsies show that they get only 20% diagnoses right.)

"Every part of the body is represented by a specialist. The irony of all this professional perfection (?) is summed up in a few words, namely, diagnosis is an elaborate system of summing up effects without a scintilla of knowledge of cause, and treatment is a stupendous scheme of palliation, with braggadocio concerning immunization. But the question will not down: How is a disease to be prevented or cured when the cause is unknown? All 400 or more so called diseases are nothing more than expressions of our general systematic derangement—states which I am pleased to name toxemia, or healing crises. Toxemia is a state of body poisoning — self generated or induced by vaccine serums, drugs or other poisons." ("Philosophy of Health," by Tilden)

R. T. Trall, M.D., was another doctor who gave the medical method a long and thorough trial before abandoning it as a failure. He turned to nature and its simplicity and upon its sound basic laws of healing he brought about miracles of recovery from all diseases. After trying to justify the inconsistencies of medical theory he had this to say:

"Why has not success in treating disease kept pace with the extraordinary progress of knowledge of other sciences? The answer is ready: A successful practice of the healing art must be based upon the laws of life, the economy of vitality. The only foundation, therefore, of true healing is correct physiological principles; and here is precisely where the whole orthodox medical system of the present day fails — utterly and totally fails. It has no physiological and biological science upon which to truly practice the healing art."

These are strong words coming from medical doctors who know the system thoroughly. Medicine is a paying game — financially speaking — and for successful practitioners to leave it for the sake of honesty, integrity, and idealism. indicates that these cherished qualities are lacking in that branch of business.

It is this lack of correct physiological and biological principles that has enabled the medical profession to foist such an unscientific delusion as vaccination on the public.

VACCINATION IS BASED ON A FALSE PREMISE

The false "germ theory" of disease, upon which vaccination is based, has been the "blind leader of the blind" that has dragged the medical system and the Impressionable public deeper into the morass of confusion and disease. (The germ theory is discussed at length in the chapter titled ON FRIENDLY TERMS WITH GERMS in Book II.) However, our present concern, in this chapter, is

merely to point out the instability of the nebulous theory of "anti-bodies" which is the main prop that holds up the dead corpse of vaccination. In volume 6 of THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM, Dr. Herbert M. Shelton brings into sharper focus this "tricky" subject of anti-bodies. These elusive little nothings have fooled the people and served the uses of the doctors but have vanished into theory when subjected to the clear light of scientific investigation.

Dr. Shelton writes: "The whole of the modern medical practice of vaccine, serum and antitoxin therapy is based upon the supposition that the body manufactures substances called anti-toxins, anti-bodies, antigens, etc., which are capable of meeting and destroying toxins that get into the body. The idea seems to be sound, although it is possible that the work of destroying such toxins is that of the detoxification carried on by the liver, and lymph glands, etc. Anti-toxins, antibodies, antigens, etc., have never been isolated. They have only been assumed, while the practice based upon their assumed existence has been both a failure and disaster. However, this may not be due to their non-existence. If they exist it is impossible to separate them from the proteins of the animal’s blood (in making vaccines) and these proteins when injected directly into the blood of another animal (or human being) are very poisonous. Besides this, there is no evidence that the anti-toxins of one species can be made use of by another species. Where vaccines are employed, it constitutes the introduction of actual disease matter into the blood. That is, the supposed causitive germs or some product of the disease is introduced into the body. The consequences are often terrible. Real benefits are never observed.

"If the hypothesis that the body manufactures anti-toxins, anti-bodies, etc., is correct it still remains to be proven that the body ever manufactures these greatly in excess of the need for them. It cannot be shown that ‘free’ anti-toxin, anti-bodies, etc., are suspended in the blood serum and can therefore be transferred to another animal in sufficient quantities to be of use to the receiving animal. In keeping with a general law of life, it is very probable that the body does manufacture an excess of anti-bodies, but it cannot be shown that it retains these after the need for them has ceased. On the contrary, in keeping with another general law of life, it is very probable that the body begins to get rid of them the very instant the need for them ceases. If they exist they are chemical substances produced to meet an emergency and will be cast out as soon as the emergency ceases to exist."

The renowned Dr. Antoine Bechamp, one of the world’s foremost scientists and bacteriologists, observed that the micro-organisms that are ordinarily called germs, evolve out of decaying cells they helped to build, and take part in the decomposing of the ever changing life substance and help to form it into material usable again by nature. Thus, when germs are found within a sick body it is not that they entered from outside and caused the disease. It is because they developed from the decaying cells within the body and have an important part to play in helping to handle the waste and destruction brought about by serums, drugs and other poisons forced upon the body from without. Perhaps our modern bacteriologists have seen this activity of the "microzymas" and jumped to the conclusion that they are anti-bodies fighting disease and that they (the doctors) must inject more oL them into the body by way of vaccines. But anyone with common sense and reasoning can see that this would only interfere and disrupt the well organized efforts of nature. This is the reason why vaccination has taken such a heavy toll of lives and has produced such widespread disease.

"Nature makes no mistakes and violates no laws. She is uniformly governed by fixed principles and all her actions harmonize with the laws that govern these actions." (THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM, p. 48 — Shelton —)

"The best, indeed the only, method of promoting individual and public health is to teach people the laws of nature and thus teach them how to preserve their health. Immunization programs are futile and are based on the delusions that the law of cause and effect can be annulled. Vaccines and serums are employed as substitutes for right living; they are intended to supplant obedience to the laws of life. Such programs are slaps in the face of law and order. Belief in immunization is a form of delusional insanity." (PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL HEALING — p. 478 — Shelton)

VACCINATION LOWERS RESISTANCE AND INVITES DISEASE

Dr. J. W. Hodge had considerable experience with vaccination before he denounced it and wrote a book on his collected data. In his book THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION (p. 41) he states:

"After a thorough investigation of the most authentic records and facts in harmony with the physician’s daily observations and experiences, the conclusion is drawn that instead of protecting its subjects from contagion of smallpox, vaccination actually renders them more susceptible to it. Vaccination is the implantation of disease — that is its admitted purpose. Health is the ideal state to be sought, not disease . . . Every pathogenic disturbance in the infected organism wastes and lowers the vital powers, and thus diminishes its natural resisting capacity.

"This fact is well known and so universally conceded that it seems superfluous to cite authorities. Nevertheless, I shall mention one. The International Textbook of Surgery. Vol. 1. p. 263, is authority for the following statement:

"‘Persons weakened by disease or worn out by excessive labor yield more readily to infection that healthy individuals.’

"If this is true, it explains why, in various epidemics, smallpox always attacks the vaccinated first, and why these diseases continue to infest the civilized world while its allied (unvaccinated) ‘filth diseases ‘ have disappeared before the advance of civilization, through the good offices of sanitation, hygiene and improved nutrition."

SUMMARIZING THE CASE AGAINST VACCINATION

Dr. Hodge continues:

"After a careful consideration of the history of vaccination gleaned from an impartial and comprehensive study of vital statistics, and pertinent data from every reliable source and after an experience derived from having vaccinated 3,000 subjects, I am firmly convinced that vaccination cannot be shown to have any logical relation to the diminution of cases of smallpox, and —

"1 — That the practice of vaccination has been the means of disseminating some of the most fatal and loathsome diseases, such as leprosy, syphilis, tetanus and tuberculosis;
2 — That vaccination is not only useless, but positively injurious,
of protecting its subjects from contagion of smallpox, it actually renders them more susceptible to it by depressing the vital power and diminishing natural resistance;
3 — That immunity from all diseases is to be realized through the attainment of health, not by the propagation of disease;
"4 — That it is never necessary to set up one disease in a healthy organism to protect against another; that such procedure is an appalling violation of the basic principles of hygiene and sanitary science;
5 — That the performance of the vaccine operation in the very nature of the case, violates the cardinal precepts of modern aseptic surgery, the aim of which is to exclude the products of disease from the organism, and never to introduce them;
6 — That there is no evidence worthy of the name, on record, to prove that vaccination either prevents or mitigates smallpox;
7 — That many healthy children have died from the effects of vaccination;
8 — That millions of vaccinated people have died of confluent smallpox while having the plainest vaccine scars on their bodies;
9 — That smallpox epidemics invariably attack the vaccinated first;
10 — That smallpox follows closely upon flagrant violation of the laws of health, hygiene and sanitation;
11 — That the occurrence of all the great epidemics of smallpox have coincided with periods of sanitary neglect;
12 — That cow-pox and venereal-pox have much in common;
13 — That the analogy between the manifestations of vaccine and those of syphilis is so close that several of the most eminent pathologists of the world regard cow-pox as a modified form of syphilis;
"14 — That the so called, ‘spontaneous cow-pox’ is a myth; that cow-pox is a disorder not natural to the cow; that it never occurs in bulls or steers, nor in young heifers that have never been milked; that it is a disease of milk cows, which has been communicated to them from sores on hands of milkers who were suffering from syphilis;
"15 — That the serious killer diseases such as cancer, syphilis, heart trouble, polio, tuberculosis, etc., will never be eliminated as long as blood pollution through vaccination is continued;
"16 — That the community that has sanitary surroundings, a pure water supply, wholesome food, good health and freedom from the blood-poisoning effects of vaccination, need have no fear of smallpox or any other diseases;
"17 — That no man can be truly said to be susceptible to the contagion of smallpox or to that of any other disease so long as he is in a state of perfect health;
"18 — That such a state resists and repels the assaults of all morbific influences and is therefore the best protective against disease;
"19 — That vaccination has utterly failed to fulfill the promises made for it by Jenner and his followers and that he saddled a legacy of disease and death upon the race for which he was paid $150,000 by the British government;
"20 — That compulsory vaccination ranks with human slavery and religious persecution, as one of the most flagrant outrages upon the rights of the human race."
"21 — That Switzerland, England, Australia and other enlightened countries abolished compulsory vaccination after it was tested and proved to be disastrous; but laws sanctioning this crime still disgrace the statute books of "free" America.
"22 — That reforms are not made by those who profit by them so the doctors or the government cannot be depended upon to abolish vaccination of their own volition; that the people, themselves, must rise up and make demands for freedom from this curse of greed, ignorance and destruction, for only then can we hope to see the light of a new day of health, progress and harmonious adjustment.

CHAPTER II
SMALLPOX DECLINED BEFORE VACCINATION WAS ENFORCED

"To mistake inferences or axioms for facts has been a curse of science."—Sir Clifford Albutt, in "Nature."

The simple fact that we have less smallpox now than we did 200 years ago, does not in any degree prove that vaccination caused this decline, although the promoters of vaccination have taken upon themselves the full credit for this improvement.

The most noticeable decrease in smallpox and other zymotic diseases began with the sanitation reforms just prior to 1800 and the improvement in nutrition brought about by such health crusaders as Trail, Graham and Jennings around 1840.

THIS SANITATION AND HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM included: (1) Sewage disposal, (2) cleaning of streets, back yards, stables, etc., (3) improvement of roads so that fresh vegetables, milk and other vital foods could be transported rapidly to the cities and distributed while still fresh. (4) The water supply was improved and protected from contamination. (5) Housing projects were built out in the suburbs to relieve congestion of population in the cities.

THE NUTRITIONAL TEACHINGS stressed natural whole grain bread instead of white bread, fresh fruits and vegetables free from salt, sugar, chemicals and other harmful preservatives and the rejection of coffee, tea, alcohol, tobacco, drugs and other drastic poisons. Meat and other low grade proteins were denounced in favor of nuts, beans and other such proteins with more health value and less toxic effects.

The age-old "terror diseases" such as plague, black death, cholera, etc., that were previously believed to be contagious, responded at once to this health program and soon declined to the vanishing point in countries that adopted the sanitation and nutrition improvements. They are diseases of nutritional deficiency and imbalance just the same as all other diseases.

A glance at the following table of official statistics from England and Wales shows us how smallpox deaths declined only after the people began their opposition to the vaccination law and an ever increasing number refused to be vaccinated.

CHART SHOWING DECREASE IN SMALLPOX DEATHS AFTER DECLINE OF VACCINATION

Period -                Percentage of Births Vaccinated Smallpox Deaths

1872-1881   96.5                                          3,708.3
1882-1891   82.1                                             933.0
1892-1901  67.9                                             436.5
1902-1911  67.6                                             395.3
1912-1921  42.3                                               12.2
1922-193 1  43.1                                                25.0
1932-1941  39.9                                                  1.4

Here we see that at the time when nearly all (96.5%) of the babies were vaccinated, smallpox caused almost 4,000 deaths in that 10 year period; but, when the vaccinations were resisted until only 39% would submit to it, the death-rate dropped down to only 1.4 cases.

Before the passage of England’s compulsory vaccination law in 1853, the highest authentic smallpox death-rate was only 2,000 for any two year period, even during their most serious smallpox epidemics; whereas, after almost 20 years of compulsory vaccination there occurred the most devastating scourge of smallpox in 1870 to 1871 that the world has ever known. It took 23,062 lives in England and Wales and spread over Europe in all the countries where vaccination and inoculation had been practiced on a large scale. After that the vaccination laws were enforced even more rigidly until the people began to notice that smallpox was not decreasing by this practice but continued to ravage the homes of the vaccinated. During the same epidemic in Germany 124,948 people died of smallpox. All had been vaccinated (according to their carefully kept records.) "In Berlin alone no less that 17,038 persons had smallpox after vaccination, and 2,884 of them died."

In Sheffield, England where 97 per cent of her 200,000 inhabitants had been thoroughly and frequently vaccinated for many years a smallpox epidemic swept the city in 1887 that caused 7,101 cases and 648 deaths.

Preceding this, the large manufacturing town of Leicester, (England) which had been even more thoroughly vaccinated up to the time of the 1870 epidemic was the hardest hit of all the communities with over 3,500 deaths per million in the first year of the epidemic. This completely destroyed their faith in vaccination and the rich and poor alike rejected it and adopted sanitation with the result that smallpox epidemics were soon eliminated from that city.

STATEMENTS OF HEALTH OFFICIALS REGARDING VACCINATED SMALLPOX

Sir Thomas Chambers, Q.C.M.P., recorder of the city of London said:

"I find that of the 155 persons admitted to the Smallpox Hospital in the Parish of St. James, Piccadilly, 145 had been vaccinated."

In Marylevore Hospital 92 per cent of the smallpox cases had been vaccinated.

Marson’s report of Highgate Hospital for 1871 states that, "of the 950 cases of smallpox, 870 (90%) of the whole number of patients had been vaccinated."

At Hempstead Hospital, up to May 13, 1884, out of 2,965 admissions for smallpox, 2,347 had been vaccinated.

After these vaccination epidemics, more and more people refused to comply with the unjust vaccination laws and as a result of this and the improvements in sanitation and nutrition, smallpox took a drop and continued to decline until it is rarely seen at the present time.

"In 1942 one case of smallpox at Seindon (Britain) resulted in the vaccination of a large number of people. Only three cases of smallpox occurred and these all recovered, but 12 vaccinated individuals died from inflammation of the brain. (This is a common after effect of vaccination.) In the same year near Edinburg, Scotland, eight people died of smallpox (six of which had been vaccinated) while ten died from the effects of the vaccination. .

"I would not go so far as to say that vaccination has never saved a person from smallpox. It is a matter of record that thousands of the victims of this superstitious rite have been saved from smallpox by the immunizing potency of death. But it is a fact that the official statistics of England and Wales show unmistakably that, while vaccination has killed ten times more people than smallpox, there has been a decrease in smallpox concomitant with the decrease in vaccination. . . It might be appropriately asked, in the words of the Vaccination Inquirer (London, Feb. 1947) ‘How could an operation that was declining be responsible for the extermination of smallpox?" (Vaccine and Serum Evils, p. 23, by Dr. H. M. Shelton)

UNVACCINATED DISEASES DECLINED FASTER THAN VACCINATED SMALLPOX

Records in all countries show that the so-called, contagious diseases declined quite rapidly with the introduction of sanitation and nutrition reforms, with the exception of smallpox and diphtheria which were kept active by vaccination in a large number of authenticated cases. The following condensed records from various countries give a cross section of the available evidence that bears out this point.

REPORT FROM BRITISH INDIA

In 1929 while India was still under British rule with its compulsory vaccination laws, the League of Nations’ Health League referred to India as, "the greatest center of smallpox in the world today." The records show that in the large cities where vaccination enforcement was most rigid "the smallpox death rate has been generally far greater than for the country as a whole" where complete enforcement is not possible.

The report of the League of Nations’ Health Division for Oct. 1953 reluctantly admits vaccination is not all it ought to be when it says in part: "In spite of the great efforts made by the health authorities in promoting vaccination, smallpox is not on the point of extinction."

After the limited health improvement programs we find that the plagues and scourges, all declined noticeably except smallpox and respiratory diseases (tuberculosis) which is a common after effect of vaccination.

Edward Jenner had promised that vaccination would wipe out instead, all other diseases, even the most persistent and deadly more rapidly without any serums than did smallpox with its repeated vaccinations.

Around 1900, after the improvements in health due to sanitation and nutrition had had time to be weighed against that of vaccination, most of the people of England began to refuse vaccination, which resulted in a greater decline in smallpox, but in certain cities of India the British government was still able to keep up rigid enforcement. The following chart shows the high smallpox death-rate in three of these Indian cities as compared to the decreased death-rate in London after the clean up (health) campaign:

AVERAGE ANNUAL SMALLPOX DEATH RATE PER MILLION PEOPLE

WORLD’S WORST RECORD IN MEXICO

Although India was reported by the League of Nations as the greatest center of smallpox in the world in 1929 it has improved since gaining its freedom from Britain and relaxing its vaccination enforcement program. This leaves the over vaccinated country of Mexico holding the dubious honor as the world’s worst smallpox center.

The following chart shows the comparison between Mexico with its sparse population of 16,500,000 (1930 figures — approx.) and British India with its dense, congested population (300,000,000 — approx.) In spite of the disease breeding conditions of India’s cities with inadequate sanitation, nutrition and housing facilities and the polluted water, lack of sewers, extreme heat, etc., the smallpox death rate is far lower than that of completely vaccinated Mexico.

SMALLPOX DEATHS AND DEATH-RATES PER POPULATION

This black record could exist only in a country where vaccination laws are rigidly enforced. The Mexican law prescribes:

"(1) Children must be vaccinated within four months of birth.
(2) One compulsory vaccination and one compulsory re-vaccination for all inhabitants, within the time limits and in the manner and under the conditions specified by the Public Health Council.
(3) All persons are obliged to have themselves re-vaccinated at least once every five years, and may be required to do so more frequently whenever the health authorities so determine.
(4) The Army Medical Service vaccinates all soldiers. Employees in commercial, industrial, etc., establishments must have all persons in their employ vaccinated within the time-limits laid down."

In spite of the constant recurrence of smallpox epidemics cultivated by vaccination, this medical dictatorship continues to rule with an iron hand. If the Mexicans were not a hardy people by nature they would have been destroyed by this time reduced to imbecility, by this continuous blood poisoning practice.

In Jenner’s day, smallpox was practically unknown in Mexico for which he promptly claimed the credit. In 1811 Jenner wrote to Dr. Lettson as follows:

"For the great and grand effects of vaccination the eye must quit this little spot (England) and survey it among other European countries and still more particularly among the vast empires of Asia and America. In Mexico and Peru the disease is nearly extinct.

Jenner didn’t wait around to see the results of his terrible invention. Even he admits that smallpox was almost unknown when he started his work of destruction. Today, vaccination has so intensified the development of smallpox that all vaccinated Mexicans have either had it or are in danger of getting it.

Mexico has had the good sense to abolish the barbarous practice of capital punishment and the cruel and useless practice of vivisection which puts that country a step ahead of United States in that respect. It is to be hoped that those people who fought so hard for freedom and democracy will also be able to throw off the heavy yoke of medical oppression.

EVIDENCE FROM ITALY

Dr. Charles Ruta, professor of Materia Medica at Parugia University, Italy, presents some interesting figures comparing the smallpox deaths of the vaccinated soldiers with the women and boys outside the armed services. Vaccination is stressed in that country (which accounts for the high smallpox rate among all ages) but more thoroughly enforced in the Army. The boys are inducted at the age of 20 years. The figures show the death-rate from smallpox is about twice as high among men over 20 (soldiers) as among women of the same age.

SMALLPOX DEATH-RATE OF THOROUGHLY VACCINATED ITALIAN SOLDIERS COMPARED WITH THE LESS VACCINATED WOMEN AND BOYS

Dr. Ruta traced the records for many years following this published record and the results continued with the same high death-rate among the completely vaccinated soldiers and with the lower death-rate among the rest of the population.

Although England was the first country to adopt compulsory vaccination laws her people soon found it was a disastrous practice and fought to have the law abolished. About the time of the First World War the English people had succeeded enough in resisting the law to notice a considerable decrease in small-pox, aided of course by the sanitation program. Germany and Italy were still trying to enforce vaccination on the entire population. The following chart shows a comparison of the smallpox deaths of the three countries:

CHART SHOWING INCREASE OF SMALLPOX UNDER COMPULSORY VACCINATION

HIGH SMALLPOX RATE IN VACCINATED EGYPT

The League of Nations’ Monthly Health report for October 15, 1929, gives a report on Egypt with an effort toward justifying the re-occurring smallpox epidemics in spite of the compulsory vaccination laws. However, the "whitewash" doesn’t cover the inefficacy of this useless practice. The report states:

"In Egypt, vaccination is compulsory under the Decree of 1890. . . Penalties are provided for infringements . . . It has not been found possible as yet to enforce vaccination everywhere, and smallpox continues to claim a fair number of victims every year. The last great epidemic broke out in 1919 and extended into 1920. More than five and a half million persons were vaccinated during these two years, and this completely arrested the spread of the epidemic. In 1921, the number of cases had gone down to 92 as compared with 7,895 in 1919 and 3,004 in 1920."

The epidemic wore itself out in two years and the vaccinators claimed that it was the serum that arrested it. If vaccination could arrest an epidemic at all, it should - certainly do it in less than two years. If there had been no vaccination at all there would have been a much lower smallpox rate as is proved by world records where the facts are not falsified.

The fact that there was less smallpox the following year was no proof that vaccination curbed it. Isn’t it quite logical that all those who were in a condition to develop it did so during the long two year epidemic, so there would not be many to contract it the following year?

The following report put out by the League of Nations’ Health (?) department is a typical example of how the medical schemers influence the average, unthinking person with data that appears to be true and convincing.

"NORTHERN AFRICA — As vaccination progresses, the most remarkable success is being achieved in Egypt which in 1926 had 2,677 cases with 544 deaths. But in 1930 it (smallpox) caused only 14 cases without deaths. . . This is undoubtedly due to the vaccination campaign begun at the end of 1925 and completed in 1926. Approximately 14,600,000 vaccinations were performed, thus reaching practically the whole population."

Here we have a number of statements that are hard to reconcile with known facts. For instance: (1) In June 1925, the population of Egypt was estimated to be 13,964,900 yet the report said they gave 14,660,000 vaccinations. Since there are more vaccinations reported than people, either the figures are fabricated or the vaccinators didn’t really believe in vaccination and knew it would not protect for even one year so they re-vaccinated thousands of people with the vain hope that the repetition of failure would in some way reap success.
(2) In the first report they blamed the frequent outbreaks of smallpox on the claim that it was impossible to enforce vaccination on all the people. Yet their figures in the second record showed the number of vaccinations exceeded the population.
(3) The first report stated that their widespread vaccination campaign in 1920 which reached 5,500,000 people had completely arrested smallpox and the following report of 1931 made it clear that the complete and thorough vaccination campaign succeeded in conquering smallpox, even to the point where there were no deaths at all from that cause. This type of propaganda has a tendency to lull the people into a sense of false security which leaves the real cause of disease unchecked. Let’s follow the record a little farther and see what happened.

The five and a half million vaccinations in 1920 were supposed to have brought smallpox under control, yet in 1926 (only 6 years later) the second report tells of a sweeping smallpox epidemic in which 2,677 were stricken and 544 died.

In spite of the 5,500,000 vaccinations in 1920 and the 14,600,000 vaccination in 1926 and all the vaccinations in the intervening years, including the compulsory vaccinations of all infants, there occurred another larger and more terrible smallpox epidemic in 1932 (only 6 years after the alleged complete control of smallpox in Egypt). This sweeping epidemic continued for two years, aggravated, of course, by the meddling vaccinators. By the end of 1934, 7,650 cases had been reported of which 1,373 had died. Where is the remarkable success of vaccination boasted of by the medical faction of the League of Nations?

"These figures speak for themselves and eloquently proclaim the utter futility of vaccination as a preventive or mitigant of smallpox." (Swan — "The Vaccination Problem" — p.291.)

LEAGUE OF NATIONS HEALTH COMMITTEE IN THE DARK

In their monthly Epidemiological Report (RE 132) dated Nov 15, 1929, this one time great organization revealed its biased confusion on health matters by stating:

‘It will therefore be plain that, if the conclusions are to be accepted, and allowing for individual peculiarities, re-vaccination should be repeated, three or four years at least, or even more often."

Joseph Swan comments on this in his book ‘The Vaccination Problem’ page 288 by saying ‘All these demands for frequent re-vaccination may be to an absurdity by asking a simple question — ‘How is it that in England, abandonment of even primary vaccination by approximately half the parents during the past 25 years, and the almost entire neglect of re-vaccination at any age, have been accompanied by the lowest smallpox mortality rate on record?"

After smallpox vaccination was found to be so financially profitable doctors and serum manufacturers, serums for other diseases were invented and enforced with the same financial increase but also with the same decrease in the elimination of the disease. Diphtheria is one of the most notable examples of this.

The following table is one of the many records that show how the unvaccinated diseases declined more rapidly than those that were supposed to be wiped out or controlled by vaccines. (This report was compiled before serums were invented for the other diseases shown.)

CHART SHOWING DECLINE OF DISEASE WITHOUT VACCINATION (England and Wales) Death-rate per million children living. (Ages, between birth and 15 years.)

Here we see that measles decreased 94.1 per cent during this period; scarlet fever decreased 99.7 per cent; whooping cough decreased 91 per cent while diphtheria, the disease that was supposed to be conquered by serum immunization decreased only 88.8 per cent which was the least of all. If left alone it would have declined at the same rate as the others, or even faster because it was the least prevalent.

It will be noted that in 1861 diphtheria was the least fatal of the children’s diseases. But according to this report of the Ministry of Health, the 1948 record shows it to have increased to the second most deadly of the children killers with its 105 deaths per million, while whooping cough was only slightly higher with 121 deaths.

Another report issued by the British Ministry of Health gives the diphtheria death-rate from among 4,000,000 children who were not immunized. It gives a five year period (1945 to 1949) in which the diphtheria death-rate declined from 551 cases in 1945 down to 63 in 1949. What caused this phenomenal drop of 87 per cent in only five years when the record of immunized children showed a decline of only 88 per cent in an 87 year period of immunization? The credit cannot be claimed by the serum makers because these children were not "protected" (?) by any vaccines.

The Ministry of Health attributed the rapid decline of the other diseases, to improvements in sanitation, nutrition, housing, education and social conditions, but diphtheria and smallpox were claimed to have declined because of "prophylactics." If vaccination and immunization were preventives of smallpox and diphtheria they should at least keep pace with the decline of other diseases.

IMMUNIZATION INCREASED DIPHTHERIA IN SOME COUNTRIES

Although France had rejected immunization after seeing the disasters that followed its use she was pressured into submitting to it after German occupation. By 1941 most of the French children had been inoculated after which the diphtheria incidence rose to 13,795 by the end of that year. By 1943, diphtheria had increased to 46,750.

At the beginning of the Second World War immunization was made compulsory in Germany and the diphtheria rate soared up to 150,000 cases (1939) while in unvaccinated Norway there were only 50 cases.

Space in this chapter does not permit the reviewing of the numerous records that condemn immunization. More on this subject will be given in the chapter on DIPHTHERIA AND IMMUNIZATION in Book II.

DECLINE OF VACCINATION IN UNITED STATES

The over-all picture for United States has been toward a steady decline in smallpox since the gradual abandonment of vaccination laws in the various states. Only a few of the more backward states and some of the medically dominated institutions and businesses still impose compulsory vaccination laws on the people. In 1902 when vaccination was endorsed by the majority, the death-rate from smallpox was 2,121. By 1910, vaccination disasters had caused it to lose favor to such an extent that the smallpox death-rate dropped down to 202. The serum makers used the frenzy of the First World War to work up a nation wide vaccination campaign that raised the smallpox death-rate up to 358 (1919) and by 1921 it had increased to 642. When the people began to notice that the vaccinated were the ones who suffered the worst from smallpox and flu (an after effect of vaccination) they lost faith in it to a large extent and by 1927 the deaths dropped down to 138 where it has been fluctuating every since.

