The Secret Family Courts (Court abuse of children)
[back] Child Health  Family Abuse  Secrecy  Secret Courts  Social Services

[Secrecy is usually a sign of nefarious activity which looks to be taking fathers out of families and increasing access to children for Elite Pedophiles.]

See: Social Services (UK)   Pedophilia Secrecy  Shaken Baby Syndrome  Munchausen's Syndrome by ProxyJudge watch  Family Abuse  Brittle bones and child abuse

[DVD] Traffic

Child Protective Services
Question a doctor and lose your child
Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS)

The sinister spread of justice behind closed doors

Critics
Charles Pragnell  
Jack Frost 
Christopher Booker
Camilla Cavendish
Greg Hallett
Nancy Schaefer
UKSecretCourts
Dr. Lynne Wrennall
Bill Maloney
Keith Harmon Snow

[vid] Government's Secret Family Courts - Bill Maloney Reports

Victims
Maryanne Godboldo

[2009 July 17] A moving response to our family justice campaign by Camilla Cavendish

[2009 July] Is the state guilty of child kidnap? One of the most disturbing features of life in modern Britain has been the extraordinary powers given to social workers to seize children from their parents, too often – when those powers are abused – supported by the police and family courts. What makes this still more alarming is the legal bar on reporting these episodes, supposedly to protect the children, which again too often works to protect the social workers themselves at the expense of the children. John Hemming MP said: "Don't protest about Children's Services or the state will section you and silence you. What I find particularly concerning about this article is the way in which the father concerned was silenced as a result of being wrongly sectioned."

[2008 July 22] Times wins ruling over secrecy of family court  The boy’s stepfather was sent to prison for 16 months for helping the mother to remove him from care and flee abroad. She has since had another baby, the couple’s first child. The stepfather has been released from prison but is forbidden to contact his wife.

[2008 July 9] Family justice: your word against theirs by Camilla Cavendish  Two years ago, a group of MPs with falsely accused constituents asked the Government how many people nationally were accused of having MSbP. The Government replied that it did not collect such data - even though Department of Health guidelines tell charity workers, nursery nurses, teachers and even pharmacists to look out for the condition.

[2008 July 7] Family courts: the hidden untouchables by Camilla Cavendish  It took a year for the police to interview Mason under caution, and another year for her to be tried. During that time her access to her children was tightly curtailed. At worst she was allowed only an hour and a half with them once a month. Eventually a jury unanimously found her not guilty of causing grevious bodily harm. But social workers stuck to their own “guilty” verdict. They pressed on and served adoption papers. It took another two years for her to get two of her children back, with the help of the doctor who had made the original diagnosis. But the middle child had been allowed to see so little of her that he is likely to be adopted rather than returned.

[2008 July 6 ] Family justice: the secret state that steals our children by Camilla Cavendish   She described a world where courts need no criminal conviction to remove your child, only the word of a psychiatrist or doctor, and can deny you the chance to call any expert in your defence. A world that uses the “welfare of the child” to gag you from discussing your case. Where even if you prove yourself innocent on appeal, your children may already have been adopted: in which case you will never be allowed to contact them again. A world which had treated her so badly, this rather pretty and utterly normal young woman, that she was sincerely thanking me just for listening. .........Some of these children were being told that they were in care because their parents no longer wanted them. As soon as a care order is made, the local authority controls all communications between parents and children. In many cases contact is gradually reduced, sometimes from a few hours a week to an hour or so a month, at which point social workers can return to court and claim that the child no longer has a strong bond with his family. Such tactics are unbearable.

[2008] Baby 'snatched' from mother minutes after birth is ordered BACK into foster care 

[2007] The rank hypocrisy of family court judges by Camilla Cavendish this peculiar case concerns a woman whose baby was removed by social workers, not because the child came to any harm but because there was a suspicion that her father might have injured a child from his previous marriage. That suspicion was never proven, no charges were ever brought and the child of the earlier marriage was never removed. But a woman who everyone agrees is blameless has lost her only child – for ever – because she is deemed to be besotted with a man who may pose a danger.

[2007] How the state stole my daughter Yvonne Coulter

[2006] Guilty until proved innocent: the grotesque reality of family courts by Camilla Cavendish   Of the seven child abuse cases he has covered in the criminal courts over the past few years, all have ended in the quashing of convictions. Some of the defendants — Angela Cannings and Sally Clark — have become household names. But of the five cases he has covered in the family courts, all have ended in the parents losing their children for ever. You will probably never know the names of those people. Their names must be changed and their faces blocked out, to “protect” the children. It is hard to expose miscarriages of justice when the stories are drained of human content.

[2006] 'I'VE GONE THROUGH HELL OF SECRECY IN FAMILY COURTS'  she was taken from her mother on the basis of a false allegation, placed with foster parents for 13 months and freed for adoption by a judge who said that he was making his ruling on the basis that social services had delayed her case for two-and-a-half years.

[Speech by Tammy Coulter] Opening Up Family Courts

Books

[2017] The Worst Interest of the Child: The Trafficking of Children and Parents Through U.S. Family Courts

 http://www.amazon.com
There is a "New Holocaust" happening in family courts. Everyone is turning a blind eye to this atrocity. Family court for the last 30 years have been behaving like an "Aleister Crowley cult" sacrificing the purity and innocence children for kicks and kickbacks Child lawyers and GALs will throw the child under a train for the financial gain they will receive personally and professionally.
Billions of taxpayers dollars have been used protecting this atrocity of sex crimes against children instead of protecting best interest of the child. My child was stolen and given to my abuser. The Domestic violence judge assisted with the aiding, abetting, and protection of my abuser. I received a letter from the governor of New York that she is currently under investigation so I hope I can share light to the lives of others as a mother of a child of "Court Licensed Abuse" and "A Judge Ordered Kidnapping" --Harriet Holland

The Gulag Of The Family Courts by Jack Frost  The book exposes a secret UK judicial system that is not even known to Parliament, is not accountable to its Minister in Parliament and about which the press are forbidden to report, under pain of immediate imprisonment. The scandal concerns a huge number of false allegations made against innocent and vulnerable parents in 'secret', so that their children can be forcibly taken from them and traded, often into an industry of 'connections', in a nether world that excludes the press and is completely opaque, unscrutinised and unaccountable
[2007] Family Court HELL by Mark Harris

[2005] Institutional Injustice: The Family Courts at Work by Martin Mears

[2012] A Life Sentence by Keith Harmon Snow

Links
Beware Family Court: What Victims and Advocates Should Know
F.A.C.T. (Falsely Accused Carers and Teachers) http://www.factuk.org/

http://www.unity-injustice.co.uk

http://rightsformothers.com/