In contrast to our diminished smallpox rate under optioned vaccination we have an excellent example of compulsory vaccination in our (U.S.) dominated Philippine Islands. In a 10 year period (1911-1920) 24,436,889 vaccinations were given which resulted in 75,339 deaths. Before vaccination was introduced the highest death-rate in the Philippines, even during epidemics was only 10 per cent of the population. After many years of thorough vaccination and re-vaccination the death-rate rose to 74 per cent which is the highest in history. In United States (1919) when vaccination was indifferently accepted, the death rate from smallpox was only 358, while in the Philippines (1919) under strict vaccination enforcement the death-rate from this cause was 18,213. In 1920 in vaccinated Italy, the smallpox death-rate was 12,155 as compared to only 508 in United States during the same period.

In spite of these cold facts and thousands of others like them, the promoters of vaccines insist that vaccination has been a blessing to the world and has reduced disease. This all goes to prove the old saying that figures can’t lie but liars can figure.

INOCULATE THE DOCTORS

Inoculate for small-pox
Inoculate for mumps;
Inoculate for typhoid
For colds and nervous slumps;
Inoculate with cow pus
And germs of every brand
Inoculate with monkey glands
To make us young again.
But one fine day the laity
Will move in self-defence
To inoculate the doctors
With a little common sense.
—by a medical student, Winnipeg, Canada

CHAPTER 3
VACCINATION HIT BY DOCTORS

It often heppens that the universal belief of one age - a belief which no one was, not without an extraordinary effort of genius and courage could, at that time be free - becomes to a subsequent age se palpable an absurdity that the only difficulty, then, is to imagine how such a thing can ever have appeared credible.---John Stuart Mill.

From its inception down to the present time vaccination has been denounced as dangerous, disease producing and even deadly, by all thinking doctors who have investigated the facts and have had the courage to voice them.

A few of these published statements from prominent doctors are presented here:

From Dr. Alexander Wilder, Editor of the New Yolk Medical Times, Professor of Pathology in the United States Medical College of New York and author of WILDER'S HISTORY OF MEDICINE, we have this observation:

"Vaccination is the infusion of contaminating element into the system, and after such contamination you can never be sure of regaining the former purity of the body. Consumption follows in the wake of vaccination as certainly as effect follows cause."

Dr. Walter M. James of Philadelphia says:

"Vaccination does not stay the spread of smallpox nor even modify it in those who get it after vaccination. It does introduce into the system, and therefore contributes to the spread of, tuberculosis, cancer and even leprosy. It tends to make more virulent epidemics of smallpox and to make them more extensive. It does just what inoculation did - cause the spread of disease."

        Dr. Kalb, Royal Examiner of Statistics for Bavaria, states:

"Examination shows vaccination a complete failure. In this single year, 3,994 vaccinated people died of smallpox; the total number attacked exceeded 29,000." (All were vaccinated.)

Dr. L Hall Bakewell, Vaccinator General of Trinidad said:

"I have very little faith in Vaccination even as modifying the disease, and none at all as a protective in virulent epidemics. Personally, I contracted smallpox less than six months after a most severe re-vaccination."

This doctor was in the vaccination business; his livelihood depended on it and he wanted to believe in it. In Trinidad where vaccination was compulsory he had ample opportunity to observe the full effects of it on a large scale, yet he voluntarily denounced the practice as a failure.

        Dr. L C. Carter of London reports:

"In looking over the history of vaccination for smallpox, I am amazed to learn of the terrible deaths from vaccination, amputations of arms and leg., foot and mouth disease, tetanus (1ockjaw), septicemia (bood poisoning), cerebro-spinal meningitis."

        Dr. J. C. Ward M.R.C.S. at Harrogate, (England) among many others confesses to a change of heart on the vaccination question in this statement:

"I believed that vaccination prevented smallpox. I believed that if it did not absolutely prevent it in every case, it modified the disease in some cases, and I believed that re-vaccination, if only frequent enough, gave absolute immunity. Experience has driven all that out of my head; I have seen vaccinated persons get smallpox, and persons who had been vaccinated get smallpox, and I have seen those who had had smallpox get it a second time and die of it."

Professor Adolf Vogt, who held the chair of vital Statistics and Hygiene in Berne University for 17 years said:

"After collecting the particulars of 400,000 cases of small pox I am compelled to admit that my belief in vaccination is absolutely destroyed."

Dr. Charles E. Page of Boston said:

"I have been a regular practitioner of medicine in Boston for 33 years. I have studied the question of vaccination conscientiously for 45 years. As for vaccination as a preventative of disease, there is not a scrap of evidence in its favor. Injection of virus into the pure bloodstream of the people does not prevent Smallpox. Rather, it tends to increase its epidemics and makes the disease more deadly. Of this we have indisputable proof. In our country (U.S.) cancer mortality has increased from 9 per 100,000 to 80 per 100,000 or fully 900 per cent increase, within the past 50 years, and no conceivable thing could have caused this but the universal blood poisoning now existing."

Dr. Forbes Laurie says:

"I can add my testimony to the others . . . that vaccination contributes to the great increase in cancer.

GOVERNOR HAS SUSPICIONS

Hon. Percival P. Baxter, Governor of Maine (1924) stated:

"Personally I have grave doubts as to the efficacy of modern serums and vaccines and am convinced that commercialism has exercised a considerable influence upon some phases of modem medicine."

Dr. William Howard Hay of Buffalo, New York said:

"We have no proof of the boasted effectiveness of any form of anti-toxin, vaccine or serum. The true figures on vaccination for smallpox have never gotten before the public, though they can be seen in the files of the various departments of the Army as well as the government, if one cares to look for them. If the record of vaccination in the Philippines alone were ever to become a matter of general knowledge it would finish vaccination in the whole country, at least among those who are able to read and think for themselves. After three years of the most rigid vaccination, when every Philippino had been vaccinated from one to six times, there occurred the severest epidemic of smallpox that the Islands had ever seen, with a death-rate running in places to over 70 per cent, and in all, well over 60,000 deaths. Is it any wonder the public is getting a little suspicious of us and our vaunted 'medical discoveries?' The wonder to me is that there are still millions of them willing to submit to vaccination and serum treatment."

Alfred Russell Wallace D.D. who spent many years doing research all over the world, collecting data on both sides of the vaccination question had this to say:

"While utterly powerless for good, vaccination is a certain cause of disease and death in many cases and is the probable cause of about 10,000 deaths annually in England, by five diseases of the most terrible and disgusting character."

L F. Cornell, M.D., President of the Homeopathic Medical Society of New York said: (1868)

It is my firm conviction that vaccination has been a curse instead of a blessing to the race. Every physician knows that cutaneous (pertaining to the skin) diseases have increased in frequency, severity, and variety to an alarming extent. To what is this increase owing? Contagion may account for some of the varieties; in a large majority, however, to no medium of transmission is the wide spread dissemination of this class of diseases so largely indebted as to vaccination."

Dr. E. M. Ripley, of Unionville, Connecticut, stated in a public address delivered in New Britain, Connecticut:

"Never in the history of medicine has there been produced so false a theory, such fraudulent assumptions, such disastrous and damning results as have followed the practice of vaccination; it is the ultima thule (extremity) of learned quackery, and lacks, and has ever lacked, the faintest shadow of a scientific basis. The fears of the people have been played upon as to the dangers of smallpox and the sure prevention by vaccination, until nearly the whole civilized world has become physically corrupted by its practice.

"The life-blood of nations has become the cesspool of vaccinators wherein they have poured the foul excretions that are thrown off from diseased beasts, nature adjudging it too vile to contaminate the system of any living creature.

SCROFULA, that hydra-headed monster of pathology, whose ramifications extend into and complicate nearly all the diseases that flesh is heir to, and whose victims are as the sands of the seashore in number, is one of the oldest children of vaccine poisoning.

"SYPHILIS, that disreputable disorder, that sinks its victims below the scale of decency, and hounds them to dishonorable graves, has been carried by the vaccinator's needle into the homes of the innocent and virtuous, and there, with consequent suffering that defies the imagination of man to depict."

Dr. J. Peebles (M.D.,Ph.D.) in his hook "VACCINATION A MENACE TO PERSONAL LIBERTY" wrote:

"When a mad dog enters a community and bites a child, the whole population rises up and demands the death of the creature, and desires that all available means be immediately used to eliminate from the system of the child the virus that has been so cruelly inserted. The action of the people in this case is a very natural one; but let me tell you that where tile bite of a mad dog has caused death in one case, the mad doctor with his calf-lymph and poisoned needle has caused tens of thousands of deaths.

"Vaccination is the most outrageous insult that can be offered to any pure-minded man or woman. It is the boldest and most impious attempt to mar the works of God that has been attempted for ages. The stupid blunder of doctor-craft has wrought all the evil that it ought, and it is time that free American citizens arise in their might and blot out the whole blood-poisoning business."

Dr. Thomas Morgan, in his "MEDICAL DELUSIONS" (page 6) writes:

"At the present time, the medical profession prescribes innumerable poisons, such as arsenic, strychnine, morphine, mercury and other destructive drugs that ruin the health of the human race . . . and the greatest of all delusions is the GERM THEORY, and the consequent introduction of serum therapy, with its various antitoxins

"Notwithstanding the fact that these medical delusions have been the cause of more injury and death than pestilence, famine and war combined, the medical doctors have agreed to meet each other half way, on the common ground of self-interest, for the purpose of formulating and enforcing the tyrannical laws to prevent anyone outside their ring from practicing medicine."

The following public confession was made by J. W. HODGE M. D. of Niagara Falls, New York:

"To affirm that there never has been any scientific warranty for a belief in the alleged protective virtues of vaccination and that its practice is backed by ignorance and indifference, is a sorry charge to make against the medical profession...but the charge, I regret to say is only too true. I know whereof I affirm, for I, too, must plead guilty of the charge. Before discovering my mistake I had vaccinated more than 3,000 victims, ignorantly supposing the disease I was propagating to be a preventative of smallpox. Having taken for granted what my teachers had asserted, I was a staunch believer in the alleged efficacy of vaccination as a prophylactic against smallpox. I remained in this blind and blissful state of ignorance for several years, and not until I acquired a little experience in the school of observation and reflection did I discover that my faith was pinned to a shameful fraud.

"The first real eye-opener I received upon the subject was while I was practicing my profession in Lockport. At that time (1902) smallpox made its appearance in this city and soon attained the proportions of an epidemic. At the outbreak of the disease more vaccinations were ordered by the Department of Health and I was officially appointed Public Vaccinator. My duty was to go from house to house and vaccinate all persons who could not present recent vaccination scars on their bodies, and to re-vaccinate all those who could not give assurance of having been vaccinated within a period of two years.

"Just before and during the prevalence of this epidemic I vaccinated nearly 3,000 victims, using the so-called "pure calf-lymph" obtained every third day 'fresh' from the vaccine farm of the New York City Board of Health. Much to the disgust of the people, and more my own surprise and chagrin, I was confronted with a large number of cases of vaccinal erysipelas, as well as several cases of phlegmonous axillary abscesses following as results of vaccination. This is not all; a number of those vaccinated were attacked with confluent smallpox at periods varying from twelve days to three weeks, after having been rendered ‘immune' (?) by vaccination.

"These astounding facts, so contrary to my preconceived notions about vaccination and smallpox, I could not account for and they confused me as I was not able to see where the 'protection' came in.

"With Pascal, I 'considered the affirmation of facts more powerful than assertions of men'. I then began a careful study of the relations existing between smallpox and vaccination, with the ultimate result that I was forced to entirely abandon all faith in the medical dogma of vaccinal protection against smallpox. During the epidemic, I had under my inspection 28 smallpox patients, all of whom, with one exception, had been 'successfully' vaccinated. Several of these patients had been re-vaccinated before contracting the disease. THUS I WAS FORCED, THROUGH THE STERN LOGIC OF DISAGREEABLE FACTS, TO THE UNWELCOME CONCLUSION THAT VACCINATON HAD NOT PROTECTED THESE VICTIMS OF SMALLPOX.

"After the revelations of this dismal experience had dawned upon me I determined to make a careful study of the printed data on vaccination. After a thorough investigation of the statistics of smallpox epidemiology collected ffrom various parts of the world, I was treated to another great surprise, namely, the world's greatest statisticians on smallpox and vaccination fully corroorated the experience that I had met with in the Lockport epidemic.

"Previous to this disappointing experience I had read only the usual literature on the subject, found in libraries and medical schools. I had heard only the "expert" (one-sided) testimony of the pro-vaccinists. I knew but one side of the question and was like the one of whom John Stuart Mill spoke, when he mid:

'HE WHO KNOWS ONLY HIS OWN SIDE OF THE CASE KNOWS LITTLE OF THAT.'

"After a careful study of the history of vaccination and the extensive experience in its use, I am thoroughly convinced that:

"(1) Vaccination is utterly useless as a preventive against smallpox, that millions of vaccinated persons have died of smallpox.
"(2) The practice of this degrading rite is enforced by doctors as a dogma without being understood; that like other infamous dogma it is good only for "fees"
"(3) Inoculation as unanimously believed in and practiced by the "regular" doctors for 100 years was guilty of multiplying smallpox....
"( 4) Smallpox epidemics were checked by cessation of inoculation and not by the introduction of vaccination.
"(5) Smallpox continued to increase under vaccination until sanitation and improved nutrition came into more general use.
"(6) Health measures have controlled smallpox, and vaccination has claimed the credit.
"(7) Vaccination protects from smallpox only when it kills the patient before smallpox develops.
"(8) Vaccination has been the means of disseminating (spreading) consumption, cancer, syphilis, and many other fatal and loathsome diseases.
"(9) Tuberculosis is a disease common to cattle and to human beings and has frequently been conveyed by vaccination from the former to the latter, by way of vaccination.
"(10) Edward Jenner shaddled a legacy of disease and death on the human race and incidentally made $150,000 by the transaction.
"(11) Many doctors and some editors are making money by propagating this curse. (vaccination)
"(12) Vaccination is called 'successful' when it succeeds in making healthy people diseased.
"(13) Disease as the result of vaccination is the logical harvest from the seed sown.
"(14) Vaccination has no scientific basis upon which to rest its claims and no analogy in any ascertained principle or law in nature.
"(15) The so called 'spontaneous cow-pox' (from which vaccine is made) is a myth; the disease so named, being tubercular or syphilitic in its nature.
"(16) When vaccination kills its victims the facts are suppressed and the death certificates name other diseases as the cause.
"(17) Compulsory vaccination has been abolished in England, Switzerland, and certain other countries, while laws sustaining this crime still disgrace the statute books of many states in free (?) America.
"(18) Vaccination is one of the foulest blots on the escutcheon of the ‘nobel art of healing' ".

CHAPTER 4
THE HISTORY OF VACCINATION

"A mere assumption of belief unsupported by demonstrable facts is always open to criticism. It is easy to be carried away by the beauty of an ideal or entranced by the overwhelming appeal of a pet delusion . . . . We hav, had much to learn but even more to unearn. Many think they are thinking constructively when they are merely rearranging their prejudices." —George S. Weger, M.D.

WHO STARTED VACCINATION AND WHY’

It has been claimed, by an unenlightened few, that vaccination is based on scientific principles and is of comparatively recent origin. But these claims have been proved false, first, because inoculation was practiced and abandoned as useless by primitive tribes many centuries ago, and second because Jenner and the modern experimenters in vaccination were not scientists and did not test and prove their theories by any scientific criteria before launching the hazarduous practice on the public.

For many years Edward Jenner was acclaimed a hero for what was thought to be his discovery of cow-pox vaccination. But this dubious honor was later admitted to belong to Benjamin Jesty, whom all the chroniclers name as the one responsible for the original discovery of cow-pox inoculation. Jesty, a farmer, Plett, a teacher and Jensen, a farmer, were named as ‘successful experimenters" in the field of cow-pox vaccination several years before Jenner’s first inoculation These and all subsequent vaccination experiments were then, and still are, haphazard and unscientific attempts at solving the problem of disease prevention.

Before we trace the ancient history of vaccination let us review some of the outstanding authorities who recognized that:

VACCINATION IS NOT SCIENTIFIC

Many of the world’s greatest thinkers, scientists, statesmen and even doctors have condemned vaccination as being a crime against humanity, a fraud promoted for private gain, an insult to the race and a blot upon the name of civilization Yet, this treacherous practice of blood pollution, which was cradled in the lap of. ignorant savage tribes, has been adopted by, supposedly, enlightened government of the present day and forced on the protesting population—for profit.

M.M. Gernerd in his book "The Vaccination Imposture" says:

"Vaccination is not in any sense scientific; doctors never know what the result will be in any case; they don’t absolutely know that it ever prevented smallpox; they never know when they have pure vaccine; the practice is born of pure superstition; and it has been a breeder of many kindred fallacies."

Florence Nightingale, the world’s most famous nurse and an authority on smallpox by right of extensive experience, said:

"Everyone who knows anything about public health questions will agree to the practical unity of epidemics, and the determining causes, and that exemption from. . . disease must be sought not by any one thing, such as vaccination, but by inquiring into and removing the causes of epidemic susceptibility generally."

Alfred Russell Wallace, in his famous book, "The Wonderful Century (p. 314) says:

"The successive Vaccination Acts were passed by means of allegations which were wholly untrue, and promises which have all been unfulfilled. They stand alone in modern legislation as a gross interference with personal liberty and the sanctity of the home; while as an attempt to cheat outraged nature, and to avoid a symotic disease without getting rid of the foul conditions that produce or propagate it, the practice of vaccination is utterly opposed to the whole teaching of sanitary science, and is one of those terrible blunders which, in their far-reaching evil consequences, are worse than the greatest of crimes."

Among our best authoritative sources of information are the actual government records showing the

INCREASED DEATH-RATE AFTER VACCINATION WAS ESTABLISHED

The report of Dr. William Farr, Compiler of Statistics of the Registrar-General, London. states:

"Smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced…..The mean annual (smallpox) mortality to 10,000 population from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of (only) 2.04, whereas (after compulsory vaccination) in 1871 the death rate was 10.24 and in 1872 the death rate was 8.33, and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by legislative enactments."

Other authorities and numerous records and case histories showing the failure of vaccination are given elsewhere in this book.

The truly great minds of the world recognize the balanced economy of nature and know that when the chemistry of the body is thrown out of balance by faulty nutrition and other causes, toxins accumulate and the entire physical organism marshals its healing forces in an effort to meet the emergency and make adjustment to the condition. This healing effort may be expressed in many ways, such as accelerated circulation and fever, disturbed breathing, intensified bowel elimination (diarrhea) and mucous discharges to expel poisons, eruptions, swelling of lymphatic glands such as the tonsils to handle the overload of toxic waste, pain, indicating the presence of irritants, etc. All this display of the vital energy at work to restore normalcy, is interpreted by the average physician, as disease and something to interfere with by giving poison drugs, vaccines and crippling operations. , Modern medical methods delay and frustrate the unexcelled healing efforts of nature.

Dr. Oliver Wendell Holmes, one of the few enlightened physicians expressed this point in one powerful sentence when he said:

"THE DISGRACE OF MEDICINE HAS BEEN THE COLOSSAL SYSTEM OF SELF-DECEPTION, IN OBEDIENCE TO WHIH MINES HAVE BEEN EMPTIED OF THEIR CANKERING MINERALS, THE ENTRAILS OF ANIMALS TAXED FOR THEIR IMPURITIES, THE POISON BAGS OF REPTILES DRAINED OF THEIR VENOM, AND ALL THE INCONCEIVABLE ABOMINATIONS THUS OBTAINED, THRUST DOWN THE THROATS OF HUMAN BEINGS SUFFERING (merely) FROM SOME WANT OF ORGANIZATION, NOURISHMENT, OR VITAL STIMULATION."

When we read of primitive witch doctors experimenting with inoculation by rubbing the pus from the diseased into scratches on the body of the well, we look upon it with tolerance because they did not have enough knowledge about physiology to understand that nature does not produce health by contaminating the blood stream with filth. Although we are willing to make excuses for the mental immaturity of those backward races, what excuse can be make for our modern doctors who do the same thing — on a larger scale — with a longer needle?

Vaccination has been a tragic failure because it is based on the false theory that disease is a ruthless enemy that must be fought and killed by poison drugs or outwitted by (supposedly) implanting anti-bodies from vaccines into the blood stream. These mythical anti-bodies are said to make war on disease germs. But germs are not the cause of disease in the first place and are useful wherever they are found in nature, whether they are serving as scavengers working on the decaying waste products, or whether they are helping with the decomposing and renewing of cell structure that takes place continually, they are inseparably a part of the great pattern of pulsating life. (For detailed, scientific experiments proving the importance and nature of germs, bacteria, microbes, etc., read the findings of Antoine Bechamp as recorded in the remarkable book, BECHAMP OR PASTEUR, by E. Douglas Hume — English Pub. see bibliography.)

As has been stated before, disease is a cleansing effort of the body in its attempt to rid itself of excess poisons, waste matter, obstructions, and incompatible food. DISEASE IS NOT SOMETHING TO BE CURED; IT IS A CURE.

Germs do not attack from without; they develop within the cells themselves when the need for them occurs. The whole framework of vaccination is based on the misconception that germs cause disease and must be counteracted with vaccines. But this procedure can bring no other result than harm.

TUBERCULOSIS CAUSED BY VACCINATION

Dr. Walter James, of Philadelphia said:

"VACCINATION DOES NOT STAY THE SPREAD OF DISEASE OR EVEN MODIFY IT in those cases who get it after vaccination. IT DOES INTRODUCE INTO THE SYSTEM TUBERCULOSIS, CANCER, AND LEPROSY. It does just what inoculation did — cause the spread of disease."

Annie Riley Hale, (researcher for Congressmen) stated:

"The Surgeon-General of the United States Army innocently recorded in the 1918-1919 report that ‘for all officers and enlisted men, Americans and native troops in all countries where U.S. troops were serving, tuberculosis of the lungs was the leading cause for discharge; and among American troops at home and abroad there were 31,106 hospital admissions for pulmonary tuberculosis with 1,114 deaths, in the period of this country’s participation in the First World War.’" (Medical Voodoo, p. 27)

No tubercular men were inducted into the Army. It was after the blood poisoning vaccinations at camp that diseases of every description developed. Then the men were invalided home by the thousands and dumped on society as physical and mental wrecks. Many of these men had never been in battle nor had even left American soil.

Dr. E. C. Rosenow, an experimentalist at the Mayo Clinic, recorded in the Mayo Collected Papers (Vol. II, p. 92) that he found "the vaccine serums injected into guinea pigs tended to localize in the lungs."

Edward Jenner inoculated his 18 months old son with swine-pox, on November 1791 and again in April, 1798 with cow-pox. The boy was never very well after that and died of tuberculosis at the age of 21.

In Baron’s Life of Jenner, (Vol. II, p. 304) we learn that, "On the 14th of May, 1796 . . . Jenner vaccinated James Phipps, a boy about eight years old, with the matter taken from the hand of a dairymaid infected with casual cow-pox.

After waiting six weeks Jenner inoculated this boy on both arms with smallpox matter, taken from the arm of a boy with smallpox. Several months later Phipps was again inoculated with the variolous matter (smallpox pus) but no effect was produced."

The inoculation didn’t "take" so on the strength of this one experiment and its questionable interpretation, Jenner based his claim that one vaccination would "forever secure a person from smallpox." No time had elapsed to prove whether it would last a lifetime or a month or at all; but without any proof or any scientific basis or evidence for its practice, the doctors and the government adopted it and made it compulsory, no doubt, seeing the gold mine in profits that it would yield.

James Phipps was declared immune to smallpox but be too, died of tuberculosis at the age of 20.

In Baron’s Life of Jenner, the author refers to Phipps condition as follows:

"While walking with a friend one day they passed young Phipps, when Jenner exclaimed, ‘Oh, there is poor Phipps; I wish you could see him; he has been very unwell lately and I am afraid he has got tuberculosis on his lungs. He was recently inoculated for smallpox, I believe for the 20th time, and all without effect.’"

 VACCINATION IS OF VERY ANCIENT ORIGIN

As was previously stated, neither Jenner, with all his fanfare and praise, nor the obscure Jesty, was the discoverer of inoculation. It was a "carry-over" from very ancient times when superstitious fear and guess-work dominated the healing field.

An idea of its ancient origin may be gathered from the "Lecture Memoranda,"XVII International Congress of Medicine, London, 1913, which states:

"The practice of inoculation for the prevention of disease is one of considerable antiquity. The period of its discovery can only be conjectured..."

"Dhanwantari, the Vedic Father of Medicine, and the earliest known Hindu physician, who lived about 1,500 B.C., is supposed to have been the first to practice inoculation for smallpox. It is even stated that the ancient Hindus employed a vaccine, which they prepared by the transmission of the smallpox virus through a cow." (History of Inoculation and Vaccination, pp. 6, 13)

This common practice of disease transmission of both ancient and modern tunes, undoubtedly, has a strong relationship to the plagues and epidemics that sweep those countries where vaccination is still practiced.

If this method of disease prevention had ever been successful, smallpox would have been eliminated from the world centuries ago, but smallpox persists in localities where vaccination is compulsory and declines where it is abandoned in favor of sanitation and hygienic measures.

The practice of inoculation spread like a noxious weed, from the savage tribes of the forgotten past into the civilizations of Africa, Arabia, Tibet, India and finally into Europe and America.

Dr. Clements in his pamphlet, "A Superstitious Custom" traces the inoculation practices through the various modern countries previous to Jenner’s day. He writes:

"In 1673 inoculation against smallpox appeared in Denmark; and in 1778, on recommendation of the medical fraternity, two inoculation houses were established by the king in the capitol.

"In Italy, inoculation was secretly practiced by the Neapolitans from early times. It was freely performed by nurses, who inoculated infants, entrusted to their care, without the knowledge of the parents.

"In 1722, Dr. Wright, a surgeon of Wales refers to inoculation against smallpox in the British Isles as ‘a very ancient custom.’ (Jenner didn’t begin his vaccinations until 1796). One William Allen, then 99 years old, said inoculation had been known and used during his entire lifetime, and he well remembered his mother stating that it had been commonly done all her life, and that she got smallpox that way.

"The first record of inoculation in France appears in 1712, and in 1763 a fatal epidemic of smallpox occurred in that country that wiped out a large part of the population; it was attributed to inoculation and for a time the Government prohibited the practice. Five years later, on the insistence of the medical faculties, this decree was rescinded and by the latter part of the 18th century inoculation was again commonly practiced in that country.

"The first record of inoculation in Ireland appears in 1723, when a medical doctor in Dublin inoculated 25 persons. Three of these died as a result, and the custom was abandoned for some time.

‘Inoculation appears to have been first introduced in Germany in 1724. It soon fell into disfavor, however, because of the many deaths in Berlin from smallpox, as a result of it. After many years of diligent medical propagandizing, the doctors were able to get the people to accept it again.

"In 1754, Peverani introduced inoculation for smallpox into Rome, but smallpox soon began to spread and opposition rose to such a pitch that the practice was discontinued, until the medical profession, after years of labor, persuaded the people to again submit to it.

"One hundred forty-two years later, Carlo Ruta, Professor of Materia Medica at the University of Perugia, Italy, protested against the deadly custom in these scathing words:

"Vaccination is a monstrosity, a misbegotten offspring of error and ignorance; and, being such, it should have no place in either hygiene or medicine....Believe not in vaccination, it is a world-wide delusion, an unscientific practice, a fatal superstition with consequences measured today by tears and sorrow without end.’

"In Ancient Greece and Rome, the MIGHTY NATIONS OF MIGHTY MEN, there was no inoculation — no vaccination — and no smallpox." These nations have been known down through history as being famous for their general habits of health, cleanliness and stability as well as their vigor and strength. Among the Greeks and Romans smallpox was unknown until it was carried there by the inoculators from other countries.

INOCULATION IN AMERICA

In America, inoculation for smallpox appears to have been first introduced in 1721 by Cotton Mather, a clergyman. His method was that of taking a toothpick and dipping it into the pus from a pustule of a smallpox patient and smearing it into a scratch on the arm of a well person. He inoculated 224 persons during the first six months of his experimentation. Six of them died from poisoning, six had no apparent reaction at the time and the rest suffered reactions of varying intensity.

"He was bitterly attacked for recommending such a practice," says Dr. Clements, "and for a time his life was in danger. This incident encited strong opposition to inoculation, in this country . . . A public meeting was called in Boston where the practice was deprecated as causing the death of many persons.

"It was contended that the operation was likely to prove most dangerous to those submitting to it. In the meeting the following resolution was agreed upon and published by the public authorities:

"A resolve upon a debate by the people of Boston concerning inoculation of smallpox, on the 21st day of July, 1721.

"It appears by numerous instances that it has proven the death of many persons even after the operation, and brought distemper upon many others which have in the end proven fatal to them; that the natural tendency of infusing such malignant filth in the blood is to corrupt and putrefy it, and if there be not a sufficient discharge of that malignity by the place of inoculation or elsewhere, it lays the foundation for many dangerous diseases; that the operation tends to spread and continue the infection in a place longer than otherwise might be (as in the case of smallpox); that the continuance of the operation among us is likely to prove of the most dangerous consequences.
        "By the Select Men of the Town of Boston, July 22, 1721"

We observe, here, that the Founding Fathers of this country were intelligent men who were vitally concerned with the health and welfare of the people whom they governed. Although this was years before our revolution, these same men, no doubt, played a part in shaping the destiny of this country. This was also before the medical association got its strangle hold on the health of our people and prostituted the art of healing to the business of making money without giving "full value received". Those leaders with ideals and high purposes were not able to hold the gilted-edge vaccination monster at bay very long. The high pressure "tactics" of the serum promoters finally corrupted the minds of the people and they were induced to submit to full scale vaccination in many states. America, today, is unfortunately, one of the most lucrative fields for medical exploitation.

Our Constitution promises the people freedom but the enslavement of compulsory vaccination hounds the employees and personnel of our tax supported institutions such as Civil Service, county and state hospitals and institutions, state colleges, military service, many public schools and some entire states. There is absolutely no proof of benefits from vaccination and no sound basis for its compul

sion but it is forced into operation from year to year and the outraged taxpayers are forced to pay for it.

The useless and hazardous but inflexible law that requires vaccination in order

to travel abroad brands U. S. as backward and unscientific. Other countries have learned the fallacy of vaccination and discarded it as worthless and deadly.

"Medical schools claim that the theory of inoculation is based on scientific facts but history proves that this claim is false. What are these so-called, scientific facts? Where are they (if any)? Medical history discusses many theories and hypotheses, but it describes no scientific facts. It is a gross misrepresentation to hold that the superstitious practice of barbarians ‘is based on discoveries made in the fundamental sciences,’ or on scientific facts." — Clements.

The testament from medical history itself proves that smallpox increased tremendously after the enforcement of vaccination and at the present time there are far more deaths and diseases from vaccination itself than from the diseases the vaccinations are supposed to prevent. Figures and case histories to support this statement are given elsewhere in this book and in many other books on vaccination.

VACCINATION BASED ON DAIRYMAID’S STORY — NOT SCIENTIFIC.

Lady Mary Wortly Montague was said to have been the one who introduced inoculation into England in 1717 after she returned from the Orient (in Turkey, where her husband was an ambassador). Inoculation was in its popular experimental stage there at that time. The custom had probably been taken by the Arabs into Africa, notably, those countries near the Red Sea. From there it may have been taken into Europe by way of the Bosphorus. When Lady Montague spoke of this practice of arm-to-arm inoculation to Jenner he said:

"Ay, but the Glouchestershire dairymaids have a better trick than that. They say that if a person takes the cowpox from the cow, he will never after have smallpox. Now cowpox is smallpox of the cow. Cowpox is not infectious; a person once having cowpox will never have smallpox afterwards, and there are no dangerous results to be anticipated, as there are with (arm-to-arm) inoculations."

All these claims have been refuted by scientific findings, but as Jenner was not a scientist he was satisfied to accept the opinions and superstitions of unlearned dairymaids. Science has later presented sound proof that cowpox is not the same as smallpox and does not protect from smallpox or even from cowpox.

VACCINATION DOES NOT IMMUNIZE, SAY AUTHORITIES

Space will not permit the quoting of all the qualified authorities who brought forth evidence that cowpox has no relation to smallpox and cannot immunize against it. A few will show the trend in this direction.

Joseph Swan, in his comprehensive work, "THE VACCINATION PROBLEM" (pp. 87 — 102) gives the results of government surveys and reports of doctors and scientists who investigated this matter. He reports Sir Thomas Watson (the distinguished surgeon and a believer in vaccination) who said:

"A little consideration will suffice to show that the vaccine disease is suigeneris. In no sense does it own its origin to smallpox. There is no such relation between the two. . . The true attitude of cowpox towards smallpox is an attitude of antagonism." (British Medical Journal, Jan. 17, 1880)

The renowned bacteriologist, E. M. Crookshank stated:

"COWPOX HAS NEVER BEEN CONVERTED INTO HUMAN SMALLPOX, AND IN THEIR CLINICAL HISTORY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY, NATURAL COWPOX AND HUMAN SMALLPOX ARE SO DIFFERENT, THAT THE COMPARATIVE PATHOLOGISI’IS NO MORE PREPARED TO ADMIT THEIR IDENTITY THAN HE IS PREPARED TO ADMIT THE IDENTITY OF COWPOX AND SHEEP-POX OR SMALLPOX AND THE PLAGUE." (p. 328, Bacteriology and Infectious Diseases, Fourth Edition, by Crookshank)

Dr. (later Sir) William Osler, one of the most highly respected medical authorities, although an advocate of vaccination was forced, by factual evidence to admit the dangers attending this practice. He did not endorse Jenner’s exaggerated promises of lifetime immunity without danger. In his "Principles and Practice of Medicine", p. 330, 8th Edition, he wrote:

"With the greatest care (in vaccinating) certain risks are present . . . A quiescent malady may be lighted into activity by vaccination. This has happened with congenital syphilis, also with tuberculosis." (emphasis supplied)

WHAT HAPPENED TO JENNER’S LIFETIME IMMUNITY?

When Jenner promised the world that his cowpox vaccinations would give lifetime immunity "with no dangerous results" as with the usual inoculations, he admitted that inoculation had always been accompanied with danger that all recognized. It was not long, however, before Jenner’s cowpox vaccinations were followed by death and disease and that practice was also branded as dangerous and deadly.

Regarding the increased death-rate due to vaccination, Herbert Spencer states in his Facts and Comments:

"Jenner and his disciples have assumed that when the vaccine has passed through the patient’s system he is safe against smallpox, and there the matter ends . . . I propose to show that there the matter does not end. The interference with the order of Nature has various sequences other than those counted upon. Some have been made known.

"A Parliamentary Return issued in 1880 (No. 392) shows. . . that there was a decrease of 6,600 (per million births) in the deaths of infants from all causes; while the deaths caused by eight specified diseases, either directly communicable or exacerbated by the effects of vaccination, increased from 20,524 to 41,353 per million births per annum — more than double. It is clear that far more were killed by these other diseases than were saved from smallpox."

Vaccination was made compulsory in England in 1853. Judging by the data from the above quoted Parliamentary Return, it would appear that after 27 years of enforced vaccination, the death rate increased only among the vaccinated diseases. The decline in deaths from other causes was, no doubt, brought about by the improvement in sanitation and nutrition that came into prominence about that time. It was around 1840 that Sylvester Graham, Dr. Trall and other pioneers of the new health movement emphasized the importance of correct nutrition and through this teaching they helped raise the health standards that saved many lives. If vaccination had not been persisted in, the great improvements in sanitation and nutrition would have had a better chance to eliminate disease. But as it is, we now have a greater scourge of killer diseases than at any other time in recorded history; and much of it is traceable to vaccination.

JENNER’S ATTITUDE TOWARD COMPLAINTS AND DISASTER OF VACCINATION

Dr. W. R. Hadwin who had considerable experience with smallpox patients in the hospitals of England and had seen the tragic results of vaccination, gave lecture in Liverpool where he discussed the typical excuses and evasions made by Jenner regarding the complaints and failures of his vaccinations. Excerpts from this lecture are as follows:

"Now, after Jenner had written a paper on this wonderful legend of the dairymaids, there came forward on every hand no end of cow-doctors who had a large experience in the matter, and had literally flooded him with evidence of people who had had cowpox vaccinations and later contracted smallpox.

"Here was proof that he could not ignore . . . But Jenner was one of the most resourceful men in excuse making that ever lived; let anyone read his and there will be no difficulty in coming to that conclusion.

"‘Ay’, said Jenner, ‘There are two kinds of smallpox; there is a genuine kind and a spurious kind, (laughter from the audience) and those who have been vaccinated and had smallpox afterwards, they have been vaccinated with spurious cowpox, but those who have been vaccinated and have not had smallpox afterwards, they have been inoculated with the genuine variety.’" (laughter)

Jenner had no answer when asked how to tell the difference between spurious and genuine cowpox. Neither he nor anyone else was able to find a safe vaccine, yet the vaccinations were continued without interruption with the same questionable vaccines that had no proof of purity or assurance of safety. The people reminded Jenner that a person is just as dead whether he died of spurious or genuine smallpox and it was little comfort to know that he and the government approved of the vaccine used.

When Jenner was confronted with the evidence that a group of people had been vaccinated with the same batch of vaccine but some had developed smallpox and others did not, he told them that those who were unfortunate enough to get smallpox must have been vaccinated too soon or too late after exposure to smallpox. But he never was able to determine just when was the right time to vaccinate. As many of the casualties were among his own patients it was clear that the whole procedure was operated on a basis of guesswork.

ENGLISH GOVERNMENT SUPPORTED JENNER IN HIS VENTURE

In spite of the obvious failure of vaccination, Jenner applied to the English Government for money to promote his scheme. It was on the strength of the dairymaid’s story and his groundless promise of lifetime immunity, and his unscientific experiment on James Phipps that Parliament gave him 10 000 in 1802. Either Jenner had an unusual gift of persuasion or the English government was a victim of "wishful thinking" for in 1807 Jenner talked them out another 20,000 pounds which amounted to 30,000 pounds in all, ($150,000) public funds with which to propagate his vaccination diseases and death throughout the world.

When Jenner made the statement that one vaccination would give lifelong protection against smallpox he seemed to expect that people would regard him as some great Oracle whose words would never be questioned. Even after deaths had occurred from vaccination he brazenly submitted a manuscript to the Royal College of Surgeons entitled, "An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of Variolae Vaccine" in which he again stated his theory, " . . . What renders the cowpox virus so extremely singular is, that the person who has been thus affected is forever after secure from the infusion of smallpox; neither exposure to the various effluvia nor the insertion of the matter into the skin producing the malady."

The complaints continued to pour in but Jenner ignored the facts and like one possessed by an obsession he wrote in his third publication an answer to the objectors as follows: "Some there are who suppose the security (Immunity) obtained through the cowpox will be of temporary nature only. This supposition is refuted, not only by analogy with respect to the habits of disease of a similar kind, but by incontrovertible facts, which appear again its. . ." (Baron 1, p. 490)

Where (we ask) are these incontrovertible facts? No one has seen them and Jenner never did bring them forth. But Jenner and a certain class of doctors had discovered that vaccination could be a paying business even if they couldn’t make it work; so from then on, the colossal advertising program was set up to propagandize the population into believing in vaccination.

Lord Lyttleton must have had a stake in this multi-million dollar enterprise when he stated in the House of Lords: "It is unnecessary to speak of the certainty of vaccination as a preventive of smallpox, that being a point on which the whole medical profession has arrived at complete unanimity."

This statement was not quite true because all the enlightened doctors, (of which there were not a great many) condemned vaccination. But the words of Lyttleton had their desired effect on the people and that was the purpose of the speech. Everything possible was done to suppress the facts that revealed the dismal failure of vaccination.

According to Thomas Morgan in his Medical Delusions (p. 48-49) "Jenner soon discovered that vaccination did not give immunity from smallpox, including some who had been vaccinated by himself and had died from it. Not wishing to bring vaccination into disrepute, he endeavored to suppress reports, and in writing to a friend, said, ‘I wish my professional brethren to be slow to publish fatal results after vaccination.’ and in 1810 he wrote: ‘When I found Dr. Woodworth about to publish his pamphlet relative to the eruption (smallpox) cases at the Smallpox Hospital, I entreated him in the strongest terms, both by letter and conversation, not to do a thing that would so disturb the progress of vaccination.’ (Barron’s Life of Jenner)

"The foregoing plainly proves that Jenner himself was aware of the utter uselessness of vaccination; but, having received the bounty from the government he preferred to resort to all kinds of schemes rather than acknowledge its failure.

"From its inception until the present day, the vaccination scheme has been an endless record of lies, deception, fraud, juggling statistics, and falsifying death certificates in order to preserve vaccination from reproach and to secure its continuation. . . and all this after more than a century of terrible experience, which has demonstrated that vaccination has killed more than smallpox, besides crippling and disfiguring millions more."

EVEN JENNER RECOGNIZED THE FAILURE OF VACCINATION -.

In his work on The Value of Vaccination (pp. 68-69) Dr. William Winterburn says that even "The Royal Jennerian Society" (under Jenner’s direction) in its second report in 1806, "Admitted having seen a few cases of smallpox in persons who had passed through the cowpox in the usual way." He says further:

"In the same year the Royal College of Surgeons issued a circular letter to 1,000 of its members asking their experience with vaccination. They received 426 answers, with the information of 56 cases of smallpox in the vaccinated, 66 cases of eruption and 24 bad arms."

The London MEDICAL OBSERVER, (VoL VI, 1810) published particulars of "535 CASES OF SMALLPOX AFTER VACCINATION — the operation having been performed in some of them by Jenner himself — including their names and the authorities reporting them; and similar details of 97 FATAL CASES OF SMALLPOX IN THE VACCINATED, with 150 cases of serious injury arising from vaccination among whom were 10 medical men — with their names and addresses — including two professors of anatomy, who had suffered from the operation in their own families." (Medical Voodoo — Hale p. 85)

Winterburn gives additional proof of the failure of vaccination to protect from smallpox, in a report of a "Severe epidemic in Marseilles when 2,000 vaccinated persons were stricken with smallpox; and the epidemic of 1831 in Wurttemberg when 995 ‘protected’ ones succumbed to the prevailing malady."

When Jenner was faced with the disturbing fact that vaccination with cowpox was as much a failure as the previous inoculations with human smallpox, he invented all manner of excuses which were as unconvincing as they were useless. His one—track mind seemed to admit no other thought except pus. So when cow or human putrescence didn’t prevent smallpox he continued to experiment with other varieties. He noticed that in the suppurating cracks in the feet of diseased horses there was a putrid mass of pus. This disease was called "horse grease" by some people but was considered, by some veterinarians, to be a form of syphilis of the horse. Others said it was a type of consumption or wasting disease. For some unaccountable reason, Jenner thought this pus would be a good addition to his discredited vaccines so he injected it into a cow and produced a disease in the cow. With the concoction of pus from the diseased horse and cow he made a serum. When the people learned what he had done they protested so violently that Dr. Pearson wrote to Jenner immediately and said, "For God’s sake take the horse out, or you will damn the whole business."

Following that incident Jenner wrote to a friend and said, "I am on the look-out to be able to make a fortune; and to appease the public." Then, as Dr. Hadwin related in his famous lecture, "Jenner decided to take the horse out. But he was still faced with the problem of finding genuine cowpox. This he was never able to do. . …In sheer desperation, he fell back upon spontaneous cowpox although he had declared previously, it was absolutely useless in preventing smallpox. And it is this spontaneous cowpox vaccine, this which was denounced by Edward Jenner, this which was scouted by the so-called inventor himself as absolutely useless in protecting against smallpox; this is the stuff that is being used today under the name of ‘pure calf lymph smallpox vaccine’ and before which the medical profession is bowing, while professing to follow in the footsteps of Jenner.

"There is not one medical man in 10,000 who has ever seen cowpox in a cow . . - and very few who have seen a case of smallpox so they really know very little about it. There are two things the medical profession should learn: The first is to know smallpox when they see it; and the next Is, to know how to treat it when they do see it." (The Vaccination Delusion, by W. R. Hadwin, M.D.)

RE-VACCINATION DESTROYS PROMISED IMMUNITY

"We will suppose" said Dr. Hadwin, "for the sake of argument, that cowpox is smallpox (as some doctors still claim) and that when you give a person cowpox -----that is when you vaccinate him — you give him a mild (or severe) sort of smallpox. Jenner himself, said, ‘Cowpox does not prevent smallpox; it is smallpox.’ So that, according to that theory, you are literally "smallpoxing" a person when you vaccinate him.. . Jenner said, ‘A person once vaccinated is forever after secure from smallpox’ and that, ‘re-vaccination would rob his discovery of half its virtues.’ But what is the medical propaganda telling you? The doctors know that vaccination will not protect you against another vaccination. If one cowpox inoculation will not protect you from being cow-poxed again, how on earth is it going to protect you from being smallpoxed? Why, the very theory of re-vaccination is condemnatory of the whole creed. If it cannot protect against a mild form in vaccination how can it protect one from a serious form of smallpox? The most amazing thing on earth is the fact that the medical men cannot see this." (The Vaccination Delusion — Dr. Hadwin)

JENNER FANS RESENT THE TRUTH

The Editor of "TRUTH" (London) answers a complaint in an editorial of his publication as follows:

"In his article, ‘The Fraud of Vaccination,’ published last week in "TRUTH, Dr. Hadwin made some remarks not altogether complimentary to Jenner, the (self proclaimed) discoverer of vaccination. These remarks led one reader to denounce both Dr. Hadwin and myself — Dr. Hadwin for libeling one of the greatest benefactors of humanity (she thinks) and myself for propagating the libel. Dr. Hadwin is well able to take care of himself. For my own part, not wishing to do any injustice to the name and fame of the late Dr. Jenner, I asked Dr. Hadwin what he had against him and he replied by sending me a pamphlet he had written on the subject. This I have compared with the account of Jenner’s life given in the "Dictionary of National Biography," and the result is so illuminating that I will now give the salient facts as briefly as possible.

"To begin with, it is clear that Jenner never possessed anything that would be recognized today as a medical qualification. At the age of 16 he was apprenticed to a country doctor and apothecary and at 21 he was sent for two years as a pupil to Dr. John Hunter of London. At 23 Jenner returned to his native village and started to practice as a surgeon and apothecary. He continued for several years as just a plain, unqualified country doctor. At the end of this time be made his first bid for fame. In l787 he sent a paper on "The Natural History of the Cuckoo" to the Royal Society, and as a result, with Hunter’s influence he was elected F.R.C. Three years later he applied to St. Andrew’s University for an M.D. degree, and as St. Andrew’s, in those days, was not squeamish about degrees so long as the fees were forthcoming, Jenner became Doctor Jenner for the modest sum of 15 pounds. (about $75.00 in those days)

"As for the vaccination discovery it appears to have been founded upon what Dr. Hadwin calls a superstition among the dairymaids" (The editorial continues with the history of vaccination as already covered in this chapter so I do not think it is necessary to repeat it He concludes his article with this paragraph:)

‘What strikes me as remarkable about the whole affair is the ease with which Jenner got his theory accepted . . . It is true that medical research in the 19th century was not what it is today, but even then the picture of the whole of the College of Physicians and Surgeons swallowing the theory of an unqualified country apothecary, based on one totally unreliable experiment, seems scarcely credible…..I should imagine that he was one of those unscientific researchers who are always on the lookout for facts to fit their theories, instead of first making of their facts"

Dr. J. W. Hodge, of New York, had extensive experience with smallpox epidemics and vaccination epidemics also. Out of his wealth of knowledge on this subject he wrote on all its phases. In a published article dealing with "Some of the False Claims, Erroneous Deductions and Self Contradictions of the of the Vaccination Dogma" he stated:

"At first it was confidently asserted that vaccination would exterminate small-pox. That claim has been abandoned by Jenner’s most enthusiastic followers and the claim that re-vaccination will exterminate smallpox, was set up in its stead. The proof that the theory and the practice espoused by Jenner have been everywhere abandoned is found in the fact that all vaccinists now admit the necessity of re-vaccination, but do not agree on the period that may be allowed between successive repetitions of the ‘protective’ (?) rite.

"If you ask how often it must be repeated, you will be confronted with a babel of discordant replies You can choose any answer you please from ‘once only’ of the original Jenner up to an indefinite repetition, ‘until it no longer takes’, as now prescribed by the Chicago ‘Vaccination Creed’"

This "Vaccination Creed" formulated by the Chicago Health Department in 1902 stated "True vaccination repeated until it no longer "takes" always prevents smallpox. Nothing else does."

Regarding this fantastic assertion, Dr. Hodge has this to say:

"The above dogmatic deliverance aptly illustrates the recklessness of the disciples of Jenner in making bold asseverations in favor of vaccination which scorn the slightest attempt at verification."

The frequent and variegated vaccinations given to our service men give us a full-scale picture of what "repeated vaccination until it no longer takes" will do to the body and brain. Thousands of our healthiest men at the prime of life were rendered insane and millions of others were infected with disease of every description including the very ones they were "protected" against. A typical example is that of our Philippine soldiers. According to our military records: "Every enlisting soldier is subjected to vaccination at the time of being recruited, and revaccinated, not only on entering the U S Army, but also as often after that as seems advisable by the Army medical authorities " Chief Surgeon of the U. S. Philippine Army, said in his report, regarding the high incidence of smallpox among his vaccinated men "I can say that no Army was ever more thoroughly looked after in the matter of vaccination than ours. AND RE-VACCINATION MANY TIMES REPEATED WENT AS REGULARLY AS THE DRILLS AT A REGULAR POST." (emphasis supplied)

Yet, the records show a steady increase of smallpox among these men:

In 1888 — there were 76 cases of smallpox and 21 deaths from this cause.
In 1890 — there were 207 cases of smallpox and 78 deaths from this cause.
In 1900— there were 246 cases of smallpox and 113 deaths from this cause.

246 cases of smallpox and 113 deaths among the thoroughly and frequently vaccinated men would hardly bear out the claim of the Chicage Creed, that says:

"repeated re-vaccination always prevents smallpox and nothing else does."

Jenner and his followers had committed themselves to the view that Vaccination gave life-long immunity to smallpox. Therefore, they asserted that re-vaccination was not merely unnecessary, but impossible."

Dr. Pearson, one of Jenner’s strongest supporters said, "If a child can be reaccinated, then it can take smallpox; therefore, vaccination is not an equivalent for smallpox and where, then, is the good of it?" (Medical Gazette, 1831)

Dr. Pearson also stated, "It has been found that a person whose constitution has distinctly undergone the vaccine disease is in the future, unsusceptible of that same disease." (I wonder where he found that remarkable person.)

Here is an authority on the Jenner theory who promises that if the vaccination "takes" then a person cannot ever have another vaccination that will "take". This fortunate person is then supposed to be immune to both smallpox and vaccination reactions (vaccina).

The cases of smallpox and vaccination diseases and deaths continued to increase in large numbers among Jenner’s prize patients so he and his supporters had to retreat behind a bulwark of excuses. As usual, these failed to shield them from the rise of public indignation, so Jenner had to discard the impossible claim of life-time immunity in order to hold onto the vaccination fantasy at all.

Although they had previously taught that re-vaccination would cancel any hope of protection from vaccination, they nevertheless, changed their policy and advocated re-vaccination. They had learned, undeniably, that vaccination would not work and were to learn later that re-vaccination was even more disastrous but it was continued in spite of this.

In 1860 the Encyclopedia Britannica (Eighth Edition) stated:

"Nothing is more likely to prove hurtful to the cause of vaccination and render the public careless of securing to themselves its benefits, than the belief that they would require to submit to re-vaccination every 10 to 15 years."

Years later, the Eleventh Edition of the Encyclopedia shows the change of policy when it states:

"It is desirable that the operation (vaccination) should be repeated at the age of from 7 to 10 years, and thereafter, if it be possible, at intervals during life." (The more often the vaccinations, the greater the revenue to the doctors and vaccine promoters. This is the prime consideration in this business.)

RECORDS SHOW RE-VACCINATION FAILS

Since numerous examples of the failure of re-vaccination are given throughout this book, only a few will be mentioned in this chapter to show its position in the history of vaccination.

Dr. Sobatta, of the German Army gave a report of 154 soldiers who had been vaccinated four times with a lapse of a year and a half between shots. 146 of these cases had reactions of vaccina, indicating that the vaccinations and revaccinations did not protect for even one and one-half years.

Some startling results of re-vaccination experiments were published by the German Vaccination Commission in 1884. The experiments were made on 30 boys ranging in age from 8 to 14 years. Five of them had had smallpox within the previous two years; four of them had been vaccinated. The vaccinations were repeated every eight days with the following results:

The report stated that the 7 boys on the top row (including the 4 who had had smallpox) had reactions of vaccina indicating that neither smallpox nor revaccination had protected them for even three weeks. The 9 boys on the second row who had reactions showed that 67 per cent of the group did not have immunity that lasted even 8 days. Then the 7 boys on the top row who had been re-vaccinated were re-vaccinated again and 6 of them "took" which showed that 86 per cent of the group did not receive the promised immunity for as long as one week. The other boy in that group of 7 was reported as unsuccessful because he had developed dysentery during that week. This is an interesting point because it bears out the contention that when poisons are introduced into the body the healing mechanism attempts to expel them by way of diarrhea, mucous discharge, eruptions, etc. The diarrhea was, no doubt, one of the reactions of vaccina which would indicate that his vaccination also "took", making re-vaccination a 100 per cent failure in that group.

This is concrete proof that vaccination or re-vaccination does not protect against itself, or against smallpox and has no constructive quality to recommend it.

One of the favorite arguments of the exponents of re-vaccination is the claim that the re-vaccinated nurses in smallpox hospitals do not get smallpox. It would be more accurate to say that the records of the casualties of these re-vaccinated nurses are not made public. We read in the chapter on Falsified Death Certificates (Book II) that it is an accepted custom among doctors, to withhold from the death certificate the real cause of death when nurses (and sometimes when patients) die of smallpox after vaccination; some other causes are given. However, occasionally the private records are seen and it is then found that the vaccinated and re-vaccinated personnel show a higher incidence of smallpox and other diseases than do the unvaccinated laymen.

Many records and testimonies were brought forth when the Royal Vaccination Commission was making its investigation of this re-vaccination question. W. J. Collins, M.D. and J. A. Piecton, two of these Commissioners, after weighing the evidence of hundreds of witnesses who had testified before the Royal Commission, recorded their joint conclusions on this matter in the minority report (p. 61, par. 152) as follows:

"When we consider the large number of attacks and deaths by smallpox which have occurred among our thoroughly re-vaccinated army . . . as well as the number and fatality of re-vaccinated persons attacked by smallpox in London and at Warrington and Dewsbury, we are forced to the conclusion that the remarkable immunity recorded in the cases of nurses in smallpox hospitals cannot be accounted for by the fact that they have been re-vaccinated.

"In the hospital at Bicetre during the siege of Paris, in the midst of a larger accumulation of smallpox patients than has ever been known before or since, the immunity of those attendants and doctors who neglected re-vaccination was even more marked than in the case of the orderlies who were nearly all re-vaccinated. We attach considerable importance to the narrative given by M. Colin, Chief Medical Officer to the Bicetre Hospital during the siege.

"The point of this narrative is that while 15 of the re-vaccinated or well protected orderlies took the disease (smallpox), not one of the 80 who composed the medical and nursing staff, so many of whom had neglected re-vaccination, was attacked.

"It is sufficiently clear," declared the Royal Vaccination Commissioners, "that M. Cohn, though an impassioned advocate of vaccination, was so struck with the complete immunity of the medical and nursing staff, who by their neglect of re-vaccination appeared to offer less guarantee of protection than the orderlies, nearly all of whom had been re-vaccinated under his own eyes, that he thought it necessary to attempt some explanation." (THE VACCINATION PROBLEM, by Swan, p. 8)

Japan is one of the most glaring examples of the failure of vaccination and re-vaccination. Dr. Ruta, in his review of world statistics on smallpox reported:

"Between 1886 and 1892, there were 25,474,370 vaccinations and re-vaccinations performed in Japan, which meant that about two-thirds of the entire Japanese population, already vaccinated by the law of 1872, were re-vaccinated. During that 7-year period (1886-1892) of thorough re-vaccination, there were reported 165,774 cases of smallpox with 28,979 deaths."

When our U. S. Army of occupation moved into Japan after World War II, we could have been the means of liberating these needy people from this curse of medical ignorance, but instead, our medical, drug and chemical companies moved in also with their program of exploitation, and as a result, under the MacArthur regime, "The people were given the largest immunization and vaccination treatment in history. Every Japanese, received two smallpox shots making a total of 160 million vaccinations." (LIFE — Aug. 22, 1955)

CHAPTER V
CANCER CAUSED BY VACCINATION

"The chief, if not the sole cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination."—Dr. Robert Bell, the famous cancer specialist of the British Cancer Hospital.

We do not claim that vaccination is the only cause of cancer although Dr. Bell (quoted above) observed so many cases of cancers at the site of the vaccination and elsewhere, but directly traced to this cause that he affirmed that vaccination was the cause of the great increase in the cancer rate.

Dr Bell is just one of the many authorities who have been faced with the uncomfortable realization that the blood contamination from vaccines is one of the leading causes of cancer.

Dr. E. J. Post, a prominent physician of Berlmont, Michigan, said:

"I HAVE REMOVED CANCERS FROM VACCINATED ARMS EXACTLY WHERE THE POISON WAS INJECTED."

In the New York Press, January 26, 1909, W. B. Clark stated:

"Cancer was practically unknown until cowpox vaccination began to be introduced. I have had to do with 200 cases of cancer and I NEVER SAW A CASE OF CANCER IN AN UNVACCINATED PERSON."

Dr. Herbert Snow, Surgeon of the London Cancer Hospital, had this to say:

"I am convinced that some 80 per cent of these cancer deaths are caused by the inoculations or vaccinations they have undergone. These are well-known to cause grave and permanent disease of the heart also."

Dr. Dennis Turnbull, who had studied cancer for 30 years declared:

"I have no hesitation in stating that in my judgement the most frequent disposing condition for cancerous development is infused into the blood by vaccination and re-vaccination."

Dr. Forbes Laurie, late Medical Director of the Metropolitan Cancer Hospital, (London) said:

"I am thoroughly convinced that the increase of cancer is due to vaccination."

In his book CANCER AND VACCINATION, Esculapius says:

"No candid and scientific inquirer who has read the works of such authorities as Doctors Creighton, Crookshank and Scott Tebb, can be surprised that an alarming increase in cancer is now evident. Those who adopt the brutal practice of calf-lymph vaccination are but too surely sowing the wind which they must inevitably reap as the whirlwind, a whirlwind of corruption, disease and national deterioration. Where the so-called, human lymph is employed, syphilis, leprosy and tuberculosis follow in its train; and wherever calf-lymph is used, tuberculosis and cancer spread like a conflagration.

Sir Thomas Paget (M.D.), tells us that "the progress of vaccine infection in the blood shows us that a permanent morbid condition is established; in the tissues themselves, it is also established by this specific poison."

Dr. Benchetrit states that serums and vaccines "are principally responsible for the increase of those two really dangerous diseases, cancer and heart disease."

Dr. F. P. Millard, prominent Osteopath of Toronto and President of the National League for Prevention of Spinal Curvature says: "Abolish vaccination, and you will cut the cancer death-rate in half."

PHOTOGRAPHS OF FATAL CANCER CASES CAUSED BY VACCINATION

Although there have been thousands of cancers caused by vaccination space will not permit the reviewing of the case histories or even a small fraction of them. The photographs below will give an idea of the tragic condition and intense suffering brought about by this curse of the modern age — vaccination.

Mrs Helen Goates of Bolivar, Missouri was a strong, healthy woman with no skin trouble or chronic disease when she was persuaded, during a vaccination drive, to submit to vaccination. Almost immediately, after the injection, an inflamed swelling started to develop around the vaccination. It continued to increase in size and intensity until it covered her entire arm and hand. After a period of time it spread over her back and breast as is shown in the photograph. She was treated by more than a dozen doctors and cancer specialists but the condition grew steadily worse until death relieved her of her agony. Before her death she requested that a photograph be taken of the cancer in order that others might see the results of vaccination and be warned, in time against this ever present danger of vaccine poisoning. The cancer does not always start immediately. It usually takes months or years for the poisons to degenerate enough tissue for a cancer to form.

Photograph by permission of Harbison Printers, Oceano, Calif.

It is for this reason that most doctors fail to recognize the connection between the vaccinations and the cancers. The following photograph is an example of a later development. Benjamin F. Olevine of Altoona, Pennsylvania, was vaccinated when in good health. Two months later a sarcomatous (tumorous) growth began to develop where the vaccination sore had not healed. The growth reached enormous proportions, as may be seen from the photograph, and caused intense pain and untold suffering, not, only in the arm but throughout the entire body. No cure was possible and his misery was relieved only by death. (Photo from VACCINATION AND THE MEDICAL PROFESSION) Case XXV

AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY REVEALS STARTLING FACTS

The 1955 advertising circular sent out by the American Cancer Society, states:

"Cancer will strike one of every four persons now living according to the present estimates.

"MORE CHILDREN FROM 3 TO 15 YEARS OF AGE DIE OF CANCER THAN FROM ANY OTHER DISEASE".

This is a shocking, tragic situation when we consider that just a short time ago — less than 50 years — cancer was unheard of among children. It was, even then, a rare disease associated with old age degeneration. But today, after the intensive vaccination programs conducted several times a year in the schools, cancer has become so prevalent that it is now taking a death toll among the children that is almost unbelievable.

According to the report of the American Cancer Society, "The cancer death rate has increased from 65 persons per 100,000 in 1900 to 134.8 persons per 100,000 in 1948."

Newsweek magazine (April 25, 1955) stated that cancer took 128,000 lives in 1933. In 1953 (just 20 years later) the death rate from cancer had increased to 224,000 with an estimated cost of $175,000,000 in hospital bills and $12,000,000 yearly loss of productivity of the afflicted.

The recent 1955 report of the American Cancer Society, stating that cancer strikes one out of every four persons in the United States, means that 25 per cent of the people are cancerous. Our present population is 160,000,000. Every fourth person, or 25 per cent of our population amounts to 6,400,000 people. Is this our present cancer rate, as compared to only 224,000 two years ago in 1953? If these figures are right then our cancer rate has increased from 128,000 in 1933 to 6,400,000 in 1955 which is an increase of 6,272,000 cases of cancer in the short span of 22 years. This staggering increase in a preventable disease is a grave reflection upon our present system of living with its popularized blood pollution practices by way of vaccination campaigns and mass poisoning as a result of government enforced spraying of fruits and vegetables with deadly lead arsenate and other poisons. The power politics of the drug and chemical companies have also influenced legislation to set aside vast sums of the taxpayer’s money with which to buy their poison chemicals, such as chlorine, fluorides, etc., for contaminating the public water supply and for enforcing tuberculin testing of cows. The people are told that these practices are beneficial but facts disclaim these statements. (See the chapters on DRUGS vs. HEALTH and THE CASE AGAINST TUBERCULIN — Book II)

DOCTOR FORESEES A NATION OF INVALIDS

Dr. S. S. Goldwater, New York Commissioner of Hospitals pointed out in The Modern Hospital Magazine that the present measures used to check contagious diseases may permit of longer life — but not of stronger life. As a result of the drugs, vaccines and other suppressive treatments used to check diseases, he says that, "chronic diseases are growing at such a rate that America may become a nation of invalids. Over half the hospital beds are filled with chronic sufferers, both old and young." (from Health Practitioner’s Journal, June, 1944)

FAULTY CANCER RESEARCH IMPEDES PROGRESS

There is no argument against the urgent need for the prevention and cure of cancer. Doctors as well as laymen recognize the dangers of this advancing menace; but there is great confusion and conflict regarding theories and practices used in treating cancer. The medical and non-medical schools of healing have opposing views which set up a state of warfare between them instead of the unity and cooperation that should prevail in order to solve this critical problem.. A few of the drugless doctors are using cancer treatments that are 80 per cent more effective in removing cancer than those used and endorsed by the medical profession as a whole. But the monopolistic domination of the A.M.A. constantly thwarts these efforts toward improvement because they cannot collect the fees.

It is no secret that the newspapers are also muzzled by the A.M.A., and are not permitted to publish any health news, or information or advertise any books about health without the sanction of the Medical gestapo through their hirelings in the Better Business Bureaus. If health information reflects unfavorably on the medical profession or exposes its rackets it is immediately suppressed no matter how factual and critical to life it may be. The health books in tax supported public libraries and schools are also limited to the out-of-date, erroneous, "slanted" data passed upon or written by medical men.

THE MEDICALLY MADE IRON CURTAIN

Because of this medically made iron curtain, the public is shown only one side of the cancer picture and is constantly being drilled on the one theme endorsed by the medical hierarchy — that "there are only three proved ways — and only three — to curb cancer (1) X-ray, (2) radium, (3) and surgery, either singly or in combination. . . " (From CANCER FACTS — 1955 — by the American Cancer Society)

If it is true, as they state, that the medical profession has three proved ways to cure cancer, why is there such a rapid increase in cancer every year? Why do we see thousands of deaths occurring all the time, of those who have been treated by these "proved" methods? Also, why do we have this never ending fund raising cancer campaigns to support laboratories that are supposed to be hunting a cure for cancer? If one of these claims is true, it cancels out the other; that is:   if they have a proved cure for cancer then it proves that the cancer campaigns are merely money making schemes for the pleasure and profit of the promoters.  On the other hand, if they know that they have no cure and are deliberately taking money (large sums) from their patients under the false pretenses of offering a proved cure THAT DOES NOT CURE, but instead OFTEN KILLS THE PATIENTS, THEN THEY ARE ENGAGED IN FRAUDULENT PRACTICES and should be dealt with accordingly. The law is not lenient with fraud cases, even when they do no bodily harm. Many innocent drugless practitioners and writers of non-medical health books have been barred from the mails on fraud charges merely because they disagreed with accepted medical theories. (See chapter on MEDICAL INTERFERENCE)

90 PER CENT DIE OF MEDICALLY TREATED CANCER

Medical authorities, themselves, have estimated that "over 90 per cent of the medically diagnosed cases of cancer die of it in spite of frequent applications of both surgery and radiation." Dr. James Ewing, one of the "expert witnesses" at a Senate hearing, admitted this high death rate of medically treated cancer and further voiced the pessimistic view that he "did not believe there is any reasonable expectation of a great discovery entering the cancer field in this age." This indicates that he also believes that the cancer campaigns and laboratories are merely in the business for profit.

Although most of the confessions of failure have been made in the privacy of the medical conference chambers, a few of them have reached the public by way of reports in medical journals and sometime through legal investigation. One of the voluntary confessions was made by Dr. Raballiati, who stated, "In the early part of my career I performed over 500 major operations for cancer and growths, and it was the uniform lack of success with the knife that caused me to search for other means of more effectively treating cancer — though without success."

At the Atlantic City Convention of the American Medical Association, when each cancer specialist was asked what was the cause of cancer, each one in turn admitted he did not know. One of them said, "I admit I know neither the cause nor the cure of cancer — and neither do you, not anyone else here."

This statement, no doubt, voices the orthodox medical view regarding cancer. If they did know the cause of this disease they would not use the three hazardous treatments they claim are the only "proved cures".

CANCER — NO MYSTERY

Outside the medical field and among the few independent physicians who dare to think for themselves, there are to be found those who do know the cause and cure of cancer because they understand the underlying cause of disease in general. Only when this is known can the right approach to prevention and cure be attempted with any certainty of success.

Dr. Herbert M. Shelton is one of these men with a clear view as to the cause and control of disease. In an article in The Hygienic Review, for April, 1949 he writes:

"Cancer has no secret. It is but a part of general pathology (disease). It is an end-point in a chain of pathological sequences that need only to be watched to be recognized. There is no specific cause of cancer. It is merely another and final link in the pathological chain that began in infancy with the first cold. It is. a product of pathological evolution...

"They (the medical profession) insist upon viewing cancer as some spontaneous horror that suddenly springs upon its victims from out of the void. They refuse to recognize the office of the general causes of pathology in the production of cancer.

"So long as cancer "research" is only a search for a "cancer secret" that, after all, is but a figment of the imagination, their experiments will continue to be sterile repetitions of experiments that have already been performed .

"What, then, is the cause of cancer? It is an evolution out of toxemia (poisoning).  Toxemia is a chronic state, due to ones enervating (depleting) mode of living. Toxemia produces the chronic local irritative conditions that form the site of cancer. External irritations such as tobacco, mineral oil, alcohol, spices, coal tar products, drugs, etc., may and do add to the cause in many cases, but it is noteworthy that only a few of those subjected to these irritants develop cancer. In the absence of sufficient tissue degeneration from chronic toxemia, the body successfully resists these irritants."

J. Ellis Barker has this to say regarding the cause of cancer (This quotation is from his book on cancer, foreworded by Sir Arbuthnot Lane, famous English Surgeon and physician to the Royal Family of England.):

"The cause of cancer is two-fold: (1) chronic poisoning and (2) vitamin starvation." (The required vitamins do not include the manufactured products by that name many of which are coal tar products and injurious in themselves. The only vitamins worthy of the name are to be found in natural, unprocessed foods such as vegetables and fruits, nuts and grams Eleanor McBean) "The poison may be introduced from without or generated from within. In the former class are aniline and paraffin fumes, deep burns of any kind — including X-ray and radium burns, and arsenical poisons (as in arsenic insecticides sprayed on fruits and vegetables) whether breathed in through the lungs or taken as medicine into the system through the mouth or by subcutaneous injection." Mr. Barker quotes other authorities to show that "continued medical use of arsenic, even in extremely small doses, may lead to cancer after 20 years or more, and even after the discontinuance of the drug." He referred to the Silesian miners in the cobalt mines of Schineeverg, "who developed a most unusual form of cancer, cancer of the lungs, from breathing in arsenic after having been employed in the mines for more than 20 years." (Medical Voodoo, p. 207)

Dr. George S. Weger, a "reformed" medical doctor who rose head and shoulders above his colleagues, summed up the cancer situation, in his "Genesis and Control of Disease. (p. 334). He wrote:

"No germ for cancer has yet been found, and, in the author’s opinion none ever will be found. Cancer is one disease that is distinctive of toxemia, (poisoning) plus trauma, plus irritation. It occurs most frequently in selective areas but may be found anywhere in the body. No infection of secondary nature is necessary to make this abnormality a cancer by conversion from something else. If a cancerous mass breaks down, softens, and suppurates, it is usually in a late stage and signifies a serious breach in the defenses — the vitality of the individual — and the toxemia then immediately takes on the characteristics of sepsis which destroys the life of the blood.

"Some specialists advance the theory that cancer activity is dependent upon a vegetable parasite, a protozoa, identified as Trichomonas. It is conceded, however, that this parasite (if any) is not capable of producing cancer without the accompaniment of two other important factors: first, proper soilage (toxemia); second, continued irritation or injury."

Another cancer authority who recognized that toxemia or internal poisons cause cancer, is Dr. Robert Bell, Vice-President of the International Society for Cancer Research. His statement in The Medical Record for March, 1922 reads as follows: -

"Cancer is rooted in every drop of blood in the body, and we may as well expect to stop the growing of apples by picking them off the trees. . . as to expect to destroy malignancy in the human body by attacking the outward growth….. For depend on it, every cell of the body is affected, and has been affected for a long period, prior to the appearance of the local outcrop. . . In my view, cancer is the outcome of prolonged toxemia, and a vitiated (polluted) blood supply affecting the nervous system and the efficiency of the endocrine glands, which explains the absence of healthy-metabolism and the dire disturbance which we call cancer."

LYMPHATIC INVOLVEMENT IN CANCER

Without going into technical detail on this subject it is, nevertheless, important to show the relationship of the lymphatic glands to vaccinal cancer. The lymph vessels form a fine network that interpenetrates the connective tissue and covers the entire body. The continuity of these lymph vessels "is interrupted by interposed nodular aggregations of lymph tissue which are known as lymph glands." (Textbook of Anatomy — Cunningham) One of the functions of the lymph glands is to filter the poisons from circulation before they reach the cells. When an excess of poison is generated in the body or is introduced from the outside as in vaccination, the lymph glands become enlarged in an effort to collect and hold in abeyance, the accumulation of poison. In the case of blood poisoning or a bite of a poison insect a lump usually forms under the arm or in the groin, to meet the emergency, but disappears again when the condition has healed. In the case of the continued intake of poison such as tobacco, coffee, drugs, etc., the glands most effected keep enlarging to accommodate the inflow of poison. A protective coating of tissue is formed around the gland to protect the body from collected poisons. It is this wonderful defense mechanism that the body provides against the ignorance and willfulness of the individual, that the doctors attack as an enemy. They call it a wild growth of tissue — a cancer or tumor. To cut or burn (as with radium, X-ray or surgery) this bulwark of protection is to add insult to injury and allow the self-generated poisons to flow unchecked through the body and do serious damage to the vital organs, tissues and glands.

Dr. J. Morrison, former Professor of Chemistry and Toxicology in the Medical Department of the National University at Washington, D. C., had ample opportunity to observe the lymphatic involvement in cancer and other diseases during his many years as a specialist in nervous and chronic diseases. He was formerly a member of the Medical Council and Examiner in the College of Physicians and Surgeons, (Ontaria, Canada). Regarding cancer he said:

"Cancer can only attack the organs and tissues moderately or abundantly supplied by the lymphatic circulation . . . Therefore, cancer is a disease of the lymphatic system "per Se" in the same sense that tuberculosis is regarded as a disease of the lungs or respiratory system."

Speaking of causes he had this to say: "Two well-known causes of this fatal malady are, (1) nicotine (tobacco) poisoning and (2) vaccination, which is certainly the most prolific cause of both external and internal cancer. . . Vaccine virus poisons the lymphatic system, impairs its function and lays the foundation for internal cancer, for which there has hitherto been no (successful medical) treatment or relief."

In Ontario, Canada, vaccination is very, very seldom performed and it is not a mere coincidence that cancer is exceedingly rare there. On the other hand, Massachusetts, in the United States, is one of the nine backward states that defy the Constitution in forcing vaccination upon school children The cancer rate is so high there, that there have been established more cancer hospitals per population than in other states not under compulsory vaccination laws. However the multiplying of medical hospitals has never solved the cancer problems because their methods defy the laws of nature, ignore the cause and purpose interfere with the orderly healing efforts of the body. As long as continue to attempt to remove the cancer without of poison) so long will they meet with failure or, at best, see the temporary appearance of success. Some of the patients may survive the medical treatments and have no return of the cancer, so far as outward symptoms are concerned, and yet the interference with the protective efforts of the lymphatic system may release the poisons into the blood and cause heart trouble or some other chronic disease.

Some of the most observant doctors have recognized the hazards of cutting or tampering with a growth on the body. Dr. Leo Loeb, of the University of Pennsylvania, sometimes referred to as "the father of cancer research in America", said that he learned early in his cancer practice that "merely drawing a silken thread through a benign, slowly-developing tumor would transform it into a malignant, rapidly developing one," and that cutting with a knife had the same effect.

In spite of this knowledge among the best qualified authorities, the cutting and burning is continued (with X-ray, radium and surgery) — no doubt because it is so profitable. The latest cancer propaganda urges the women to do some self-diagnosing and hunt for lumps on the breasts. These lumps are nothing but overworked lymphatic glands and since most people are toxic they will find some that will feel tender. The medical advice is that they should rush to the nearest hospital and have them operated on, but the advice of common sense and sound reasoning is to leave them alone and do some internal housecleaning in the form of fasting and proper diet.

DOES DIET HAVE ANY EFFECT ON CANCER?

The American Cancer Society, in a circular entitled FACTS AND FALLACIES ABOUT CANCER says: "Cancer is not caused or cured by any known diet." Since most of the statements in that leaflet are false, this one is not to be taken seriously either. Abundant evidence to the contrary proves this claim to be without foundation in fact.

Dr. Willard Parker, who for 30 years held the chair of surgery at Columbia University Medical School was quoted as saying:

"Luxurious living, and particularly excess in animal food, increases the waste products of the body, which if retained in the system have a tendency to produce abnormal growths . . . Cancer is to a great degree one of the final results of a long continued course of error in diet, and a strict dietetic regimen is, therefore, a chief factor in the treatment — preventive and curative."

Another authoritative voice to be heard on this subject is that of Dr. Horace Packard who in an address to the Homeopathic Surgical and Gynecological Society of Chicago in 1915 said:

"Some critical examination of the habits of life of civilized, cancer-plagued people, in comparison with the habits of primitive, cancer-free people, shows that the main difference between them is in a dietary poor in mineral salts among the cancer plagued and a dietary rich in mineral salts among the cancer-free people, the most logical and rational course is to adopt this as a keynote to cancer treatment."

Mineral salt, needless to say, does not mean common table salt (sodium chloride) which is a poison irritant in itself, and excessive use of which can cause death in a few hours. The foods high in mineral salts are fresh vegetables, fruits, seeds, nuts, grains, sea plants, etc.

This partly accounts for the remarkable recoveries of cancer patients who had been given up as hopeless by the medical doctors but who went on a simple fast followed by a grape diet or carrot juice diet at home. Many reports have been received of recovery from cancer of the stomach after a systematic raw carrot juice and vegetable diet but the carrot juice had a negative effect on cancer of the liver. Many cases of external and internal cancer have been reported cured as a result of a fast followed by a 30-day diet of fresh (unsprayed) grapes. Some used crushed grape leaf poultices on the external cancer. Others have recovered on an extended fast including water but no food or juices. One cancer patient did not respond to this or any other treatment. She had been under medical care and had received the full course of X-ray, radium and surgery, before she decided to go to a drugless sanitarium to try the fasting and diet regimen. Even fasting cannot save the patient when cell degeneration has advanced to the point where a large percentage of a vital organ has been destroyed. However, even these hopeless cases experience an easy and more painless death by fasting, this is far superior to morphine or other drugs.

HOW SHALL WE LEARN ABOUT FASTING?

Since fasting (the foundation of healing) is not taught in the schools, not even medical schools, where healing should be taught, how shall we learn the correct technique of this important healing measure. Few writers are sufficiently experienced in fasting to be qualified to write on this subject, therefore there are only a very few dependable books available that should be used as guides. As wonderful as the fast is in eliminating pain, and disease it should be preceded by a thorough study of the technique of fasting in order to know what to do about the reactions or healing crises that occur from time to time as the accumulation of toxins are brought into circulation to be eliminated. These reactions may be in the form of fainting, vomiting, diarrhea, coughing or some other violent cleansing effort. Unless the patient understands the situation he may become alarmed and call a doctor who would give drugs to suppress the discharges. All drugs are poison and poisons at this critical time could cause death. The most experienced fasting authority in this country is Dr. Herbert M. Shelton who has fasted thousands of patients with almost miraculous results. Therefore, his book on fasting, (Volume II— of THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM) is the standard authority on the subject. THERAPEUTIC FASTING by Arnold De Vries is another reliable book. This author fasted 45 days to test this system after studying many of the best books on the subject. There are several other books that cover the subject of the fast but do not give sufficient data on breaking the fast and how to follow it up. The right way to end or break the fast is as important as the fast itself and can be dangerous if the wrong foods are eaten at this time. The appetite returns after a complete fast and the patient may be tempted to eat some of the same foods he considered nourishing before the fast, only to learn that his body chemistry has normalized during the fast and many wrong foods will react as poisons. For instance, one person broke the fast on two chocolate bars and soon died as a result of it. Chocolate contains a poisonous drug (theobromine) which is almost as harmful as the drugs in coffee. Another person broke the fast on beef steak and fried potatoes and also died soon after. No one dies of a fast if it is properly conducted and terminated. Most medical doctors think that fasting is starving but the average person, even a sick person, can fast 40 days before the starvation process even begins to take place. This point is usually indicated by the pink, clean tongue, which has been gray and coated during the fast. This is the cue to break the fast, as the cleansing is completed. If the fast is continued after that point the body begins to use some of the tissues of lesser importance in the starvation process. Fasting is never intended to extend into the starving period, therefore fasting is not starving.

WHAT KILLED BERNARR MACFADDEN?

The newspapers quoted the doctors as saying that Bernarr MacFadden died of a three-day fast. They also quoted his lawyer as saying the same thing. The lawyer, Harry Gilgulin, was shocked when he read the statement he was supposed to have made. Excerpts from a published letter (Hygienic Review, Jan 1956) refuting this statement are as follows: "I could never have made such a statement since I myself fasted some eight or nine times for a total of 175 days and benefitted enormously from each of these fasts. . . Three of my fasts were of 30 days duration and my wife’s two fasts were of 34 and 30-day duration.. . As a staunch supporter and enthusiastic advocate of hygienic living and an ardent believer in fasting, it must be obvious to you that I could never have made the statement attributed to me by the newspapers.

"What I did tell the reporters was that whenever Mr. MacFadden didn’t feel well, he would go on a short fast of several days duration . . . He had fasted three days but broke the fast improperly by one small glass of fruit juice in the morning and a meat meal with eight or more pals of butter in the evening and that the improper breaking of the fast is not only dangerous but may lead to dire consequences and even death."

Mr. MacFadden was taken to the hospital and what they did to him in the way of shots and medicines was not stated, but he died soon after being taken to the hospital. People do not die of three day fasts, especially athletic men like MacFadden who are used to fasting. I talked to a man who had just completed a 21 day fast to restore his eyesight. He had been totally blind for 9 months. The fast had cleansed his blood stream enough to enable the opaque film over his eyes to dissolve and he was reading a newspaper when I met him. Soon after that I talked with a man who had just completed a 60 day fast to cure a persistant case of psoriasis. He was entirely healed after the fast on water — no food or juices — and had so improved in health and strength that he was helping the workmen dig a swimming pool at Dr. Bernard C. Jensen’s health sanitarium where he fasted.

Dr. Shelton, in his Hygienic SYSTEM, Vol. 7, page 613 said:

"The effects of fasting are certain. There is nothing hit-or-miss about the process. It works always in the same general direction."

This deviation into the subject of fasting and diet may seem a little off the subject in a chapter on cancer yet it is of great importance in that it offers the best solution to the cancer problem. In fact it is the basis of healing of all diseases, with the possible exception of those which are products of the imagination. Even in those cases a fast would help the mental and emotional re-adjustment.

Since beginning this chapter on cancer my attention has been called to a severe, seemingly hopeless case of cancer of seven years standing. The woman has been a bed patient, unable to walk for many years. Recently she abandoned her medical treatment and, as a last resort, decided to try what her doctors called a "crackpot diet." This simple diet, so frowned upon by medical men, is nothing but freshly made carrot juice, one or two quarts a day, a glass or so every hour. After six days on this carrot juice she had the first peaceful night’s sleep, without pain, in seven years. At the end of two weeks she could walk, with aid, to the car and go for a ride. Distressing reactions will no doubt, be experienced within four more weeks but she will be prepared and understand what to do. She has learned that there is hope of recovery from cancer and all diseases when the simple laws of nature are understood and followed.

WHAT’S WRONG WITH EARLY DIAGNOSIS?

The medical profession boasts of having "three proved cures for cancer" namely X-ray, radium and surgery, and yet the cancer-rate continues to mount year after year. When people ask the reason for this, the doctor’s favorite answer is: "The patients came too late — early diagnosis would have saved them." We might be able to believe this argument if it were not for the fact that there never was a time in recorded history when there was so much early diagnosis as right now in this country.

This mass diagnosis starts at the tender age of four and a half years when the children start to kindergarten. The teachers are instructed to examine the children every day for obvious symptoms of disease and report it to the school nurse. The nurse examines them, herself, each week and reports her findings to the doctors and the doctors and dentists come in for their check once or twice a year to round up considerable business for themselves by frightening the parents into needless treatments and operations for their children. The tonsils are the most vulnerable targets of these "mixed up" doctors. Tonsils are very necessary lymphatic glands of filtration that enlarge when the body is overloaded with incompatible foods and drugs. Certain drugless doctors claim and have proved that enlarged tonsils are 100 per cent curable under the right non-medical treatment.

The public is bombarded with cancer literature stressing the need for early diagnosis. The people are even told to do their own diagnosis — hunt for lumps on the breast, growths, moles, sores, etc., that could be treated as cancer. And yet, the doctors, themselves, don’t even know how to detect cancer in many cases. No wonder there is so much confusion, suffering and death with so many blind leaders of the blind. On page 8 of the Doctor’s Manual put out by the American Cancer Society we read:

"It is a well-known fact that a considerable number of malignant tumors are not recognized by the doctors themselves when the patients present the early symptoms of the disease. The early diagnosis of cancer is the one factor of greatest importance in the successful control of the disease, but unfortunately the early symptoms of cancer are not distinctive, and serve only to arouse suspicion of the presence of the disease . . . In most situations, the dictum holds true that the more certain the diagnosis the less the probability of cure."

So here we have the admission from the medical cancer field, that they are not sure how to detect cancer until it is too advanced to be cured.

I have had patients tell me that when they went to the doctor with a painful lump the doctor said it had not reached the cancer stage and they had nothing to prevent its developing into cancer but to come back in a few months when it had turned to cancer and they could use their standard "cures" (?) radium, X-ray, and surgery.

During the frenzy of one of the Cancer Week scare campaigns, someone asked the question, "Is there not some danger in developing "cancerphobia" in the public mind by this scare-head publicity?"

Dr. John Cerster, chairman of the New York Committee of the Society for Control of Cancer, replied that "it would be a good thing if it did; anything that would scare the people into going to a physician for an examination would be beneficial."

The financial benefit to the doctors is apparent but the benefit to the people is in reverse ratio to the amount of diagnosis and treatment given. This is obvious since the cancer rate has quadrupled within the past ten years.

Dr. G. Earl Thomas has charged that, "CANCER IS THE MOST PROFITABLE DISEASE THAT THE MEMBERS OF THE A.M.A. HAVE."

One of the noted American cancer authorities, Dr. L. Duncan Bulkley, senior surgeon of the New York Skin and Cancer Hospital, denounced the popular medical claim that cancer is a "surgical disease" when he stated:

"Cancer is not a surgical disease. Neither surgery not X-ray nor radium have changed, in anyway whatever, the ultimate mortality of cancer in forty years. It was 90 per cent in 1884. Now it is 92 percent".

For more details on the other side of the cancer question see the book, IS CANCER CURABLE? published by Health Research.

CHAPTER VI
SYPHILIS AND VACCINATION

"If syphilis were as infectious as most medical men believe it to be, there would not be an uninfected person in the world."—John Tilden, M.D.

Dr. M. Ricord, one of the most noted authorities on syphilitic affections, in a lecture to medical men in Paris, said:

"At first I repelled the idea that syphilis could be transmitted by vaccination.

The recurrence of facts appearing more and more confirmatory, I accepted the possibility of this mode of transmission, I should say, with reserve, and even with repugnance; but today, in the face of all these facts I hesitate no more to proclaim their reality Who, pray, will run such a risk to escape smallpox?"

Dr Brundenell Carter, surgeon to St George s Hospital, London, observed: "I think that a large proportion of the cases of apparently inherited syphilis are in reality vaccinal; and that the syphilis in these cases does not show itself until the age of from eight to ten years, by which time the relation between cause (vaccination) and effect (syphilis) are lost sight of."

Dr. Ballard, one of the vaccine inspectors for the English government stated:

There can be no doubt that the vaccine virus and the syphilitic virus may both be drawn at the same time, upon the same instrument, from one and the same vesicle. The vesicle which is thus capable of furnishing both vaccine and syphilitic virus may present, prior to being opened, all the normal and fully developed characters of the true Jennerian vesicle as ordinarily met with"

In his book entitled COMPULSORY VACCINATION, from his years’ world wide research, Dr. J. M. Peebles (M.D., Ph.D.) gave an account of seventeen school girls who developed syphilis as a result of vaccination at Lebus, near Frankfort Yet the vaccinator’s report stated that the vaccinations were from the regular, official calf-lymph "absolutely pure, glycerinated, sterilized, all germs but the ‘vaccine sporule’, destroyed, hermetically sealed until used."

Protesting the vaccination laws in various cities he says:

"Think of it, fathers and mothers, who would bring your daughters up to be comely, chaste and pure, that your state and municipality should place you under absolute compulsion to observe a rite to taint these maidens with the disease against which civilization revolts."

Nichols adds, "At the present time little children are subject to the assault (with a deadly weapon—the poisoned needle) , and a healthy, unvaccinated child, in the eye of the law, is considered a nuisance and as dangerous at time of an epidemic as a mad dog."

"Viewed in this light," Nichols continues, (in his BLUNDER IN POISONS page 41) the blunder, perhaps of greater gravity than that of transmission of tuberculosis by vaccination, again becomes the crime; vaccination for mere business interest would be (and is) a deliberate assault on the health of a community, and the medical man committing the assault might well be termed ‘a perverter of common sense and an enemy of the human race’ ".

In THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION (35) Dr. J. W. Hodge writes:

"Think of the unparalleled absurdity of deliberately infecting the organism of a healthy child with the poisonous matter obtained from the sores of a sick animal, under the pretense of protecting the victim of the ingrafted disease, against the contagion of another disease.

"So-called successful vaccination is nothing less than the implanting into the body, the virulent products of diseased animal tissue, with the effect of inducing actual disease. The performance of such an operation, in the very nature of the case, violates every principle of modern aseptic surgery, the legitimate aim of which is to remove from the organism the products of disease and never to introduce them."

Professor Scott Tebb, in a treatise against compulsory vaccination stated:
"Once admitted that the risk of contracting venereal disease is real, and one which no amount of care can guard against even if vaccination were a preventive of smallpox, all ground for compulsion vanishes, for it then becomes a ground for personal responsibility, as in any other operation or treatment involving risk of life and health No surgeon would dream of administering chloroform or per-forming the most trivial operation without first gaining the patient’s consent, and therefore, no authority, whether medical or state, has the right to override the patient s scruples Compulsory vaccination is now beginning to be recognized, even by medical men, as a grievous and mischievous mistake, and I have not the slightest doubt that the profession would gladly relinquish it tomorrow, if their credit and prestige were not so deeply involved."

So enormous are the profits from vaccination that many efforts are made by members of the medical profession to minimize the dangers of syphilis caused by vaccination. One of these, Dr. Henry A. Martain, of Boston wrote a paper denying the possibility of syphilitic infection from this cause. The London Lancet (Medical Journal) in criticizing this paper said: "The notion that animal lymph would be free from chances of syphlitic contamination is so fallacious that we are surprised to see Dr. Martain reproduce it."

Professor Fournier said: "A real and serious danger incurred in vaccination is that every (vaccinated) individual is destined to undergo, one or several times in his life the danger of vaccinal syphilis. For myself alone, I have knowledge of two actual epidemics of this disease (vaccinal syphilis)".

ENCYCLOPEDIA ON VACCINAL SYPHILIS

In the Encyclopedia Britannica (9^th edition) under the heading "Smallpox— Cowpox," Dr. Charles Creighton says:

"The real affinity of cowpox is not to smallpox, but to the great pox (syphilis). The vaccinal roseola is not only very like the syphilitic roseola, but it means the same sort of thing. The vaccinal ulcer of everyday practice is, to all intents and purposes, a chancre (syphilitic ulcer)."

"The photographs, Fig. 1 and 2 show the marked similarity between the smallpox vaccination roseola and the syphilis ulcer.

In his voluminous work on vaccination Crookshank tells us that "Auzias Turenne, of France, was the first to point out that cowpox is analagous to syphilis; but even the earliest opponents of vaccination regarded the disease as "lues bovilla", (syphilis) and it had even been suggested that the cow had derived the complaint from milkers who were affected with syphilis. However, there is no more ground for believing in the latter theory than there is for believing that cowpox is produced by milkers suffering from smallpox.

It is the course which the malady runs which brings it so closely into relations with syphilis…….There appears to be very little doubt that syphilis may be transmitted by vaccination; but many cases which are attributed to syphilis are unquestionably the full effects of cowpox virus; and nothing could more clearly point to the analogy between the two diseases than the difficulty in diagnosing the exact nature of vaccinal accidents (diseases)".

"Again, if we study the effects of syphilis artificially inoculated on the human subject, the appearance in some cases are strikingly similar to inoculated horse-pox. Without entering into a prolonged discussion of this subject, I will refer, as an example, to the progress in Dr. Ricord’s cases of syphilization. As in inoculated horse-pox we have the stages of papule, vesicle, ulcer, scab and scar; and no one can compare his plates with Jenner’s without being struck with the similarity in their appearances. (See Fig. 2 and 3)

Fig. 3

"The results of the artificial inoculation of syphilis were unknown to Jenner, but if they had been he would scarcely have failed to have observed the likeness between them. So striking indeed are the appearances, that it is possible that. by judicious selection, a strain of syphilitic lymph might be cultivated which would produce in time, all the physical characteristics of the ‘vaccine’ vesicle."

MORE EVIDENCE

In THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION by J. W. Hodge, M.D. we read:

"To the scientific physician, conclusive evidence of the real affinity of cowpox is furnished at a glance, by the pathological diagnostic table of M. R. Leverson, M.D., Ph. D. . .. which was read before the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons at Indianapolis, (Jan. 1896) and has been unquestioned by the profession.

"The table which I now present to you, is a condensed statement in paralleled columns, of the primary and secondary symptoms of smallpox, cowpox and syphilis, from the separate descriptions of the most renowned authorities upon these several diseases. It shows an almost complete likeness between the two latter and the total unlikeness of each to (natural, uninduced) smallpox. Here we have some of the highest authorities who have produced the clearest evidence showing that vaccinia (vaccination disease) is modified syphilis. The chronic and protean manifestations which, at times, follow vaccination must have impressed us all with their close analogy to syphilitic lesions."

COMPARISON OF SMALLPOX, COWPOX AND SYPHILIS

SMALLPOX

1 — Eruption general, superficial.
2 — Constitutional or general symptoms precede the eruption and are relieved on appearance.
3 — Eruption first felt as a No. 8 bird shot beneath the skin, it then appears as a papule; then a vesicle, becoming pustular about the 5th or 6th day, is from one to three lines in length; but the pustules are of various kinds, irregular, elevated, generally perforated by a hair, induration, if any, very slight, no tendency to gnawing ulceration of the skin.
4 — The fluid is contained in two chambers — a superficial and a deep, which communicate around the edges of the separating membrane.
5 — The smallpox pustules leave no scar if properly treated.
6 — The smallpox eruption does not affect the lymphatic system.
7 — Infectious.
8 — Inoculable.
9 — The smallpox epidemic seems to be taking its rise in filthy locations. (also, when the body is contaminated with vaccines, drugs and incompatible foods and impure water, etc.)

COWPOX (vaccination) Primary Lesion

1. Eruption local, deep, in corium of skin or subcutaneous tissue or in mucous membrane.
2 — Constitutional symptoms do not precede but follow the eruption in all cases.
3 — Pustule (chancre) always the same, first a papule, then a vesicle, becoming pustular about the 8th day, 7 to 10 lines in diameter, round, centrally depressed, margin indurated and not perforated by a hair, has a cellular membrane at floor, tendency to gnawing ulceration.
4. The fluid is contained in a single chamber, reticulated, is non-volatile, and the infection is communicated only by immediate contact with an abraded surface.
5 — The cowpox leaves a foveated scar.
6 — The cowpox poison permeates the lymphatic channels and ganglia, causing inflammation, buboes, and abscesses.
7 — Not infectious.
8 — Inoculable.
9 — Cowpox is independent of time and place; communicated only by direct inoculation.

SYPHILIS or Greatpox

1 — Eruption local, deep, in the corium of skin or subcutaneous tissue, or in the mucous membrane.
2 — Constitutional symptoms do not precede but follow the eruption in all cases.
3 — Pustule always the same, first a papule rapidly becoming pustular without perceptibly passing through a vesicular stage, 7 to 10 lines in diameter, scooped out, deep funnel-shaped with sloping often elevated, .not perforated by a hair, has a fungoid membrane at floor, tendency to a gnawing ulceration.
4 — Absolutely the same as the cowpox.
5 — Similar to the scar of cowpox.
6 — Absolutely the same as the cowpox.
7 — Not infectious.
8 — Inoculable.
9 — Absolutely the same as cowpox.

"The smallpox patient, upon recovery, is free from the disease even if he is marked by scars. Smallpox will not beget cowpox or syphilis.

"On the contrary, there are various subsequent manifestations in vaccination, or cowpox, which are remarkably like those that appear in what are known as secondary and tertiary periods of syphilis.

"We have tabulated in parallel columns some of the many manifestations that appear in both these diseases, and a glance will reveal their striking similarity."

MANIFESTATIONS OF AFTER-EFFECTS OF

WHY VACCINATION CANNOT IMMUNIZE AGAINST SMALLPOX

Smallpox, to a large extent, went out when improved sanitation came in, except in countries where vaccination is compulsory. There the smallpox epidemics continue to ravage the population at frequent intervals.

Un-refutable, scientific evidence proves that smallpox and cowpox are not the same disease, therefore, cowpox vaccination cannot introduce anti-bodies into the system that fight smallpox, as is claimed by the medical doctors.

As stated before, smallpox, (as well as disease in general,) is an enforced cleansing effort of the body. If the patients get eruptive diseases, like smallpox, after vaccination it merely indicates that they have internal vitality enough to throw off some of the excess poison in this violent way. Usually, however, the vaccine poison so lowers the resistance of the body that it cannot rally enough reserves for a defensive action in the form of an eruptive disease. Therefore, the poisons are retained where they corrode and destroy the tissues of the heart, kidneys, lungs and other vital organs. This suppression of symptoms and masking of one disease with another — this delayed reaction in disease causation — is what the medical profession calls the conquering of disease by antibiotics.

Dr. Chauven, in an address before the French Academy of medicine, October, 1891, reviewed the results of his years of detailed and carefully tested experiments. In the face of undeniable facts he was forced to the conclusion that:

(1) "Vaccine virus never gives smallpox to anyone." (Although it produces many diseases, some of which resemble smallpox and are diagnosed as smallpox and are more damaging than smallpox.)

(2) "Vaccinia (disease produced by vaccination) is not even attenuated smallpox.

"Vaccinia is, in all probability, a modified form of syphilis, as has been clearly pointed out by Doctors Charles Creighton and E. M. Crookshank, Professor of Pathology and Bacteriology in King’s College, London, two of the highest authorities on these subjects."

CHAPTER 7
OTHER DISEASES CAUSED BY VACCINATION

"Are we the issue of an inferior stock, or are we inferior representatives of men who were physically and culturally our superiors?"—From Genesis and Control of Disease — Weger

Even now, in what is sometimes called the enlightened age, we still hear some people, (not so enlightened) claim or repeat what they have been taught to say, that "vaccination has reduced smallpox and certain other diseases, and has been a blessing to mankind." Those who make this claim have not bothered to consult authentic records or become acquainted with the most elementary facts on the subject.

When traced down, these statements are found to originate from the fabricated propaganda of those who profit from the sale of serums and drugs. Unfortunately many of these people are in places of authority where they influence the thinking of students, writers, public officials, teachers and others who mold the thinking of the masses. These errors in theory and practice have steadily reduced our nations health to a state of crisis in which 90 per cent of the people are either critically ill or below par, physically or mentally.

In addition to the vaccination diseases treated separately in other chapters, there are a number of other serious diseases that have been traced directly to vaccination. Some of the most noticeably persistent of these will be treated in this chapter.

GOVERNMENT REPORTS REVEAL MORE DEATHS FROM VACCINATION THAN FROM SMALLPOX

Dr. D. Killick Millard, Medical Officer of Health, (Leicester, England) in reporting on this subject stated (in his book THE VACCINATION QUESTION):

"It cannot be denied that vaccination causes, in the aggregate, very considerable injury to health, most of it only temporary (?) but some permanent. It is true that the deaths certified as due to vaccination . . . have several times outnumbered those from smallpox, while if we have regard for the amount of ill-health caused by the two diseases . . . it looks as if vaccinia were becoming, so far as the community is concerned, the more serious disease of the two."

30,438 SOLDIERS WERE STRICKEN BY VACCINATION DISEASE

The Report of the Surgeon General of the Army, (1919) vol. I, page 37, gives the number of admissions to hospitals during the year 1918, on account of vaccinia (vaccination disease) as 10,830.

The Report of the Surgeon General of the Army, (1918) gives me the number of admissions to hospitals during the year 1917, on account of vaccinia and vaccinal-typhoid combined as 19,608.

Here we find that in only two years of the war and in only one army there were over 30,000 soldiers hospitalized by vaccination. This does not take into consideration the thousands who were seriously ill but not critical enough to be hospitalized, nor the cases of chronic disease that developed later as a result of the cumulative effects of poisons from vaccines and drugs.

Herbert Spencer, in his "History of Epidemics in Great Britain" voiced the sentiments of the best authorities when he said:

"Vaccination, in subduing one disease only increases others."

Charles M. Higgins made an extensive and thorough world-wide investigation and study of the vaccination question and reported most of the pertinent data in his book "The Horrors of Vaccination Exposed." In his effort to bring the dangers of vaccination to the attention of the people he, for several years, carried a paid advertisement in one of the large New York dailies, challenging the New York City and State Health Departments to open their books, and he "would undertake to prove from their own records that THERE HAD BEEN MORE DEATHS FROM VACCINATION THAN FROM SMALLPOX IN NEW YORK, EVERY YEAR FOR THE PAST 15 YEARS."

His challenge was never accepted. The facts were not reported to the people and the killing of innocent children has continued without interruption, down through the years.

DEFECTIVE TEETH AND EYESIGHT TRACED TO VACCINATION

In his book, "Vaccination a Disastrous Delusion" (p. 13) Ernest McCormick, discussed the findings of the researcher, Sir James Paget as follows:

"In the same cause he finds a probable explanation for the defective eyesight and dentition which have become so prevalent, giving examples to show that, owing to the teeth and sense organs arising out of the dermal layer in the embryo, skin diseases, of which vaccination is one, are likely to produce abnormalities in all of these. According to the LANCET (British Medical Journal 1904) 85 per cent of school children have defective teeth and 3,000 servicemen (all vaccinated) were returned from South Africa, from that cause alone, while the Navy is still worse in that respect.

Sir William Osler (M.D.), in his PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MEDICINE, in discussing the various characteristics of vaccinia says:

"About the end of the first week: Generalized vaccina; impetigo; vaccinal ulceration; glandular abscess; septic infections; gangrene."

Dr. Osler is one of the most completely accepted and respected authorities on medicine in the world. He was Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford University and Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians (London), and Honorary Professor of Medicine at Johns Hopkins University, (U.S.). He knew the financial importance of vaccination (to the medical profession) and he knew the professional hazards of making any unfavorable statements about vaccination, yet he publicly admitted that some of the most loathsome and painful diseases including leprosy and syphilis were caused by vaccination.

Ricardo Corfield, of Lowell Ave., Providence, Rhode Island, was vaccinated at the age of 5 years and 4 months in order to secure admission to school. His arm swelled and the ulcer enlarged until pieces of decayed flesh dropped off leaving the bone exposed. On September 5th the tendons under the right knee became so enlarged and painful that the child cried out in agony. An incision was made and more than a quart of putrid, brown matter exuded. The shin bone rotted off." (from — "Victims of State Poisoning", published by Liberator Pub. Co., Minneapolis, Minn.)

FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE CAUSED BY VACCINATION

"The Department of Agriculture, in its efforts to suppress the foot-and-mouth disease traced the disease to the vaccine virus imported into the United States by our manufacturing chemists and sold to our people. The investigation revealed that the virus, used upon calves in the District of Columbia, communicated the foot-and mouth disease to them." (From the Declaration by the late Senator Dolliver, of Iowa, in an address to the United States Senate, February 25, 1909.)

From the FARMER’S BULLETIN, (page 15) April 22, 1915, published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, we have the following statement:

"The foot-and-mouth disease is primarily a disease of cattle; secondarily and casually, a disease of man. . . It is probable that the infection may be communicated to man if the virus directly enters the blood through wounds of any kind (including vaccination) . . . The symptoms in man resemble those observed in animals."

WHAT OTHER AUTHORITIES SAY ABOUT VACCINATION AND DISEASE

Dr. William Hitchman, Consulting Surgeon to the Cancer Hospital of Leeds and formerly public vaccinator to the City of Liverpool, expressly stated that, ‘Syphi1is, abdominal phthisis, scrofula, cancer, erysipelas, and almost all diseases of the skin, have been either conveyed, or intensified by vaccination."

Dr. Peebles, (world renowned researcher and authority on vaccination) stated in his book on Compulsory Vaccination:

"We shall never stamp out smallpox, cancer, consumption, or leprosy, so long as we continue to STAMP THEM IN through the idiotic and vicious practice of vaccination. The Germans endeavored to stamp out syphilis by stamping it in with syphilized vaccine. They have abandoned that practice now and in time they will abandon vaccination altogether."

In the Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition), under the title of VACCINATION, by Dr. Charles Chreighton, we find some carefully authenticated statistics showing that vaccination has caused a great many cases of syphilis, cancer, tumors, scrofula, eczema, tuberculosis, etc.

In his VACCINE AND SERUM EVILS (page 6) Dr. Herbert M. Shelton discusses some of the complications that often accompany or follow vaccination. He writes:

"Abscess, sloughing, cellulitis, erysipelas, syphilis, leprosy, tuberculosis, tetanus(lock jaw), actinomycosis (big jaw), general septic infection, urticarial eruptions, ‘paralysis, meningitis, sleeping sickness, etc., may follow vaccination . . . In some instances the abcess that may form, refuses to heal. I saw one case of this kind where the abscess continued to discharge pus after 14 years."

From the high ranking medical authority Dr. William Osler we have this concession:

"Syphilis has undoubtedly been transmitted by vaccination."

Under the topic heading, INFLUENCE OF VACCINATION UPON OTHER DISEASES, Dr. Osler says:

"A quiescent malady may be lighted into activity by vaccination. This happens with congenital syphilis and occasionally with tuberculosis . . . At the height of the vaccination, convulsions may occur and be followed by hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body)."

Our recent "vaccination" wars have presented a dismal picture of paralysis among the soldiers with large hospital wards filled with paraplegics (paralysis of both sides) and hemiplegics (paralysis of one side.) Thus we see that the doctors know and the government knows what vaccination is doing to our service men and civilians. Why have they turned their "blind side" to it and allowed it to continue?

VACCINATION INCREASES COMMON DISEASES SUCH AS MEASLES INFLUENZA, CHICKEN-POX, MUMPS, SCARLET FEVER, ETC.

Not only do vaccine poisons cause some of the strange and terrible diseases that baffle the doctors, but these same poisons also increase the incidence of the common "zymotic" diseases such as measles, chicken-pox, mumps, scarlet fever, etc., which are usually referred to as "contagious diseases." These diseases are not contagious but are merely cleansing measures of the body in its effort to eliminate some of the excess poison and waste matter.

CITY SURVEY BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINATION SHOWS INCREASE IN DISEASE

Wherever an honest survey is made after a vaccination campaign it is noticed that there is always a marked increase in disease. Thomas Morgan, in his "Medical Delusions" reports a survey that was made of the city of Youngstown, Ohio, after a general vaccination order of school children. "It was found that nearly all the cases of scarlet fever, measles and diphtheria had been recently vaccinated.

What is true of this city is true everywhere, and any close observer can satisfy himself in this direction."

After reading this I decided to "satisfy myself in this direction" as suggested; so I obtained a LOS ANGELES COUNTY HEALTH INDEX, which gives the weekly record of diseases for the entire year (this was 1954).

I was amazed to find that the common diseases mentioned by Morgan, more than doubled after the annual June vaccination campaign. The figures are given below and will speak for themselves.

CHART SHOWING INCREASE IN DISEASE BEFORE AND AFTER VACCINATION CAMPAIGN

FALSIFIED SMALLPOX REPORTS

In numerous reports we find incontestable proof from government records and hospital data, etc., that smallpox increased in the countries having compulsory vaccination. It is only natural that it should do so because the admitted purpose of vaccination is to engraft a mild form of smallpox into the patient. Because there is no test and no control that can assure a mild case, we find that the induced disease is often more severe than natural smallpox, and frequently terminates in death.

In disregard to the known facts and the statements of the world’s greatest medical authorities on the subject, the Los Angeles (city and county) health departments claim that their annual vaccination campaigns have absolutely wiped out smallpox in the county. In this large population of 4,000,000 people (Los Angeles county) with its thousands of people infected with disease in each vaccination drive, and the increase of all other diseases after each of these blood 5 poisoning sprees, the record department omits from the records all the smallpox cases and issues the report that "there has not been one case of smallpox in the county for the past ten years." In the complete record of 48 diseases reported, jsmallpox was the only one on the list that showed no report of cases.

When a "cover-up" job is over-done it makes people suspicious so I went to the County Hospital to check more closely. They willingly gave me the information I asked for on all other diseases except smallpox. The record department flatly refused to let me see those records or even know if these were any cases at that time in the hospital.

Disgusted, but not discouraged, I walked across the grounds toward the contagion ward and met a nurse coming from there. I walked with her and chatted a bit then asked her if there were any cases of smallpox in her department. She said, "Yes". I asked how many there were and she said, "I haven’t any idea." I said, "I take it from that, that there are more than a half a dozen?" She said, "Oh, yes — I haven’t been assigned the job of counting them so I really don’t know." I said, "Are you sure they are smallpox and not just chickenpox" She said, "They’re smallpox. We keep them separate from the chickenpox."

I rushed back to the record department and told them what I had learned and demanded to see the records that should be public property in a tax supported public institution. The girl looked worried and went into the inner office and called someone on the phone. When she came back she said that the smallpox report was not available as it was being worked on. So there we have the answer.

Whenever we see a statement about smallpox being wiped out by vaccination, we can be quite sure that the cases have been concealed in the "closed" contagion ward and the records have been worked on. Other investigations have shown that in this official scrambling of figures, the mild cases of smallpox are placed on the list of such diseases as chickenpox and measles, while the serious cases are recorded as syphilis, scrofula or something else

George Bernard Shaw said, "During the last considerable epidemic at the turn of the century, I was a member of the Health Committee of London Borough Council, and I learned how the credit of vaccination is kept up statistically by diagnosing all the re-vaccinated cases (of smallpox) as pustular eczema, varioloid or what not — except smallpox."

POST-WAR GERMANY REVEALS TRUTH ABOUT VACCINATION

In the American Sector of Occupied Germany, when the American medico-drug combine moved in for a sweeping vaccination campaign, the Germans begged to be spared, on the ground that they no longer had the hospitals, help, medicines or equipment that would be required to take care of the outbreak of disease that would and had always followed vaccination campaigns. Germany had been under compulsory vaccination in previous years and her doctors had made lush profits from the crop of diseases induced by each vaccination drive. When it was seen that the profits were to be made by the foreign invaders (America), they admitted the uselessness of the practice, as well as the physical and financial disadvantages to their people.

WHAT DOES VACCINATION DO TO THE BODY?

"Citing an admission by Sir James Paget that vaccination probably effects a permanent change in the components of the body, he inquires whether it is likely that the constitution can be altered in relation to one invading agent (like vaccine serum from diseased animal tissue or pus or from drugs) and remain unchanged in regard to all other invading agents. There is every reason . . . to believe the contrary, and to think that a system which has taken up a morbific principle, even though it should acquire thereby, immunity from cognate disease, must have its power of resistance to perturbing influences in general, diminished.

Mr. Spencer (Herbert) finds evidence of this general relative debility in the greatly increased severity and enlarged incidence of many diseases such as measles, chickenpox, and influenza, which, before vaccination became general, were of relatively rare occurrence and trifling in their effect. By a comparison of the infant mortality returns in quinquennial (five year) periods before and since compulsory vaccination, he finds that ‘the mortality from 8 specified diseases, either directly communicable or exacerbated (aggravated) by vaccination, increased from 20,524 to 41,353 per million births per annum." (From — Vaccination a Disastrous Delusion, by McCormick - page 13.)

VACCINE CANNOT BE MADE SAFE

The backbone of the vaccine argument is that it has been made safe —modified — by passing the virus through a cow and later all the harmful organisms are supposed to have been killed in the processing and glycerinizing, except a few select ones that are earmarked to produce the anti-bodies in the human organism.

The absurdity of this is too apparent for any serious argument. (See chapter on HOW SERUMS ARE MADE — Book II) It has been scientifically proved and tested that what is promised for vaccine virus is not so. Dr. Cameron, summed this up in his report before the Lyons Commission when he stated:

"THE CHARACTER OF THE VIRUS CANNOT BE CHANGED BY PASSING IT THROUGH THE COW, ANYMORE THAN BY STUNTING AN OAK IT CAN BE CONVERTED INTO A GOOSEBERRY BUSH."

If the vaccine virus had been modified or made safe by passing it through the body of an animal and then processing it, there would not be the ever-increasing list of deaths and disasters from vaccination. A few of the many examples of this will be given in the following pages of this chapter. Most of the cases are selected from the Rowton survey of Denver and Colorado Springs, Colorado. (The addresses are omitted, but on file.)

CASE HISTORIES

HEART TROUBLE FROM VACCINATION

Earl Richardson, (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated by the local doctor when six years of age. Up to that time he was strong and healthy, but 9 days after the vaccination he developed an illness accompanied by extreme nervousness that the doctor diagnosed as St. Vitus Dance. He was given an examination and found the heart and other organs to be sound and unaffected. A few days later complications set in and the doctor was called again. On examination he found that the boy had developed a valvular heart condition. The mother took him to Kentucky to three heart specialists who all declared that it was due to infection. One doctor said the ailment was probably due to vaccination, as he had seen some other cases of valvular heart trouble develop after vaccination. Four years later, when Mr. Rowton had his last interview with this family, the child was still too ill to attend school. His mother said he often had to sleep sitting up in bed on account of the heart condition.

It’s a strange law that compels children to be vaccinated in order to attend school and then disables them so they cannot attend — anything.

According to NEWSWEEK, April 25, 1955, heart trouble, our number one killer, takes 794,000 victims each year and 10 million Americans suffer from it.

Less than a third of the deaths were caused by heart trouble 20 years ago.   "Today, it causes more than one death out of every two.

"The cost is staggering: Industry loses the work of 653,000 men annually because of heart disease disabilities; annual compensation and pensions to veterans total $168,000,000."

Many of these same industries that are pressed with heavy disability costs are the ones that require compulsory vaccination of their employees.

The heart is the strongest muscle in the body and it takes an extreme amount of poison or abuse to impair its functioning. Tobacco, liquor, drugs, cola drinks, poison preservatives in foods and poison spray on farm produce, in addition to the incompatible, devitalized foods are some of the other poisons that corrode the tissues of the heart as well as every cell in the body. Arteriosclerosis, which accompanies about half of the heart deaths, is also a disease which is induced by body poisoning, over-eating of incompatible, devitalized foods and depleting habits.

TUBERCULOSIS FROM VACCINATION

Lena Long, (Denver) was vaccinated in October, 1922, in order to attend school. In four days her arm began to fester and she developed a high fever. She was extremely nervous and confined to her bed for about a week. A little later she developed pneumonia with symptoms of tuberculosis. The doctor checked the family records to try to find tuberculosis in the family or ancestory but none was found. The last report from the mother, Mrs. S. A. Long, was that Lena was still unable to attend school and was suffering from tuberculosis. Mr. Long (Lena’s father) was vaccinated the same year, in December, after which 12 boils developed on his neck. This gave him a great deal of trouble. He had never bad a boil before that time.

SCARLET FEVER FROM VACCINATION

Mrs. Donnelly, (Denver) was successfully vaccinated for smallpox on December 21, 1922. A few hours after the injection she began to experience severe reactions which developed into scarlet fever in such a serious form that she was rushed to the hospital where she hovered between life and death for several weeks.

KIDNEY TROUBLE FROM VACCINATION

Katie Blessant, (Denver) was given toxin-anti-toxin for diphtheria. In a short time she lost her voice and soon after that she developed kidney trouble and stomach trouble which she had never been bothered with before.

BRIGHT’S DISEASE FROM VACCINATION

Earl Rohsbecker, (Denver) was vaccinated for smallpox after which he developed Bright’s disease (an advanced form of degeneration of the kidneys). The doctors do not hold out much hope for his recovery.

PARALYSIS FROM VACCINATION

Raymond Nelson (Denver) was given diphtheria toxin-anti-toxin after which he developed paralysis. His son was given the antitoxin also, and died of it.

Mrs. Black (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated for smallpox and soon developed spinal meningitis. The case was so severe that the attending physician had to call in assistance from Denver.

VACCINE POISONING

David, son of Mr. and Mrs. C. Robinson, was vaccinated on November 6, 1921. By the family physician, in compliance with the school requirement. After three days his arm festered and was inflamed. Then for several weeks the vaccination seemed to be healing but continued to be sore and inflamed. In February the glands in his neck began to swell and some lumps formed under each arm. Some of the lumps decreased in size but all were painful so the doctor lanced one of the larger ones. It never did heal properly and began to discharge pus a little later. At the time of the last report (March, 1921) it had not healed and the child was still in bed and unable to walk. It is not likely that he will be able to attend school for a long time.

A Mother’s Report — (name withheld by request)

"I had my daughter vaccinated on the 21st of December, 1921. In less than a week her arm started to swell, become inflamed, and discharged pus at the site of the vaccination. A lump developed under the arm and she was seriously ill for four months. I had her treated for over a year with X-ray and now her arm is blistered with X-ray burns in addition to the original ailment.

SMALLPOX FROM VACCINATION

Mrs. Jessie Wuns (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated for smallpox and a few days later she developed a severe case of smallpox which lasted seven weeks.

DROPSY FROM VACCINATION

Mrs. Anna Heller (Colorado Springs) developed sores on her arm, neck and leg after her vaccination. Although many years have passed, it still bothers her.

Her two daughters were also vaccinated and both of them developed vaccinia and almost died from it. Her son, almost died from the vaccination itself; then he developed smallpox 30 days later. It left him with dropsy from which he has never recovered.

WHO CAN ANSWER THIS?

George Ogden and family reported the following:

"We all had smallpox before coming to Colorado Springs but Dr. Gillett insists on our being vaccinated every year anyway."

QUESTION: If a case of smallpox cannot immunize against another attack of smallpox how can a vaccination be expected to do more than that when the vaccination, at best, is claimed to produce only a mild form of the disease. Now, if there is anything at all to the vaccination theory then a case of smallpox should not only immunize against smallpox but should, also, protect against the effects of vaccination and re-vaccination. If it does not do this then the vaccination theory disproves itself — it has absolutely no sound reason for being. Since vaccination has proved itself to be useless and hazardous why does Dr. Gillett (as well as other vaccinating doctors) insist on vaccinating? Is there any reason except for money, at the cost of human life?

INSANITY FROM VACCINATION

NEWSWEEK for April 25, 1955 says that Mental Illness is rated by many experts as the biggest health problem of the day. More than half of the U. S. hospital beds are occupied by mental patients. Their care costs the taxpayers more than a billion dollars a year. Another report states that there are 10,000,000 people in U. S. with mental diseases.

On a troopship returning from the Australian sector after the war, it was reported that 250 of the 400 men aboard, were insane. Some of the excuses the doctors offered for this shocking development was that it was caused by the heat of the jungles and the rigors of war. However, the citizens of unvaccinated Australia didn’t go insane in the same heat and the enemy didn’t go insane with the same rigors of war and in the same climate. It has been hinted that the men were poisoned almost to death with vaccine serums and drugs. The normal brain cells are richly supplied with calcium and other alkaline elements When poisons are introduced into the system the calcium is leeched out of the soft tissues first and then the bones, in order to neutralize the poisons. This greatly impairs or destroys the functioning of the brain, nerves, muscles, and eyes, etc.

S Vandecarr, D C, m an article titled, "WHO IS INSANE" said:

"There is a cry being raised concerning the lack of sufficient institutions to adequately care for the mental cases needing commitment to them. Lunacy is terribly on the increase. Particularly do ex-service men and women need such care. Many thousands of these men and women were in perfect health when inducted into the armed forces. They were then given all the "shots" devised by the allopathic laboratories and used without question by the allopathic physicians in the medical corps. Histories of hundreds of cases were "written up" by physicians who followed up the results of immunization in the service. It showed plainly that the inoculations and vaccinations were responsible for the tremendous number of men and women who, soon after being inoculated, had to be discharged as psycho-neurotics. Thousands of these are now filling the mental institutions and few of them will ever again be restored to normal.

"One of the effects of the poisons injected into the blood to "prevent" (?) disease is that it weakens the nervous system and gradually breaks down the nerve centers in the brain. The end result of this is insanity...

"Within a day or so after being admitted to the mental institution, the patient is taken to the room set aside for the purpose and given three or more "shots." It matters not whether they have been recently vaccinated or not, they are again given a smallpox vaccination, then whatever serums they happen to have on hand. Thereafter, each week the patients are lined up and given more shots. What for? Who knows? Even those who give them do not apparently know. In one mental institution I know of, every Thursday is called "needle day" because on that day all patients are given at least three injections. They all get the same dose whether they want it or not. The result is, they lose weight and become sick. Their mental condition becomes worse with each inoculation and soon they are beyond help. Mild cases become violent and then the attendants maltreat them.

"After seeing the medical practitioners at work it makes one wonder whether it is the patient or the doctor who is insane.

CHAPTER 8: DEATHS FROM VACCINATION

"Knowledge is the antidote of fear,
Knowledge, Use and Reason, with its aids."
                                                                    —Emerson

Ignorance spiked with greed has put a death machine (vaccination) into the hands of doctors, and ignorance and fear have driven people into its lethal power. Emerson was right when he said that the right use of reason and knowledge could free mankind from fear. It is certainly true that a little knowledge applied in the right places would wake people out of their hypnotic stupor of believing that the popularized poison could unpoison them and make them well again.

It is the purpose of this chapter, in particular, as well as the entire book, to present the actual photographs and case histories of victims of vaccination, along with enough authoritative data to give some concrete reasons for abolishing vaccination. Its deadly effects have been proved and its uselessness has been admitted by the most experienced authorities in the field.

According to the figures of the Office of Vital Statistics at Washington, D. C., there were "33 deaths from vaccination in the three years, 1949, 1950, 1951…..

Post-Vaccinal Encephalitis 22; Generalized Vaccinia, 2; other complications, 9." During this same 3-year period there were only 4 deaths from smallpox. If vaccination kills people at the rate of 33 to every 4 protected (?) the risk is greater than any possible advantage. (It was not stated how many of the smallpox cases had been vaccinated also.)

In the years 1941 to 1948 there were (In U.S.) 107 deaths from "sequaelae of preventive immunization, inoculation or vaccination". During this time there were only 78 deaths from smallpox.

In the American Journal of Diseases of Children, Dr. Greenberg discussed the results of the 1947 smallpox scare in New York. Under the heading of Complications of Vaccination" he admitted that 45 cases of post vaccinal encephalitis (inflammation of the brain and spinal cord) had been observed and that 4 deaths had occurred up to that time. Two of the patients who survived death developed hemiparesis and one had optic neuritis. Forty-two other patients had generalized vaccinia of which two died and another died of ulceration of the vaccination.

So, seven died of this vaccination epidemic while only one died of smallpox and that case was proved, later, not to be smallpox at all. It was just a case of poison ivy used to stage a multi-million dollar vaccination drive.

In England the Ministry of Health’s report on The State of the Public Health During Six Years of War," under the heading "Post-Vaccinal Encephalitis" stated:

"In the six years 60 cases of this complication of vaccinia have been recorded by the Ministry. There were 31 deaths; a figure of 50 percent, may be taken as the fatality rate of this grave complication."

During this same period of six years there were only 13 deaths from smallpox in all of England and Wales. The report did not state how many of these cases of smallpox were induced by vaccination.

Neville Chamberlain M.D. was forced to admit, in the House of Commons, that in the short period of one month (June 1 to June 30) 11 death certificates had been given in which the words "vaccination" or "vaccinia" appeared as the cause of death, and that on six of these certificates some form of nervous disease was entered. . . He also admitted that there were 10 other cases in which death followed closely after vaccination.

An editorial in JOHN BULL (London) continues this discussion as follows:

"Almost the next day he (Chamberlain) had to admit that one child in Norfolk died of post-vaccinal-encephalitis (sleeping sickness) after vaccination and that three other similar cases in the same district were suffering from the same disease following vaccination.

"We do not have to be medical experts to appreciate the gravity of this startling report, which for once in a lifetime has completely broken through the conspiracy of silence with which medical men usually surround their operations.

"This is not particularly a question of medicine. It is a question of national health-SURVIVAL. It is not sanity to continue to inject poison and disease into healthy children, and we have no hesitation whatever in asserting that the whole

business of vaccination should be suspended forthwith.

"Our opinion is that it would be both cheaper and more affective to remove vaccination than to waste time and money in experiments toward removal of the dread consequences of vaccination."

ENCYCLOPEDIA REPORTS DISEASES CAUSED BY VACCINATION

The Encyclopedia Britannica (9th edition) records results of a canvass of cities after a general vaccination order for school children. It was found that nearly all the cases of scarlet fever, measles and diphtheria had been recently vaccinated. Two vaccinated boys developed black diphtheria and died. What is true of this survey is true of other cities where vaccination is stressed.

WHAT VACCINATION DOES

A recognized authority summed up this subject by saying:

"Vaccination induces an acute and specific disease (resembling smallpox) and also aggravates existent latent diseases. The absorption of the vaccine virus into the circulation excites the virus already in the system, and nature rebels, as it were, and makes an effort to throw the poison out of the body. When there is sufficient vitality, it will be successful. But when there is a lack of vitality, or a low state of health, there is little or no external manifestation in the shape of blisters, pustules, or eruptions. In this case, the poison sinks in, or is absorbed, and remains in the body, and later develops into some organic disease, generally of the respiratory organs.

"Nearly all of those on whom Jenner performed his earlier experiments, including his own son, died of consumption (a disease of the respiratory organs).

"There are possibly millions, both children and adults, who are compelled to endure a living death from the effects of vaccination, in the form of syphilis, scrofula, cancer, tumors, skin diseases, etc."

I personally have seen a number of people lingering on for years in a state of living death as a result of vaccination.

FIVE HUNDRED KILLED BY VACCINATION IN FIVE MONTHS IN U. S.

In his "Vaccination Delusions", Thomas Morgan reports:

"During the past five months, we have collected from the newspapers over five hundred authenticated cases of injury and death from vaccination. We present a few cases to show how vaccination protects (?) for it is evident that when vaccination kills the patient, he is forever immune to smallpox, protected by the immunizing potency of death. These have died from blood-poisoning, erysipelas, lockjaw, convulsions, etc., after vaccination." (The names, ages, dates, and locality (town) are given on page 35 of "Medical Delusions.")

THE NEW YORK SUN, March 20, 1895 stated:

"John Morrissey, 1979 Third Ave., New York, lost his two children; both died from convulsions induced by vaccination. Dr. Sharp, who attended them, thinks that vaccination may have been the cause of the children’s death.

HERALD, Northampton, Mass., May 25, 1895:

"Webster N. Kinney, 8 year old son of Charles Kinney, of Westfield, was vaccinated and died from the direct effect of vaccination, which resulted in blood-poisoning. The occurrence caused quite a stir. Parents see that there is greater danger from poisoning the human system with vaccine virus than from smallpox." (emphasis supplied)

PRESS SPECIAL, Savannah, Georgia, Febr. 3, 1898:

"Wm. M. Lee, member of the St. Louis School Board, died from vaccination.

Alma Olivia Piehn, daughter of L. H. Piehn, president of the Anti-Vaccination Society of America, died May 13, 1894, killed by compulsory vaccination. Albert F. Turner died from blood-poisoning, as the result of vaccination."

THE BOSTON HERALD gives names and addresses of 47 soldiers killed by vaccination in just one month of army life, from the official reports from Camp Merrit, San Francisco, Camp Muintauk and troops stationed at Manila for the month of January, 1899. These soldiers had the usual course of vaccine serums for the prevention of smallpox, diphtheria, typhoid, etc.

The diseases they died from within 30 days of the vaccinations were, smallpox, diphtheria, typhoid, lockjaw, black smallpox, blood-poisoning, and cirrhosis of the liver.

General Leonard Wood told the Senate Committee on Military Affairs that "half his present forces were not fit for effective service." (After vaccination.)

In the Cuban army 60 per cent of the men were frequently disabled, because of diseases other than battle wounds.

SOLDIERS DISABLED AND KILLED BY VACCINATION

In a published article in LIFE magazine, April 17, 1950, General Eisenhower, in discussing the poor conditioning of our fighting forces, said:

I remember one time in Africa when we had only four divisions in the field, and I was desperate for men, I found we had 6,000 men in hospitals in Africa unavailable for combat — and not one of them had suffered a wound."

All these men were in prime condition when they went to war. Forty-seven per cent of our young men were unfit for service and were rejected. This was an "all time high" record of unfitness, indicating the decadent trend of our nation’s health. But the most perfect men were inducted and sent to the Army camps to be shot full of vaccine poisons and other drugs. After this drastic course of malpractice thousands of boys were invalided home as physical and mental wrecks before they even left American soil. Others were sent to the battlefield where they collapsed and had to be hospitalized.

During the Second World War I heard that seven men had dropped dead on the floor of the vaccinator’s office at Birmingham after being vaccinated. I wrote to the government for verification and learned from the printed official government statement that in just the first six months of the war, there were not just seven vaccination deaths, but there were 62 deaths from yellow fever vaccine alone. The men received from 14 to 24 vaccinations of all varieties but the full report of all vaccination deaths was not given. The casualties were probably tabulated under other causes. The report of the US Secretary of War, Henry L. Simpson regarding the deaths from yellow fever "shots" reads in part:

"RECENT ARMY EXPERIENCE WITH YELLOW FEVER VACCINE RESULTED IN 28,505 CASES OF HEPATITIS (disease of the liver) WITH 62 deaths, as of July 24, 1942."

The British Army finally abandoned compulsory vaccination when the numerous law suits for deaths and damages made it mandatory.

On February 5, 1954, Mr. Birch, Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Defense, assured Mr. Charles R. Hobson, M. P. that the British troops retain their right to refuse vaccination and all inoculations, even when fighting under United Nations Command.

England was the country that introduced compulsory vaccination and being a proud and somewhat self-righteous nation, she did everything possible to make vaccination work so she would not have to admit her guilt in this respect. But with all the subterfuge, artful persuasion and coercion, vaccination was at last admitted to be a failure and a calamity. Since the vaccination law was repealed the health of that country has been steadily improving. In view of these unrefutable facts, it is not compatible with our standards of justice and democratic ideals for our U. S. government to lend itself to the uses of the medical and drug trusts in their money-making vaccination schemes.

Dr. Herbert Snow, for 25 years staff surgeon of the London Cancer Hospital stated:

"Of recent years, many men and women in prime of life, have dropped dead suddenly. I am convinced that some 80 per cent of these deaths are caused by the inoculations or vaccinations they have earlier undergone. These are well known to cause grave and permanent disease of the heart.

"The coroner always hushes it up as ‘natural causes’. I have been trying to get these cases referred to an Independent Commission of inquiry, but so far, in vain."

So far the investigations have been thwarted by committees staffed or influenced by medical men who were there to promote their own interests. Is our nation to continue on the decline until it passes into oblivion like some of the earlier nations that invited corruption for private gain. If we want to reverse the present trend we may have to take drastic action to dislodge the decadent medical system from public domination and outlaw the use and sale of poison drugs that are at present parading under the name of healing agents.

PHOTOGRAPHS OF VICTIMS OF VACCINATION

These are just a few of the hundreds of cases of blindness, paralysis, cancer, ulcers and other diseases of vaccination that resulted in death. Most of these photographs were collected by Anti-Vaccination League of England and America and published in VACCINATION AT WORK and other books on the subject of vaccination.

Mona Stevenson of Humphrey St. Burnley, England, was vaccinated at the age of five weeks by Dr. J. W. Clegg, with the official glycerinated calf-lymph, after five weeks of suffering in which the child’s face and arm was partly eaten away by the vaccine disease, the child died. The same doctor certified the cause of death as "generalized vaccinia, 36 days, and exhaustion."

 LOCKJAW CAUSED BY VACCINATION.

Willie Hood, six year old son of J.G. Hood, 4150 Lafayette Ave., St. Louis, Mo. died of lockjaw following vaccination on Oct. 14, 1917. (Details given in the Vaccination Inquirer, Nov. 1, 1917) Charles Higgens, of New York, shows photographs of five other fatal cases of post-vaccinal lock-jaw in his well documented book "The Horrors of Vaccination. (Pub. 1920) Records of 30 other fatal cases of this disease in New York, were published by Mr. James A. Loyster, of New York, whose son died of infantile paralysis (cerebral) as a result of vaccination. (The account of this case is given on page 33 of VACCINATION AT WORK, published by the National Anti-Vaccination-League.

 LOATHSOME DISEASE GENERATED BY VACCINATION

Ethel Mary Thompson, age seven months, (from Skene Row, Aberdeen) was a beautiful, healthy infant until vaccinated. Soon after this operation ulcers began to develop that never healed. Six weeks later when the doctor was called, he observed that "there was a great punched-out" hole right through the arm near the vaccination and another gaping wound in the arm pit. The flesh in this area had decayed until the ribs were exposed. On the abdomen was a large brown patch of decaying flesh and the knee was swollen out of proportion to its normal size. Festering sores were forming on the toes. After two months of untold suffering the child died.

 VACCINAL-SYPHILIS

"Ernest Cheeseman of Rose Cottages, Wescott, Dorking, England was vaccinated at the age of nine weeks with the standard glycerinated calf-lymph supplied by the local Government Board on Nov. 3rd. Up to that time he was healthy and normal and his parents were in good health. Five days after his vaccination a serious form of syphilitic skin disease develloped and death relieved him of his suffering on Nov. 30th. The body was covered with eczema-like eruptions and the feet were drawn up, all out of shape. The sores that broke out around the mouth looked like burnt meat and stood out at least half an inch." (From Vaccination at Work) When syphilis results from vaccination, it is the usual claim of the doctors, that the mother must surely have syphilis and certainly communicated it to the child. In Wales when 4,000 infants were found to be syphilitic after their vaccinations, all the parents were examined by the doctors in an effort to lay the blame on them, but the parents were found to be free from syphilis. In the case of the Cheeseman baby, the same cowardly accusations were made against the mother, by the doctors. She willingly underwent a medical examination and it was found that she was normal and healthy, with no syphilitic taint. The examiner stated: "I do not think there is any reason whatever to suspect that she has ever suffered from syphilis. I find no indication of such disease." Some of the doctors at the inquest persisted in their morbid character defamation charges against the mother and refused to believe the medical report that gave her a clean bill of health. On the strength of their own opinions they insisted that she was syphilitic and would not be able to give birth to another normal baby. To prove that the accusations of the doctors were unjustified she had the following photograph taken after the birth of her next child, Frederick John, who was 10 weeks old at the time his was taken. It is apparent that the child is well and healthy—and unvaccinated. The fathers (in England) who refused to have their children serve prison terms under compulsory vaccination but many of them accepted this punishment in order to save their children from the deadly effects of vaccination.

Rita and Eberhard Kandlbinder, died on June, 1951, as a result of vaccination. The Munchner Illustrierte, June 28, 1951, reported the "mysterious death of six infants after smallpox vaccinations." After the photographs and story of these deaths occurred many other parents came forth with similar stories, although the doctors had named some other cause for the deaths. Most of the vaccination deaths are unknown because they are unreported as such (see the chapter on Falsified Death Certificates, Book II).

BLINDNESS FROM VACCINATION

"Horace Capewell of 5 Court St., Southbridge, England, was a fine healthy baby with beautiful eyes. He was vaccinated when five weeks old. Nine days later his body was a mass of sores. His eyes became affected and at the age of five months he was totally blind Many doctors at Birmingham had the case under treatment but nothing could restore his sight This was taken many years later at the age of 20 years.

Photostat of death certificate of victim of vaccination.

There is no doctor or test that can predict whether or not vaccination will bring death, disability or the potentialities of future disease. Is the risk worth the dubious promise of immunity?

INFLAMATION OF THE BRAIN FROM VACCINATION

These beautiful, healthy twins, Peter and Portia Furness, aged 4½ years died two weeks after being vaccinated with certified government vaccine The deaths took place May, 1931 at South Wigston, near Leicester, England. This is one of the few cases in which the doctors admitted the real cause of death on the death certificate as being post-vaccinal encephalitis.

VACCINATION TRAGEDY

Margaret Ann, the only daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Donald W. Gooding, of Wolsey, Essex, England, was pronounced a perfect baby by the doctor when she was born. This beautiful and healthy infant was vaccinated at the age of 4 months. The first two injections didn’t take so a third vaccination was given, after which inflammation of the brain developed within 5 days. She was taken to the hospital where she remained for many weeks. At the age of 13 months she was blind and could not learn to walk. She also developed digestive disturbances and convulsions. This tragic case was brought to the attention of the House of Commons in the hope that an investigation would be made of the hazards of vaccination and others would be warned of the danger. Mr. Bevan was shown the possibility of other similar results if the same practice was continued and he was asked if he would make the result of his inquiry fully available to the House of Commons and the public.

If he ever made an honest investigation it would result in an unqualified condemnation of vaccination. This he did not do so far as I have been able to find out.

BLINDNESS FROM VACCINATION

This child was a healthy, normal child at birth. When she was a year and a half old she was vaccinated, after which her eyes began to exude matter and within a week they closed and she has been blind ever since. Dr. Blasson, Dr. Kynaston and the famous specialist, Dr. Bell Taylor, all examined the child and acknowledged that the blindness was due to vaccination. Because the father defied the vaccination law and refused to have his other child vaccinated he was to be prosecuted. He carried his blind child into the court room and showed her eyes and her arm which was enlarged, deformed and sore from the shoulder to the finger tips. The evidence and the public sentiment against the vaccination law influenced the magistrates to exempt the father from having his other child vaccinated.

INFANTILE PARALYSIS FROM VACCINATION

John James MacDonald was well and normal when vaccinated. After a time his vaccinated arm withered and drew up until it was useless. Then his right leg became emaciated and so drawn up that he could no longer walk. The vaccination refused to heal and in addition to that, a festering sore developed on his foot.

WRITER PARALYZED BY VACCINATION

Job West of Bradford-On-Avon was vaccinated as a boy and partially paralyzed soon after the injection. For many years he lost the power of voluntary movement of the lower limbs. In spite of his handicap and suffering he became a renowned "student and authority on the vaccination question, and a most prolific writer on the subject."

SLOW DEATH THROUGH VACCINATION

Elsie Thuroff was born March 3, 1920 and vaccinated June 8, 1921. In August of the same year she began suffering from "violent grinding pains, and swelling and distortion of the bones of her arm up to her shoulder. The medical diagnosis was tuberculosis of the bones. She underwent an operation after which the condition grew steadily worse until her arm drew up and became helpless.  The skin of the face burned away. The vaccination marks suppurated and the body wasted away to a living skeleton.  "After suffering excruciating pain she died on the 8th of January, 1923."

DOCTORS WARNED NOT TO VACCINATE ECZEMA CASES

This six year old boy died of generalized vaccinia. He had been subject to eczema since the age of six weeks. Since eczema is a condition of extreme toxemia (acidosis or internal poisoning) the poison from the vaccine serum intensified the body poisoning and he died September 1949.

In March 1953, Dr. George Taylor of Bradford vaccinated his five-months’ old daughter who was suffering from a mild case of eczema and the baby died nine days later of generalized vaccinia and eczema. The doctors are beginning to see the seriousness of poisoning the already poisoned sick with more poison in the form of vaccine serums.

USELESS ARM FROM VACCINE POISONING

William Hamilton was vaccinated at three months of age. The poison spread and the sores never healed. The case was attended by six doctors but they gave it up as a hopeless case. His arm has been useless since the vaccination in infancy, The photo was taken when he was 15 years of age.

VACCINATION CAUSES MISCARRIAGE

A careful check showed that "47 per cent of women who had been vaccinated in the second or third month of pregnancy, failed to give birth to a normal child." (p. 47, "Vaccination at Work)"

The Consulting Pediatrician of Lanarkshire County Council in an article in The Lancet (London) December 6, 1952 reported one of the typical cases of this survey. This woman was about three months pregnant when she was vaccinated for smallpox. The report states: "She developed a severe primary reaction and three months later she was spontaneously delivered of a feeble hydropic premature infant covered with a very severe generalized vaccinia. The child died 18 hours after birth."

Many of the new strange diseases of modern times can be traced to vaccination or medication of the child or the mother.

VACCINATION DEATHS NOT REPORTED

Because some of the photographs of cases shown in the preceding pages have been collected from other countries as well as United States and some of the deaths occurred a number of years ago, some may wonder if vaccination deaths are so rare that these must be used. Although photographs are not often made of vaccination victims there are, nevertheless, an unbelievable number of such cases that are hushed up and the death certificate often gives some other cause. The medically staffed health departments rarely make inquiry regarding these cases and, unfortunately, there are very few courageous and public spirited people or organizations who are willing to spend the time and money to make such an investigation. However, just to show how much can be uncovered with a little effort I am presenting a partial list of the vaccination deaths that were traced down by just one man, V. E. Rowton, in just one year, 1921, in just one medium-sized city, Denver, Colorado. A local "Optional Vaccination League" helped to find other cases. Most of these tragedies were reported by members of the families or other eye-witnesses to the crimes.

VACCINATION DEATHS IN COLORADO.

(From the files of Mr. V. E. Rowton)

"My wife, Ethel Andrews, was in good health until she was vaccinated by Dr.------ , about November 1, 1922. The vaccination started "to take" in three days — began to fester and the arm was swollen. About the 9th of November, she broke out with a pronounced skin rash all over her body. On November 29, she became seriously ill. Sores appeared in place of the rash and the doctor said it was smallpox. On December 5th, she died."

"My daughter, Ruth Yvonne, six years old, was in perfect health until Saturday, December 3, 1921, when we were advised by our family physician, Dr. C. F. Henger, to have her vaccinated, which we did. . . About the third day her arm began to hurt but she continued to attend school until Friday. On Saturday she complained of a sore throat. She became sick at her stomach and vomited. Her condition grew worse. The doctors could do nothing to save her and she died on Tuesday about 5:15 (1921)."

Mrs. H. P. Kingsley, of the Ellsworth Hotel, Denver, gave the following statement about her son John:

"He was in perfect health when I took him to school on Monday. He was told he must be vaccinated before he could enter school so I had him vaccinated on the following Monday. His knee started hurting soon after the vaccination but he went to school the next morning. That was the last day he was ever to go to school again. The pain went to every joint in his body and he suffered intensely for three weeks; then he passed away."

This data about the death of Mrs. Alta Vincent, 18 years of age, was given by her husband, Luther Vincent, (Denver.)

"About November 13, 1922, my wife submitted to vaccination in order to hold her position with the telephone company. Up to the time of the vaccination she was in good health. On December 8th, she became quite ill with enlarged lymphatic glands under her arms. On the 10th she died."

"My wife was vaccinated by Dr. A. W. Calhoun of Denver, on October 27, 1922. At the time of the vaccination she was not in very good health. She died a few hours after the vaccination in our home. The doctor pronounced it heart failure."

(This report was given by her husband, Mr. Padgett)

Walter Call was vaccinated about November 20, 1922. He was able to work for a week after being vaccinated although he was ill during the time. He died on December 8, 1922 with black smallpox.

Lafayette Hunt of Denver, Colorado, was vaccinated November 6, 1922. He developed smallpox on November 18th and died of it November 28, 1922.

Hulda Berg of Denver was vaccinated for smallpox some years ago. On October 27, 1922, she became ill with a severe headache and a rash. Dr. Kesley thought it was measles. The health officer was called the following Sunday. He pronounced it smallpox and she was taken to the hospital where she died soon after.

Ada McDaniels (Denver) was vaccinated twice shortly before she was stricken with smallpox. She died on November 25, 1922.

Mr. Louis Pleines (Denver) was vaccinated when a boy and again six weeks before he came down with smallpox, He died of smallpox on February 5, 1923.

Mrs. E. P. Haddon (Denver) was in good health until Sunday, November 12, 1922, when she was vaccinated by her family physician, and nearly collapsed at the time. The next day, Monday, she was ill. She was worse on Tuesday so the doctor turned the case over to the health officer. She was quarantined for smallpox on Wednesday and died the following Monday, November 20th.

The street addresses of these cases are on file but have been omitted for obvious reasons.

Mr. and Mrs. Alvord of South Cascade, had a healthy, robust child. It was vaccinated by Dr. Peters. About 9 days later it began to have convulsions. The doctor was called and treated it. He said he was especially interested because it was a vaccinated case. The convulsions occurred after the doctor left and he was called again but the child died before he arrived. After a post mortem by Doctors Peters and Gillett, the cause of death was reported as colitis. No mention was made of the recent vaccination.

Miss Hamilton, a school teacher, became seriously ill two weeks after her vaccination. Smallpox pustules broke out over her back in the region of the kidneys. She died soon after. The doctor reported the cause to be acute dilation of the heart. (This condition does not happen without a cause. The blood-poisoning effect of the vaccination wasn’t mentioned.)

Another school teacher of Colorado Springs (name withheld) submitted to vaccination in March in order to hold her position. She was never well after that and died on November 17, 1922.

Mr. Charles Kiner, of Colorado Springs, gave the following report:

"In the fall of 1922 we started our only child, a little girl, to school. She was in excellent health at the time but after she had attended two months we were told that she must be vaccinated or leave school. We were opposed to it but had to submit. Soon after she was vaccinated she broke out with sores and was not able to attend school again for six weeks. She started again but was too sick to continue. We called our family physician, Dr. Gillett, and he said she had erysipelas. She passed away about 9 days later."

Mrs. Caldwell (Colorado Springs) was vaccinated and nearly lost her arm as a result of the long-continued inflammation. Eight months later she had smallpox in spite of the vaccination. (Or because of it)

"Our baby was vaccinated in the fall of 1921. Four days after the vaccination the arm became very sore and swollen; inflammation spread over the shoulder and up the neck to the back of her ear. It continued to get worse and on the sixth day the doctor said it was mastoiditis. The next day the baby went into convulsions and died on the 9th day after the vaccination." Reported by the mother — name withheld (Colorado Springs.)

Mrs. Ellen Cook (Denver) was vaccinated at the City Hall on November 15, 1922. "In five days", she reported, "I was very sick and couldn’t even lift my head for several days without vomiting. My arm was badly swollen and full of painful lumps from my shoulder to my elbow and was purple with congestion. It felt like there was a cord drawn from my breast to my arm which gave me intense pain. I was quite helpless for three weeks then it broke out in sores at three different times. A year and three months has passed and it is not well yet." (February 28, 1923)

As a result of the findings of this privately conducted survey of vaccination disasters, Mr. Rowton and his group feel they found enough evidence to prove that there is no benefit whatsoever, but considerable danger in the popular but damaging practices listed below:

SHOTS THAT CAN BE DEADLY

CHAPTER 9: MEDICAL INTERFERENCE

"Medical science is a form of delusional madness from which few medical men ever recover. Backed by commercialism, this madness runs roughshod over the life and health of the people."—Herbert M. Shelton, Ph.D., D.C., N.D.

In the Dark Ages when a decadent church dominated the state and religious persecution b e c a m e intolerable, the people rebelled and demanded separation of church and state. In countries where this popular request was not granted, those who wanted religious freedom fled to other countries where more liberty and justice were possible. The newly discovered America became a refuge for those who sought freedom from tyranny and subjection. The constitution, that the Founding Fathers drew up was originally intended to protect the people from encroachments on civil liberties and human rights, whether it be from the self-appointed dictators of powerful financial interests, or from political, religious or economic pressures.

Dr. Benjamin Rush and Dr. Josiah Bartlett (both congressmen and signers of the Declaration of Independence) foresaw the medical tyranny that was, even then, laying its groundwork for domination of the healing field. In an effort to block this threatening menace they tried to introduce legislative measures that would insure freedom from medical tyranny as well as the other freedoms necessary to democracy. Their efforts were thwarted, however, by the preponderance of orthodox medical men in congress at that time, whose personal interest stood m the way of public good. Some of these men even refused to sign the Declaration.

An excerpt from one of the valiant speeches of Dr. Rush is as follows:

"The Constitution of the Republic should make provision for medical freedom as well as for religious freedom. To restrict the art of healing to one class of men (such as medical doctors) and deny equal privileges to others (also trained in healing) will constitute the Bastile of medical science. All such laws are Un-American and despotic. They are fragments of monarchy and have no place in a Republic."

The failure of congress to establish freedom from medical domination has cost the nation countless billions of dollars and needless loss of life and health of our citizens.

The medical dictatorship has extended its tentacles, since that time, until it now has control over a much wider area than the church ever did. Not only is our Public Health Service completely manned by the narrow and limited ability of this one branch of business, but it also wields its dictatorial power over the schools, colleges, charities, churches, public libraries, press, radio, women’s clubs, P.T.A., life insurance companies and many industries and businesses, even the Civil Service, which of all things, should respect the Constitution in its law against trusts.

A PLANNED MEDICAL CONSPIRACY

This medical strangle hold did not just happen with the passing of time; it was a planned conspiracy against the American people, with an "eye" to the financial gains of the doctors. A sample of this strategy may be seen in the following speech of Dr. W. A. Evans, one of the top medical "bosses," and Health Commissioner for the city of Chicago, who gave these instructions to the doctors in their annual convention of the American Medical Association in 1911:

"The thing for the medical profession to do, is to get right into, and man every important health movement; man health departments, tuberculosis societies, housing societies, child care and infant societies, etc. The future of the profession depends on it. . . The profession cannot afford to have these places occupied by other than medical men."

This pronouncement was published in the journal of the A. M. A., September 16, 1911. Just how whole-heartedly this decree was carried out is clearly shown by how completely all the non-medical schools of healing such as chiropractic, naturopathic, religious science, hygienics, etc., have been excluded from such tax supported institutions as health boards, public hospitals, army camps, state prisons, workman’s compensation bureaus, asylums, etc.

Annie Riley Hale, in her MEDICAL VOODOO has this to say of the Dr. Evans resolutions:

That ‘the future of his profession depended’ on getting the whip-hand in Public Health Service, and that ‘the profession could not afford’ to forego the political advantage accruing from such monopoly will be interpreted by some as a virtual confession on the part of regular medicine that it either realized it had nothing of therapeutic value to offer the sick world, or that it had despaired of winning the sick patronage by fair means, and must therefore have recourse to political intrigue.

"However it may be interpreted, here we have recorded evidence of a deliberate plan by organized official medicine, openly declared in convention assembled, to monopolize a great public agency like the Public Health Service —affecting all the people and paid for by all the people — to the utter exclusion of other healing professions legalized under existing laws.

The effect of the adoption and vigorous prosecution of the Evans resolution has been to (1) enhance the political power of organized medicine under the official name of American Medical Association, and (2) to enable the medical trust to hamper, harass, and where possible, suppress their therapeutic rivals — in order to destroy competition. . . Destroying competition and crushing smaller businesses for monetary gain is precisely what the SHERMAN ANTI-TRUST LAW was designed to prevent. Thus, the A. M. A. in carrying out the Evans program has taken on all the offensive features and oppressive overlordism of a swollen commercial ‘trust’."

There may be some independent medical practitioners who do not belong to or support the A. M. A. and these would not be held accountable for the damage done by the "outlaw" practices of the "association."

CONTRACTS TO DEFRAUD THE PUBLIC

In the MEDICAL TRUST UNMASKED, the author tells of agreements and contracts between the medical societies and the insurance companies that are designed to defend the doctors against law suits brought against them for malpractice in which they kill or maim their patients. He tells that there are (or were when he wrote the book in 1935, perhaps more now) 70,000 doctors in 32 states who have knowingly entered into these agreements which are nothing short of deadly conspiracy against the life and welfare of the people. On page 64 he states:

"Twenty-eight of these thirty-two states grant this defense as part of the regular benefits derived from being a member of the American Medical Association. Membership alone is sufficient to insure the physician that he will be defended by the whole closely banded fraternity, should he ever be sued for malpractice."

A statement of peculiar significance is included in the following paragraph:

"Twenty-four of these medical societies furnish expert witnesses to testify on behalf of the accused (the doctor). Eighteen of these societies pay all expenses incurred by such witnesses, as well as special remuneration for testifying favorably, some of it running as high as $50.00 a day."

These "expert witnesses" may live 1,000 miles from the scene of the crime and know nothing about it except what they are paid to say. Is this any different from the methods of the professed criminals of the underworld?

The patients or survivors of a medical crime are given a full course of intimidation and threats by the doctors in order to discourage them from suing and most of them withdraw when they see the hopelessness of winning against the "fix".

In a confidential report submitted by the Board of Trustees of the American Medical Association to its electoral body at its Dallas convention in 1926, the doctors were assured that the A. M. A. was seeking means of preventing malpractice suits The report reads:

"It cannot be too strongly insisted that the prevention of claims is the object sought, and not merely the adjustment of such claims as arise, nor the indemnification of physicians against loss"

No provision for the welfare of the patient was made and no consideration for his rights was deemed of any importance.

REGARDING THE MEDICAL MONOPOLY

The YALE LAW JOURNAL, May, 1954 says:

"As a consequence of its monopoly position, financial resources, and political strength, organized medicine is able to maintain a quasi-legal status in medical societies to appoint or recommend members of regulatory bodies. A.M.A. standards in medical education, training, and practice are usually adopted by law. In addition, A. M. A. inspection to determine whether its own standards have been satisfied is seldom subject to judicial review. Thus the political authority of the state itself has in effect been delegated to organized medicine."

HOW THE HIGH PRESSURE MEDICAL LOBBYING INFLUENCES LEGISLATION

From the New York Times, June 15, 1952, we read:

"Some rather expert observations of the art of lobbying as practiced in Washington assert that the A. M. A. is the only organization in the country that could marshal 140 votes in Congress between sundown Friday night and noon on Monday. Performances of this sort have led some to describe the A. M. A. lobby as the most powerful in the country."

"In 1954 sixteen individuals and groups reported to Congress that they spend more than $50,000 each on their legislative interests. The biggest one of these groups admitted it had spent $547,000 on this matter of influencing legislation through their powerful lobbying groups." — from "World Predictions," 1955.

"The Tarnished Record of the American Medical Association" published by the Milwaukee Federated Trades Council states:

The A. M. A. at its 1949 convention voted to make the $25.00 assessment permanent. It further urged its members to engage in political action to defeat congressmen whom it could not control…..

"In the 26th Pennsylvania district, a group of doctors calling themselves the Healing Arts Committees mailed out more than 190,000 letters, made more than 120,000 personal telephone calls, placed a series of 12 advertisements in every newspaper and purchased radio time to urge the defeat of the local congressman who had supported a measure not favorable to them."

An excerpt from the speech of a congressman and recorded in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD says that the A. M. A. had "a record of almost unparalleled opposition to social and economic progress, blindness to need, and resistance to reform."

Many laws designed by and for the benefit of the A. M. A. have been "pressured through" without the vote or the approval or even the knowledge of people involved.

Just recently a high pressure opportunist group tried to force a measure through Congress whereby their competitors could be barred from the mails without notice and without a jury trial (it was defeated). That is even worse than the present law which allows the medical trust to bar their competitors from the mails on false charges and without a jury trial. But the victim is allowed a few days notice. This is an unfair law and should be adjusted.

The DEFENDER MAGAZINE, Wichita, Kansas (May 1955) under the heading HEALTH DICTATORSHIP, comments: "We are getting a ‘look-see’ as to how the American Medical Association pulls strings and controls policies of the government in-so-far as the Pure Food and Drug law is concerned."

Former Intelligence Officer of the United States Government, Major Robert H. Williams, in his Bulletin (April 27, 1955) states:

"Sane people are being arrested and held for mental observation without a trial, a thing I would hardly have believed had I not seen it happen. Bills are appearing in the state legislatures designed to impower the state to SEIZE ANY CITIZEN and legally hold him for observation or for compulsory treatment . …"

This is one of the Gestapo methods of eliminating honest competition. When these sane people are forced into the mental institutions they are given frequent injections with the "poisoned needle" and are soon rendered incapable of rational thinking or coherent speech. At this stage they are brought before the "Board" for questioning and, of course, declared to be insane and therefore confined permanently to the institution. A bullet in the back would be less cowardly than this.

WHO HAS THE MONOPOLY ON WORDS?

The word DOCTOR comes from the Greek term di-daktor, which means "one who imparts knowledge to others — a teacher." The Latins condensed it to "doc-to-ro" and it was later shortened to doctor. Medical doctors are not teachers. In fact part of their instructions at medical school is not to tell the patient much. They are not, as a rule, very well informed on the real cause and cure of disease so they could not teach it if they wanted to. A dictionary gives one definition of doctor as "a learned person." If either of these definitions were the criterion for issuing medical degrees it would eliminate about 99 per cent of the practitioners from the title of doctor. Yet, they have sought a monopoly on this word in-so-far as the healing field is concerned.

The word CURE has also been taken over by the medical trust as its private property and drugless doctors and writers have been barred from the mails and persecuted in other ways for teaching how nature cures or for using or speaking of a cure for some disease.

The latest encroachment on public rights is the medical monopoly on the word HEALTH. In some states they have made it a law that no drugless practitioner may use the word HEALTH on his advertising, signs or titles. The NATUROPATH magazine, January 1955 (published for Naturopathic doctors) reported this situation in the editorial, by Dr. T W. Schippell. Excerpts from this editorial are as follows:

" . . . Every day we see additional liberties of the independent practitioner trampled under foot — more non-conformist healers jailed or driven from the country.

"There has just come to hand a letter from an independent practitioner who has long been the head of a liberal school of healing in Chicago where he conducts a health regaining emporium .. He is finding out the hard way, that any outstanding success in the natural healing field brings with it, as a definite reaction, the unbridled wrath of medical men everywhere…..

"The established rule of medical fair play in this country seems to be: If you cannot beat a rival practitioner on the market place, you must unseat him through some ordinance or statute in the legislative halls. And that is what has happened in Chicago. Excerpts from the letter will show the sequence of events as they happened:

"‘Some months ago I was called into the State Department of Education and Registration and was warned by that august body that I could no longer use the word NATUROPATH on my letterheads, doors or windows.

"‘I was informed further that I must substitute the word Chiropractor in the place of Naturopath as well as use it in my advertising. So returning to my Health Emporium, I took a razor blade and the word Naturopath disappeared from my signs on my doors and windows. My hope that I had met every medical requirement was quickly blasted. Just last week I received another communication from that same State Department of Education and Registration and upon calling at that office, was immediately pushed into the sanctum of its attorney. This gentleman opened the interview with a scowl and this remark: ‘It looks like we are having a little trouble getting you into line, doctor.’

‘To which I required: ‘What have I done wrong, now?’.

"‘His beetle-like brows closed together; he clasped his hands before him on the desk and continued to scowl at me: ‘Get that word HEALTH off your doors, windows, letterheads — and do it quick.’

"To which remark I replied: My business has long been known as a HEALTH EMPORIUM. I built my reputation on that designation and have spent many thousands of dollars to bring it to the attention of the public. I can hardly remove the word HEALTH without ruining my business.’

"‘His reply was short and to the point: ‘The word HEALTH belongs exclusively to the medical doctors. It is illegal for anyone else to use it in any manner. There is a law now in effect which gives the medical profession a monopoly on the word HEALTH and you’d better get that in your head clearly right now!’"

This doctor consulted his attorney and found that such a law had been engineered through the state legislature by same underhanded methods they (the medical trust) had pushed other death-dealing measures into operation, such as (1) vaccination, which is known to kill more people every year than smallpox does, (2) tuberculin testing of cows which required the killing of 1,500,000 healthy cows because of false testing in just 10 years time, with a lost of $1,500,000,000 to the dairymen, (3) rabies shots for dogs, which increase diseases in the animals but do not prevent rabies, (4) fluorine (rat poison) in public water supplies because there is a cheap surplus of the product on hand and the owners want to make profit on it, also other practices that are damaging to the public but profitable to the promoters.

MORE FREEDOM DENIED

Back in the middle ages, Galileo was tormented, tortured, and threatened with death because he taught that the world was round. We like to relegate to the past such acts of ignorance and barbarism, and believe that such outrages against progress could not happen in our day and age. But we are having parallels of this same kind of intolerance in the healing field. For instance, Dr. Herbert M. Shelton, Ph.D., D.C., N.D., and head of the Hygienic Movement, was imprisoned several times in New York because he helped people overcome their diseases by observing the laws of health. Saving lives and restoring health is considered a crime in New York and several other states that are ruled by the medical trust, if these works are done by any outside the medical ring. The medical field has no sure cure for any disease, so the people are obliged to suffer and die rather than permit someone who does understand the law of cure to aid them. Dr. Shelton is one of the few practitioners who understands the cause and cure of disease, and seeing that New York is a city of sick people in need of help that they were not getting, he defied the un-American medically made law of New York which prohibits drugless doctors from practicing, opened up an office and was soon gaining fame by his superior results in healing. For this he was imprisoned without even a trial by jury. In accordance with the formalities of pretended justice, an investigator of the Court of Special Sessions in New York, wrote to the Investigator of the State Medical Board in Texas for information about Dr. Shelton. The investigator interviewed Dr. Shelton and after seeing the nature and quality of his work with its consistent effectiveness, had said to him, "I see nothing in your work that is a violation of the law. Stick to it and I will never bother you." He sent a fine report to the New York investigator which was never read before the court. The judge declared him guilty on the opinion of the medical witness and he was sentenced to prison. When he was released, he continued to help the sick and needy and was imprisoned again and again because he refused to respect a law that was enforced against public good and established without the approval or vote of the people. This did not happen in the Dark Ages; it happened in our day, just a few years ago.

A little later, in 1948, Dr. Gian-Cursio, Chiropractor and Hygienist, was sentenced to prison when his drugless healing system and sanitarium, THE CASTLE OF HEALTH, was becoming noted for its successful healing of diseases that the doctors had not been able to cure. He was framed and sentenced to a year in prison without being allowed a trial by jury. (Even a murderer is permitted a jury trial). He was even denied an appeal. The charges were that he was harming people although no evidence was brought forth to prove this statement. A great many of his healed patients were anxious to testify but they were not permitted to do so. As he was a drugless doctor he did not use drugs or any of the dangerous methods such as X-ray, radium, surgery, or anything else that could harm a patient. His testimony was disregarded and only that of the medical "expert witness" (?) was considered valid. So this innocent man of high ideals and clean living had to serve a prison term with hardened criminals while his family was left without support. So openly unjust was this case that letters and telegrams from all parts of United States and even from England, France and Canada poured into the offices of the judge and Governor Dewey of New York, asking that this man he given a fair frial by jury, or an appeal to a higher court, but this was denied.

From his prison cell Dr. Gian-Cursio wrote: (To Dr. Shelton)

"It is a strange schooling that our enemies have forced upon us. It profits us in ways nor expected by them. Prior to, during and after incarceration friendships are strengthened, men who are brothers in arms become more determined in the promulgation of their cause and they acquire a form of wisdom obtained by few.

In this crucible a reformer attains maturity of mind and spirit.

"Our enemies, by making this possible, befriend us. This is a paradox that must be lived to be fully appreciated. Persecution is a sign of decadence. When it ends with imprisonment of the persecuted it is more than a symptom of rot of man and principles, it is a sign of death as moral beings."

These acts of violence indicate the downward trend of organized medicine, toward its own dissolution.

In Florida, where a compulsory Tuberculosis law has been foisted on the people, a man dropped dead in the doctor’s office just a few minutes after the physician had given him a compulsory "shot". In the trial that ensued, the other physicians testified that, "It wasn’t their colleague’s fault; the patient just couldn’t take it." The doctor went free, though he was guilty of murder as well as malpractice

SUPREME COURT ESTABLISHED A PRECEDENT

Supreme Court Justice Cardozo said, in rendering a decision:

‘Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done to his own body, and a surgeon who performs an operation (vaccination is technically an operation) without his patient’s consent, commits an assault for which he is liable in damages."

A British doctor published in a medical journal a detailed account of how he killed a patient. The medical council held that Dr. Barton could not be prosecuted unless it could be proved that Barton’s action did hasten death, that he acted knowingly, and that the patient actually died. Baron told the doctors, "Thank God, you have to prove these things, otherwise you and I would not be free." These or any other guilty physicians are not going to prison or to the electric chair because all they have to do is to declare that their action did not hasten death. Medical doctor’s license does not protect the public; it protects the doctors from prosecution by the public.

"Dr. Simon Louis Katzoff, M.D. wrote. ‘DOCTORS LIVE BY DISEASE, SO THE PUBLIC CAN EXPECT THE SUPPLY OF DISEASE TO MEET THE DEMANDS OF THE MEDICAL PROFESSION.’ When it doesn’t meet the demands, the Health Boards and Tuberculosis societies clamor for compulsory hospitalization and treatment, seizing the victim’s property to pay them."

HEALTH BOOKS ATTACKED BY MEDICAL TRUST

Not only are the health doctors with their superior methods put out of business by the medical "wrecking crew" but the books that teach the truth about healing are under constant attack also. The medical trust has its stooges planted in the post office department and when a good health book gives them too much competition they have a "fraud order" issued and the author and publisher no longer have the use of the mails. These medically made laws see to it that they do not have to come out in the open and declare themselves as the attackers. The author has to fight an unseen enemy who is protected by the law and does not even have to have any proof that the book or author has violated any law. I have followed some of these cases closely and have read the complete transcript of the court proceedings and there is no semblance of justice in this process. The author and the book is condemned and barred from the mails, sometimes even before the hearing. There is never any trial by jury and the decision is always against the writer and in favor of the concealed medical opponent. The decision is based entirely on the private opinion of a hired medical witness. The testimony and proof of innocence of the writers are entirely ignored. as there is no jury.

GANGSTERS IN THE GOVERNMENT

In l946, during one of our largest polio epidemics in Los Angeles, I wrote a book (POLIO CONTROL) exposing the polio racket. My statements were well documented and the doctors didn’t like it. I believe it would have eliminated polio epidemics if it had been allowed to reach the people. I had the manuscript examined by a lawyer before I had it published to be sure everything was legal and in order. I had the Los Angeles Post Office authorities examine it to be sure there was nothing in it for which I could be legally barred from the mails and it was declared within the law. The medical trust had their stooges work for two years trying to get something on me so they could legally put me out of business but when they failed they brazenly issued a fraud order without any legal grounds or lawful reasons. They knew I had no money to fight a case with so they thought I would probably "stay put" when they destroyed my business and put the book out of circulation. I talked to one of the post office officials and asked what I could do and he said, "You can take your lawyer back to Washington and fight but it won’t do you any good; those cases are ‘sewed up’ beforehand." I wrote a long and detailed letter refuting all their false charges but this was disregarded and I was notified by special messenger I was barred from the mails eight days before the day set for my hearing — in other words, I was condemned without a trial. I was convicted on the statement of the medical witness that my "book disagreed with accepted medical belief and therefore was dangerous." (I admit it could be dangerous to the corrupt medical policies.)

On inquiring around I found others who had been barred also without cause. One of these was Al Williams, an ex-pugilist, who had established several gymnasiums in downtown Los Angeles, that were popular with the business men who were interested in keeping fit. He had an especially successful weight reducing system that put the medical methods to shame. This bothered some of the medical boys so they did some string-pulling in Washington and Mr. Williams was soon barred from the mails on fraud charges. This put him practically out of business so he took his lawyer and evidence back to Washington to fight the case, but since no jury trial was permitted and no testimony was accepted except that of the medical "expert witness" of the opposition, the biased judge passed the sentence of "guilty". He took the case to the Supreme Court and won, of course, because he was innocent in the first place and had a clear case. But it cost him $13,000 and three years loss of business to merely establish his right to have his mail delivered.

The guilty culprits in the post office department were not reprimanded or required to pay Mr. Williams damages for his loss. They were left in the same position where they could do the same thing the next day if they wanted to. Even the world’s worst gangsters — Al Capone and his hatchet men — were never guilty of committing as many underhanded and open crimes against life and property as the medical trust has done in this country.

HEALTH RESEARCH ATTACKED BY MEDICAL- TRUST

For the past 12 years Dr. R. G. Wilborn, D.C., and his firm HEALTH RESEARCH has conducted the largest health book business in the west. Thousands of excellent books by educators and the world’s best informed writers on health, were circulating around through the country and raising the health standards of the people. Health is a menace and a threat to the medical profession so the same well-oiled strings were again pulled in Washington and HEALTH RESEARCH was issued a fraud complaint. Dr. Wilborn and this large health business of many years standing were to be suddenly and completely ruined by one fell stroke of the medical dictatorship. Time tested health books that have been selling all over the world from hundreds of book stores were all at once declared to be the cause of the fraud order. And, although the other stores would continue to sell them, HEALTH RESEARCH was to be denied mail delivery and completely put out of business, for selling these same books.

Dr. Wilborn had heard about some of the questionable fraud order cases, so years ago before investing in this expensive book business he checked with the post office authorities and had one of the postal inspectors examine all his stock of books to be sure they met with the legal specifications. The books were declared to be in order so when the fraud charges came he knew it did not originate in the post office department The postal authorities refused to give the names of the attackers who were seeking to destroy the Health Business, so in concealing the criminals the postal authorities become parties to the crime.

Excerpts from the fraud complaint are as follows:

"POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT — OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
HEARING EXAMINER — WASHINGTON 25, D.C.
(May 11, 1955) — delivered May 14, 1955.

‘In the matter of the complaint that HEALTH RESEARCH, Dr. R. G. Wilborn (D.C.) and (partner) are engaged in conducting an unlawful enterprise through the mails . . . The Undersigned, (William C. O’Brian) Assistant Solicitor, Fraud Division, Post Office Dept . . . alleges that the respondents are now and have been obtaining remittance of money through the mails for various books and pamphlets entitled: "Commonsense about Cancer", "The Grape Cure", "Attacking and Arresting Arthritis", "Health for All", "Getting Well", "Is Cancer Cur-able" "The Prostate Gland’ ‘Perfect Health", "Tuberculosis, Its Cause and Cure", "Tumors", and "Back to Eden". by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises as hereinafter set forth.

"That the Publication entitled "Health for All" contains information and instructions the following of which will effectively treat and cure such conditions and diseases as sinusitis, bronchial asthma, goiter, colitis, peptic ulcer, diabetes mellitus, arthritis, rheumatism, high blood pressure and infantile paralysis."

The complaint goes on telling what the books promise in the way of healing. The fact that hundreds of people have been healed of these diseases by following these instructions doesn’t concern the medically dominated Post Office Fraud Department. The medical profession has no cure for any of these diseases and, like the dog in the manger they intend to prevent anyone else from curing them either, or even from having the right to choose their reading matter that will teach them how to do it themselves. These books are also barred from tax supported public libraries so the people are at the mercy of the disease producing medical business unless they rise up and throw off the yoke of medical oppression.

BACK TO EDEN and the GRAPE CURE were barred once before but were reinstated because there were no legal grounds for the action and someone had enough money to fight for them.

HEALTH RESEARCH had sold 500 copies of Back to Eden at $7.00 per copy with a money-back guarantee and the letters flowed in from the satisfied customers who had been healed or helped by its information. Yet, the selling of this book was one or the reasons why Health Research was being prosecuted.

Medically operated organizations and money-making schemes such as the cancer fund raising organizations, March of Dimes money-making racket, vaccination campaigns. etc., are allowed to make untrue and impossible claims and promises and accept fabulous sums of money year after year without ever performing the benefits or fulfilling their promises, yet they are never barred from the mails no matter how brazenly fraudulent they are. If even half of the money, that is filched from the public by these organizations, were put into the hands of some responsible organization like Dr. Shelton’s Hygienic Society and used for public health education purposes, the present disease crisis of this country could soon be brought under control.

Dr. Wilborn knew he would not get a fair trial by jury if he tried to fight the case in Washington so he waged a campaign from his office in California and hired a good lawyer who knew the post office "set-up", (Attorney James B. Gooding, of Washington D.C.) to fight the case from there. When Dr. Wilborn’s letters (about the fraud complaint) reached the hands of his large mailing list, a barrage of letters flew to Washington (Congress and Senate) asking for an investigation of the corrupt, medically contaminated Post Office Fraud Department. Racketeers don’t like to be investigated so the "under cover boys" in the Post Office modified their charges immediately and admitted that the books were not fraudulent and were no longer under attack. However, they still held the whip lash over the head of HEALTH RESEARCH if its advertising suggested cure in any way, shape or form. The medicos still insist that the word cure is their private property just the same as they have tried to "corner" the whole healing business.

The Health Research Case brought into view a number of other submerged cases. One contact who had been barred from the mails wrote to Dr. Wilborn as follows: "To give you an idea of what smaller businesses are up against in the Food and Drug Administration-Post Office combination of the Medical Trust, let it be remembered that any company can be put under fraud order without due process of law — just upon the opinion of any lawyer in the Post Office Department. The fraud law was written in 1874 and needs re-writing to bring about justice. We are still working with the authorities in Washington to get this done. Once a fraud smear is issued, then supposedly due process of law can be carried on for its removal. Actually, however, the set-up is extremely corrupt. It is so corrupt that the Head Trial Examiner of the Post Office "blew his top" about two years ago and sent an eleven page report to both the Senate and the House Judiciary Committees. He then transferred to the Federal Power Commission. His report was a protest against pressures constantly brought to bear to have him violate the Administrative Procedures Act which guarantees fair hearings to citizens, in theory at least, and forbids any private contact with Examiners or Judges to influence decisions. After his departure, more crooked decisions occurred.

A fraud order is supposed to be based on legitimate complaints. When Dr. Wilborn’s customers wrote to the Fraud Department for the complaints or for any statements he had made in his advertising that could be considered fraudulent, the officials in the Post Office Department wrote:

"This office does not make a general distribution of the specification of charges issued in these fraud order cases and, therefore your request for such a copy must be denied."

When Dr. Wilborn’s customers asked for the names of his accusers, the post office refused to reveal their names. If a charge is serious enough to ruin a person’s business, reputation and life work, is it asking too much to know who his attackers are so he can meet them in fair fight?

WHERE CRIME PAYS

We like to believe that crime doesn’t pay. But we see the constant multiplication of deaths from unnecessary operations and medically poisoned patients where the doctor "buries his mistakes" and then collects a small fortune from the survivors. We see the multi-million dollar "take" from the vaccination campaigns conducted at least twice a year in all American cities. We see health businesses and writers ruined by unjust and dishonest fraud orders, in which they have no chance of winning unless they can afford a Supreme Court case, and few health idealists are wealthy enough to buy justice at such a price. Liberty and protection in a free country should be the right of the poor as well as the rich. We are wondering when we will be released from this curse of medical domination — where crime pays.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

THE HYGIENIC SYSTEM, Vol. 2, 3, 6, 7 Dr. Herbert M. Shelton —P. 0. Box 1277, San Antonio, Texas.
BECHAMP OR PASTEUR? — E. Douglas Hume —
FACTS AGAINST COMPULSORY VACCINATION — H. B. Anderson, Citizens’ Medical Reference Bureau, 226 W. 47th St., New York City.
VITAL FACTS ABOUT FOODS — Otto Carque — Health Research.
THE MEDICAL VOODOO — Annie Riley Hale.
THE VACCINATION PROBLEM — Joseph P. Swan —
VACCINATION A CRIME — Felix Oswald.
PUBLIC HEALTH THE AMERICAN WAY — H. B. Anderson — Citizens’ Medical Reference Bureau, 1860 Broadway, Suite 1215, N. Y. 23, N. Y.
THE GOLDEN CALF — Charles W. Forward, John M. Watkins Co. — 21 Cecil Court, Charing Cross Road, W.C.2, London.
PHILOSOPHY OF HEALTH — Dr. John Tilden —
SYPHILIS THE WEREWOLF OF MEDICINE — Dr. Herbert M. Shelton.
VACCINATION A DELUSION — Alfred Russel Wallace — National Anti-Vaccination League — Swan Sonnenschein and Co. — Lim., London.
THE TRUTH ABOUT VACCINATION — Lily Loat — Health Research.
THE VACCINATION SUPERSTITION — J. W. Hodge — Niagara Falls, N.Y.
UNANSWERABLE OBJECTIONS TO VACCINATION — Isaac L. Peebles.
MEDICAL DELUSIONS — Thomas Morgan — Guiding Star Pub. House —314 W. 63rd St., Chicago, Ill.
ROYAL COMMISSION ON VACCINATION — London.
VACCINATION AND THE MEDICAL PROFESSION — Pub. by W. J. Furnival — Stone Staffs, London.
SMALLPOX AND VACCINATION — H. V. Knaggs Health Research.
SCHICK INOCULATION—ITS DANGERS AND FALLACIES — M. Beddow Bayly — London
THE VACCINATION DELUSION — W. R. Hadwen, M.D. — London.
A BLUNDER IN POISONS — C. F. Nichols.
THE STORY OF THE SALK ANTI-POLIOMYELITIS VACCINE BY M. BEDDOW BAYLY, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P.

February 4, 1956—
THE ROMANCE OF FLUORIDES (No. 1)—Salk Vaccine and Sodium Fluoride have one thing in common. The Salk concoction kills and cripples children quickly. Sodium fluoride in municipal water systems slowly poisons everyone who drinks the water. In a 6-month investigation, which took us across the continent and back and included interviews with both proponents and opponents, these salient standout facts were uncovered:

(1) Sodium fluoride is a cumulative paralyzing poison.
(2) The US government won’t permit any product containing sodium fluoride to be shipped anywhere in interstate commerce, because it is a deadly poison
(3) The statement that "fluoride prevents tooth decay" is totally untrue. There are more dental caries in school children in towns which have fluoride in its water than in those which don’t
(4) Sincere proponents have been confused by sales promoters of sodium fluoride into thinking this synthetic chemical (made from aluminum filing tailings) is the same as natural (calcium type) fluoride which is beneficial when found in the diet.
(5) The story that Deaf Smith County (Texas) is a "town without a toothache" is 100% false. The one-time lone dentist of the town (Dr. George W.Heard, now retired) says he has been widely misquoted. In this city of 6,000 three dentists are working overtime now. Some wag suggested it will soon be "the town without a tooth."
(6)The claim is that only 1 part sodium fluoride to 1,000,000 parts of water will "not hurt a fly". S0--if it isn’t strong enough to damage the delicate membrane of the stomach and intestines, only a nitwit would believe it would have any effect on the hard enamel of the teeth.
(7) The USPHS has been corrupted by commercial interests which are getting rid of an unsalable waste product and forcing the taxpayers to pay over $15,000,000 a year for it.
(8) The only use for sodium fluoride heretofore has been (a) As a rat poison;  (b) By cattlemen to partially sterilize their bulls so they will be more tractable; (c) By the Russian secret police to make their prisoners stupid so they can be more easily brainwashed.

February 11, 1956.
ROMANCE OF FLUORIDES (No. 2)-We’ve just received a clipping of an editorial from the Portland OREGONIAN for Jan. 5. It says in part: "A 10-year test of the twin cities of Newburgh and Kinston (NY) shows that fluoridation of water supplies greatly reduced tooth decay in children. In 1945 sodium fluoride was added to the water supply of Newburgh, while Kinston’s water remained untreated. Six weeks ago the test was completed and showed that youngsters in the 6-16 age group in Newburgh had 41 to 58% less tooth decay than their counterparts in Kinston."

This wouldn’t be important if the Portland "news"-paper was the only one which used this hogwash. Many mediums all over the country betrayed their reading public by using it also . There is only one word that describes it—an outright barefaced lie. The facts were available had the Portland rag wanted to use them. Fortunately for our readers, we also have before us the official report of the NY State Education Dept., signed by John A. Forst, MD, chief of the schools’ bureau of health service.

It says that in Kinston (the city that had pure water the last 10 years) 5,308 pupils were inspected and 2,209 found with tooth defects. It says that in Newburgh (where the town’s water contains sodium fluoride) 4,969 pupils were inspected and 3,139 found with tooth defects. Kinston, the city with pure water, had 339 more pupils inspected but found 930 less with bad teeth, or 41%. Newburgh, the city with fluoride in its water, had 63% of its pupils with bad teeth. NEED ANYTHING MORE BE SAID?

No—but we’ll say it anyhow. Newburghers say there is an alarming increase of heart and kidney disorders in their city. The Newburgh Health Dept. reports 40 cases of infectious hepatitis in 1954, whereas there hadn’t been any of that trouble in the previous 10 years. We wonder why?

After Dr. Forst made the "mistake" of being so forthright and honest he was raked over the coals by his superiors. He and the school director of dental health were forced to sign a letter to the New York TIMES "explaining" this faux pas. The explanation is so silly as to be almost unbelievable. Briefly, the alibi was that different people made the examination of the children in the different cities—therefore "the examination means nothing". Yet— No attempt was made to explain why, in a city (Newburgh) where everyone was told that fluorided water would wipe out tooth cavities, two-thirds of the children still had dental defects after a four year "experiment".

If honest figures were obtainable from Evanston (Ill.) and Grand Rapids (Mich.)—the other two cities designated by the USPHS aluminum trust propagandists as "test cities"—they probably would show the same results. However, such figures aren’t available, but the figures for an alarming increase of other diseases, which fluorides can cause, are.

Congressman Miller of Nebraska, himself a medical physician who is solid enough to investigate fluorides before being stampeded into advocating them, says:

"A check of vital statistics of Grand Rapids, shows that the death rate from heart disease in 1944 numbered 585. Four years later, after fluoridation had started, there were 1,059 deaths. There was an increase of 50% in the death rate from nephritis. There was an increase of 50%, over this 4-year period in deaths from intracranial lesions. These are official figures contained in the vital statistics of the United States published annually by the US Public Health Service."

The Grand Rapids health officer tried to "neutralize" Dr. Miller’s disclosures by a letter quoting a false figure (25%) which he said was the population increase of Grand Rapids in that 4-year period. Dr. Miller came right back with the US Census figures showing that Grand Rapids has only increased 7.8% in the period the fluoride propagandists said it had jumped ahead by one-fourth.

It is also significant that this same health officer has announced the launching of a program to train 20 members of his staff in mental health problems. It looks like he thinks fluorides are causing insanity, as well as heart and kidney troubles, hepatitis, nephritis and cranial lesions.

February 18, 1956.
ROMANCE OF FLUORIDES (No. 3)—Mass medication is a violation of every concept of medical practice. Compulsory medication is a violation of the Constitution of the United States, and of every state in the Union.

The city fathers of over 900 American cities have been bamboozled, hornswoggled, fooled, pressured and (in some cases) bribed into mass poisoning of their citizenry by the dumping of rat poison known as Sodium Fluoride into their city water plants. The theory (or superstition) is that it will prevent tooth, decay in children.

Even if it did, that would be no justification for poisoning entire populations. It would be sufficient to paint the teeth of the children to be immunized from toothache. Last week’s CAPSULE NEWS showed beyond any doubt that fluoride in water increases, rather than decreases, tooth troubles. This week we are going to prove, by competent medical and mental authorities, that the toxic chemical known as sodium fluoride is a slow acting but positive cumulative degenerating poison, destroying the cells of the heart, kidneys, liver, and other soft-tissue organs.

Dr. Frederick B. Exner, M.D., of Seattle, Washington is recognized the world over as one of the leading authorities on fluoridation. He has been called as an expert witness before committees of Congress and various state legislatures. He says: ‘Fluoride has no known action on the unerupted (not-yet-grown) tooth…….

Fluoride, even in minute doses, accumulates in the body. After sufficient time, it causes cumulative poisoning. Fluoride is excreted largely thru the kidneys. Consequently, earlier and more severe damage occurs in people with impaired kidney functions. It is also more severe in diabetics and others who drink unusual amounts of water . . . Even if fluorides were safe to use, even if the promised benefits could be expected (which they can’t) fluoride still should not be put in the water supply. Aside from practical and moral objections, IT IS MEDICAL INSANITY."

Dr. Charles T. Betts is a leading dentist in Toledo, Ohio. For many years he has made a study of the effect of using aluminum kitchen utensils in cancer incidence. Since artificial fluorides are mainly made from aluminum filing tailings—an unsalable poisonous byproduct of aluminum manufacture—Dr. Betts is in an excellent position to testify to the effects of fluoride poisoning. He says:

"Fluorides are a poison which is cumulative in the body similiar to radium. No antidote is known. It is a waste gas or by-product in the manufacture of metallic aluminum cooking utensils. There is no provision in any city charter that gives officials the right to commit the criminal act of poisoning its citizens due to ignorance of basic law. . . In Akron, Ohio, I spoke to their city council— showed them what they would be doing if they attempted to kill their women and children with these fluorides. In went the fluorides anyway . . . In two months thousands were covered with leprosy sores. Now $18,000 worth of fluorides are for sale, also the machinery . . . In this mass medication program all water boards so committing it are guilty of practicing medicine, dentistry and pharmacy without a license."

George L. Waldbott, M.D., Detroit physician who has made an extensive study of the effect of fluorides on the human body, says:

‘All reports of fluoride poisoning emphasize the great variety of symptoms, the insidious onset, the slow course of the disease, the fact that death is caused by a general wasting away and not by the involvement of only one organ. Symptoms show that fluorides interfere with the normal utilization of calcium and phosphorous in the body. It prevents depositing of bone substances in joints and ligaments especially in the lower spine and causes temporary hardening of the bones, teeth, nails and hair, followed by softening of bones and nails. . . Experiments have been made in the towns of Cameron and Bartlett (Texas) where there is a high incidence of fluorine in the water. It was found that 10.1 out of every 100 inhabitants had eye cataracts, 13.8 arthritis, 10.1 bone changes, 19.4 bearing defects, brittle nails and severely mottled teeth. . . The incidence of these defects over the entire nation is far lower than this—being only I in 100 for cataracts.

Canton Brehmer, DDS, writing in the Journal of the American Dental Assn., says that his city of Sheboygan has had fluoridated water for seven years…….that lately mottled enamel has begun to show up. . . it is not pretty . . . it is a serious disfigurement to those who are interested in their looks . . . what it does to them further inside I do not like to think of."

The Newburg (NY) NEWS, the town which is being used as a guinea pig for the aluminum trust’s fluoride salesmen, said on Jan. 27, 1954: Heart deaths in Newburg this year totaled 283, or 882 per 100,000 population. The rate for the nation as a whole was only 507 per 100,000.

Mrs. Madeline E. Healy, director of a Boston laboratory for blood allergen diagnostic testing, said sodium fluoride is an efficient rat exterminator, a protoplasmic poison because (in all instances of use) it causes slow or rapid destruction of cells and since 1855 pharmacologists have been aware that it serves no useful purpose to man.

The Bulletin of the Hudson County (N. J.) Dental Society for Dec. 1955 pointed out that a Federal court in Oregon awarded $38,290 damages from the Reynolds Metals Company (large aluminum producers) to an Oregon family named Martin. The Martins suffered serious injury to livers, kidneys and digestive functions from eating vegetables and other farm products contaminated by fumes from the nearby plant. Witnesses testified that they had contracted the disease known as fluorosis.

Dr. George W. Heard, retired dentist of Hereford (Deaf Smith County, Texas) whose words were twisted and misrepresented by COLLIERS MAGAZINE in an article called "The Town Without a Toothache", says "I believe that fluorine does, in a mild way, retard caries, but I also believe that the damage it does is far greater than any good it may appear to accomplish. It makes teeth so brittle and crumbly they can be treated only with difficulty, if at all."

Dr. William P. Martzowska (Mich.) dentist, says ‘sodium fluoride steals calcium from the body. In naturally fluoridated water—water conditioned by nature for 1,000 years_—fluorine occurs in the form of calcium fluoride, in an organic combination. This calcium (natural) fluoride does not steal the calcium from the body since it brings its own calcium with it.’

Benjamin C. Nesin, director of NY City’s utility laboratories says: ‘Never in the history of water supply has a substance so toxic in nature, with such a high degree of physiological potency, and associated with so much adverse evidence affecting public health, been considered for introduction into public water supplies.

Gordon Leitch, MD, Portland (Oregon) pointed out that fluoridation endorsement by the American Dental Ass’n is utterly meaningless for the same reason that clergymen are expected to be against sin.

The Rev. Lyle F. Sheen of Geneseo, Illinois, after an investigation of the effect and non-effect of fluorides, has offered $1,000 reward to anyone who can prove (1) That sodium fluoride will prevent tooth decay, (2) That SF is not poisonous even in small amounts, (3) That the moon is made of green cheese.

Rabies Past Present in Scientific Review
Millicent Morden (Physician & Surgeon)

Rabies was an old superstition — a relic of the times when devils ran to and fro between animal and man carrying disease.

Pasteur, who had previously had a hemorrhage of the brain, changed this old superstition into a money-making disease.

Rabies is now a pet child of the Vivisection Trust which works internationally.

If vivisection has proven anything it has proven the impossibility of man contracting any real disease from a dog.

How long will filthy lucre keep the facts from the fooled public?

In early times, as recorded in articles available in old libraries, the kiss of a king would cure rabies. It was later discovered that a piece of the king’s garment would be as efficacious.

Still later the "mad stone" when applied over the area of the bite would "draw out the madness". Later some of the "hair of the dog that bit you" could either be chewed and swallowed or bound on the wound.

A still later discovery was that which employed an extract of "wild cockroach".

In 1806 a Mr. Kraus was awarded $1000, by the then rulers of New York temtory for his scientific discovery which had kept rabies out of New York for Over twenty years. His formula is a matter of record and consisted of the ground-up jaw bone of an ass or dog, a piece of colt’s tongue and the green rust off a penny of George the First reign.

This latter seems to have kept rabies out of the limelight until the time of Pasteur. Medicine has heard much of the startling cure of Joseph Meister by Pasteur. Little mention is made of the fact that three relatives of the Meister boy were bitten by the same dog and without benefit of the Pasteur treatment recovered completely.

Dr. H. Bastian, a contemporary, took sharp issue with Pasteur’s scientific ideas and conclusions. Another contemporary of Pasteur, Dr. Antoine Bechamp, took violent exceptions to Pasteur’s reports on rabies and, incidentally, it was Dr. Bechamp who claimed to have previously discovered the cause of the silkworm disease. He also (Bechamp) was the man who made the discoveries on fermentation. The records of the French Academy of Science substantiate Bechamp’s claims.

Dr. W. R. Hadwen of England was also in controversy with Pasteur. Dr. William A. Bruette, former assistant chief of the Bureau of Animal Industry in Washington, was also a contemporary of Pasteur and gave many proofs of Pasteur’s incorrect findings. Dr. Bruette has proved, as a matter of fact, that rabies vaccine is not only a fraud, but harmful. He scores the use of rabies vaccine and states that "inoculation spreads disease." He goes as far as to call the sale of rabies vaccine an out and out racket.

Dr. Matthew Woods, another contemporary of Pasteur, then a leading member of the Philadelphia Medical. Society, wrote much on the subject of rabies. He stated, "at the Philadelphia dog pound, where on an average more than 6,000 vagrant dogs are taken annually, and where the catchers and keepers are frequently bitten while handling them, not one case of hydrophobia has occurred during it’s entire history of twenty-five years, in which time 150,000 dogs have been handled."

"The records of the London Hospital, a few years ago, showed 2,668 persons bitten by angry dogs. None of them developed hydrophobia."

St. George’s Hospital, London, records 4,000 patients bitten by dogs supposed to have been mad. No case of hydrophobia.

"In the record of all the diseases which have occurred at the Pennsylvania Hospital in one hundred and forty years, only two cases which were supposed to be hydrophobia have occurred. One of these, however, the only one submitted to bacteriological test, did not confirm the diagnosis, ‘hydrophobia’ and the local health authorities refused to register the death as due to rabies."

Dr. Charles W. Dulles, lecturer on the History of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, who was appointed by the Medical Societies of the state to investigate rabies stated that he is "inclined to the view that there is no such specific malady" because after sixteen years of investigation he had "failed to find a single case on record that can be conclusively proved to have resulted from the bite of a dog or any other cause." The report and Dr. Woods’ letter were endorsed by Dr. Theophilus Parvin of Jefferson Medical College and President of the National Academy of Medicine; Dr. Thomas G. Morten, Coroners Physician; Dr. Charles K. Mills of the University of Pennsylvania and Dr. Thomas I. Mays of the Polyclinic Hospital.

Dr. Woods recently wrote a discourse of mimetic diseases, in which he discussed rabies. His evidence supports the view that so-called human rabies is the result of a disordered imagination (fear). In animals, so-called rabies is fundamentally due to maltreatment or malnutrition or both.

Dr. Wilcox of New York investigated a "rabies scare" because of eleven alleged deaths from rabid dog bites. Upon complete investigation, it was found that not one of these deaths was due to rabies. With the publication of his report to the city council, the "rabies scare" ended forthwith.

Dr. Elmer Lee ended another rabies scare on Staten Island. On autopsy the rabid dog was found to have died of thread worms and not rabies. The worms were lodged in the heart of the animal.

A similar finding of worms ended the Kiondike Rabies Panic.

Dr. Stillman, in 1922 voiced the opinion that rabies was "pure humbug" and that in over forty years as a practicing physician with a very busy practice and wide travels throughout Europe, he stated that he had "never seen a case of hydrophobia or rabies."

In a letter answering a request for information, Dr. Stillman stated: "Several years ago there was considerable excitement occasioned by the declaration of a rabies quarantine by the state department of agriculture in Albany, N. Y. It lasted two years. Many dogs were killed. Their heads were sent on for official examination at Cornell College Veterinary department. Many were pronounced rabid, but the test was dependent upon the presence of certain Negri bodies in the animal’s brain."

"I was told by a pupil of Pasteur in France that these Negri bodies were sometimes present when there was no suspicion whatever of rabies. We sent the head of a harmless little dog without any disease symptoms whatever to Cornell and it was promptly pronounced rabid. Finally I went to the department of Agriculture, which had charge, and insisted that our society would hold all dogs declared rabid and we would see if any cases of rabies would develop. Not one case of rabies appeared and we have never had any since. When the animals were held simply to show whether they had rabies, none of them died and the entire scare subsided after two years of fanatical unrest and excitement which ought to have developed lyssophobia, or imaginary hydrophobia."

Dr. J. W. Hodge reported that of 56,000 stray dogs and cats collected in one year, not one case of rabies was found. He further states that there is no rabies in England nor is the Pasteur treatment permitted to be used. Dr. Hodge has in his possession the names and addresses of more than 2500 persons reported as having died of "hydrophobia" shortly after having received the Pasteur preventive treatment. This would seem to prove that the cure is more deadly than the disease when one considers that nearly 300 of these "victims" of the Pasteur treatment had no recollection of ever having been bitten by a dog. Dr. Hedge predicted that "future generations will look upon the present day delusion about hydrophobia and the Pasteur treatment with feelings akin to those which we experience when reading the history of witchcraft delusion."

Dr. Dulles, previously referred to, has said, "I might cite my own experience in the treatment of persons bitten by dogs supposed to be mad, which has furnished not a single case of the developed disease in thirty years. And I have probably seen more cases of so-called hydrophobia than any other medical man." Dr.Dulles was lecturer on the History of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Consulting Surgeon to Rush Hospital and Manager of University Hospital.

Dr. William Brady, nation-wide columnist, has stated that, "The Pasteur treatment for rabies is a blind treatment and no one knows whether Pasteur treatment confers any protection against rabies. I’d never willingly receive Pasteur treatment or give it to any one under any conceivable circumstances, because I fear the material so injected has a disastrous effect in some instances. It is not always successful and, occasionally, paralysis follows its use." It Is Dr. Brady’s opinion that rabies "does not occur in man."

"We, of the medical profession, have witnessed many errors perpetrated by good-intentioned, but misguided individuals and methods. The digitalis standardization by the dog’s heart, it will be recalled, resulted in a 300 per cent variance from standard."

In a hook entitled, "Bechamp or Pasteur," by E. D. Hume, there may be found much proof pertinent to our discussion. A notable failure of the Pasteur treatment was that of a young postman, named Pierre Roscol, who, with another man, was attacked by a dog supposed to be mad, but was not bitten, for the dog’s teeth did not penetrate his clothing; but his companion received severe bites. The latter refused to go to the Pasteur Institute and remained in perfect health; but the unfortunate Roscal was forced by the postal authorities to undergo the treatment, beginning March 9th. On the following April 12th severe symptoms set in with pain at the point of inoculation, not at the place of the bite, for he had never been bitten. On April 14th he died of paralytic "hydrophobia" the new disease brought into the world by Pasteur.

Another incident extracted from the same book shows the power of suggestion or fear in the causation of so-called rabies. It is hard to credit, but the case is recorded as follows.

"Two young Frenchmen were bitten by the same dog at Havre. One died from the effects within a month, but, before this, his friend had sailed for America, where he lived for fifteen years in ignorance of the end of his former companion. Returning to France, he heard of the tragedy and, actually himself, developed symptoms, and within three weeks was dead of "hydrophobia."

Another interesting recorded case is that of a lady, who returning from bathing, stated that she had been bitten by a dog. "The anxious parents rushed her for Pasteur treatments, she became violently ill, death followed. On the way home from the funeral the girl companions who were bathing with her told the parents of the dead girl that she was not bitten by a dog but by her young man friend."

There are over 3.000 deaths on record in reports from the Pasteur Institute, of persons bitten by dogs. All died after treatments. On the other hand, the record of the London Hospital, a few years ago, showed 2,668 persons bitten by angry dogs: not one of them developed hydrophobia and not one had been treated by the Pasteur method.

"Who was this man Pasteur? What did he actually discover? The answer to the first is that he was a chemist of sorts. The second question can be answered only with the reminder that he separated L & D tartic acids. That is absolutely all he did. The rest of his work—yea——even the silkworm disease and bacterial work was plagiarized from that, not too well-known and much neglected professor of Montpellier, Antoine Bechamp. Professor Bechamp’s writings, when properly studied, will be found to have afforded the solution to many of the problems which had puzzled biologists, physiologists, pathologists and philosophers for many years." —flume.

Speaking of Professor Bechamp’s works, Dr. Leverson of England says, "I also found in those truths absolute proof of the absurdity of the germ theory of disease; and, by the study of the writings of Pasteur, to which Bechamp’s works unavoidably led me, I found full proof that the great god of the (supposedly) men of science of the latter half of the last century and of many of the present, was in fact, the most astonishing of plagiarists and distorter of other men’s discoveries; chiefly those of Professor Antoine Bechamp, and of his collaborators and pupils; and that this plagiarist was the most monumental charlatan, whose existence is disclosed to us, in the entire recorded history of medicine."

"You have already surmised who was this plagiarist and charlatan. It was Louis Pasteur, to whose memory France has erected statues all over the land and endowed the Pasteur Institute."

Since this record is not an enviable one, let us view rabies from the standpoint of the known facts. We have seen that normal dogs are also classified as rabid by the so-called microscation of these so-called Negri bodies. We have also seen that the identification of these so-called Negri bodies is dependent upon the individual observer. Seldom do observers agree. Experts at the Pasteur Institute admit that Negri bodies are not a specific indication of rabies. They also record many deaths by treatment with the Pasteur system.

On the other hand, reported untoward effects in nontreated patients (very few cases are reported it will be noticed) can be explained on the basis of fear or susceptibility to slight injuries. For example, Dr. W. W. Duke of Kansas City, among others, on writing on allergy, cites cases of violent convulsions and deaths following slight injuries in individuals seemingly in perfect mental and physical condition.

These violent deaths are reported as resulting from scratches, tooth extraction, hypodermic injections, extremes of heat or cold, shock due to various causes, love affairs, etc. The allergy experts often lay stress on the relative importance of former illness which may have undermined the health of the patient. Such varied causes would indicate "fear" plays a profound role in the sequelae observed.

Dr. Buisson of France had been badly bitten by a dog and was given up to die of hydrophobia. He recited that his fear was, of course, intense as was his suffering. He decided to try to relieve his sufferings by a warm bath. After soaking for one and a quarter hours, his convulsions disappeared and he became well. He cured all other cases which came to him in a similar way. The Buisson baths were employed with great success in France in rabies cases.

In Germany, cases of dog bites are sensibly treated by applying suction to the wound or squeezing it to induce and low free bleeding. They leave the clotted and dried blood on the wound without further treatment and they never have further trouble.

In my experience, nothing stronger than mild soap and water should be used on such wounds. I feel that cauterization is too shocking to the tissues.

Is rabies then a disease? Have we isolated a virus or germ? Is the Pasteur-treatment specific? Is rabies, in short, fact or fancy? I believe it is fancy, for I have handled so-called rabid animals and humans without benefit of Pasteur treatment and in no case has there been a death or any other symptoms of rabies. I submit that rabies is non-existent and that the Pasteur treatment for rabies is worse than the disease, if it were a disease, which it is not.

P. S. I have examined and witnessed the repeated examinations of every part of the brains of the so-called rabid dogs. The mouse and rabbit tests have proved ridiculous ever since the time of Pasteur.

MILLICENT MORDEN
Physician & Surgeon
72 Norman Ave.
Brooklyn 22, NY

[Home]