Video Evidence of 9-11 Explosions Censored
by Christopher Bollyn
June 28, 2002
Video footage and photographs from 9-11 have been suppressed to prevent
Americans from seeing and hearing evidence of unexplained explosions at the
World Trade Center.
Although the terror attacks in New York and Washington of 9-11 occurred in broad
daylight and were seen by millions around the world via television, heavy-handed
media censorship has suppressed video footage that challenged the official
version of events. European news networks have video footage and photos that
indicate explosions occurred within the twin towers of the World Trade Center
before and during the collapses. This evidence, however, is being suppressed and
ignored by the U.S. media and government agencies supposedly investigating the
causes of the towers' structural failures.
Relatives and fire engineering experts recently acknowledged the censorship and
called on the government to allow the investigators to "review" the "essential"
video and photographic evidence during a public meeting. The meeting held in
New York City on June 24, was to "gather comments and suggestions" as a
preliminary step for the "fact-finding" investigation planned by the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
President George W. Bush asked NIST to conduct an investigation into the
collapse of the WTC buildings. Dr. Arden Bement, Jr., appointed by the
president in August 2001, directs NIST, a bureau of the Department of Commerce.
Bement was previously head of Purdue University's School of Nuclear Engineering.
Prior to joining Purdue in 1993, he was vice-president of science and technology
for TRW, Inc. and served as the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Research
and Engineering and within the Department of Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency (DARPA).
NIST will report its findings to Secretary of Commerce Donald L. Evans through
his deputy, Phillip Bond. Evans is "almost like a brother" to Bush, according to
Karen Hughes, Bush's White House counselor. Evans raised some $100 million for
Bush's presidential campaign as his national finance chairman.
Although NIST was chosen by Bush to investigate the collapses, the agency
reportedly launched its two-year study "partly in response to the complaints of
victims' groups." Victims' families and fire engineers have been especially
critical of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) report released April
30. The FEMA report was faulted for failing to include input from survivors of
the attacks. NIST officials say they plan to interview survivors about the final
moments before the tower collapses.
The 10-month delay in starting a forensic investigation was criticized by Glen
Corbett, a professor in the fire-engineering department of New York's John Jay
College. Corbett said that the proposed investigation "is the type of
large-scale forensic inquiry that the federal government should have launched
back in September."
During the public meeting, experts addressed inadequate fireproofing and other
fire safety problems in high-rise buildings. "The fire service has seen a
consistent weakening in fire safety," said Vincent Dunn, a retired New York City
fire chief and fire safety consultant. He described climbing through buildings
after fires and finding "nothing left up there but bent warped, twisted steel.
There's no spray-on [fireproofing] left."
"After nine months, after knocking on the doors of elected officials...we are
finally here today," said Sally Regenhard, founder of the Skyscraper Safety
Campaign and mother of Christian Regenhard, one of the many firefighters who
perished on 9-11. "Apparently the problem of inadequacy in fireproofing is not
something new."
Victims' families said they hope to prevent others from suffering the same
grief. "I can't tell you what it's like for a mother to see that building hit,
knowing your child is in the building," Mary Fetchet told the Washington Post.
"We're all at risk today....I do not want 3,000 people to lose their lives and
have it be in vain." She lost her son Brad, 24, in the World Trade Center.
"The data obtained from people from videotape, and from phone calls is critical
to the investigation. Please don't let this crucial information slip through our
fingers," said Monica Gabrielle, on the founders of Skyscraper Safety Campaign.
"We do not want a repeat of what happened to the WTC evidence." More than 90
percent of the physical evidence from the WTC site has reportedly been destroyed
or recycled. I spoke with Matt Heyman, a NIST spokesman, who said the agency
has only 70 pieces of steel to examine. Heyman added that the NIST investigation
will be based on the FEMA report.
"Occupant accounts should be gathered on the fire and damage that was seen,"
said James Quintiere, from the Department of Fire Protection engineering at the
University of Maryland. "That type of information is essential."
"Videos and photographs need to be reviewed. This is a very intensive effort
that needs to be undertaken," said Quintiere, adding, "There is an allusion to a
New York police helicopter that had videos, and I don't think anyone in this
investigative effort has been privy to those yet."
VIDEO EVIDENCE CENSORED
Some of the essential video footage and photographs that have been kept from the
American public and investigators are those made by European media outlets,
which clearly point to explosions in the towers. Numerous survivors fleeing
from the burning towers have described massive explosions on camera. Such
firsthand reports are essential pieces of evidence that cannot be ignored.
There is footage from eyewitness interviews in which survivors describe
explosions inside the buildings. Heyman said there had been "no" mention of any
evidence of explosions during the meeting. When asked if NIST would investigate
the alleged explosions, Heyman said the bureau would look at "anything that
contributed to the collapse of the buildings."
"On the eighth floor we were blown back by a huge explosion," a black American
in a dust-covered business suit told Denmark's DR-TV on 9-11. Another survivor
wearing a red shirt told Germany's SAT1: "There was a big explosion creating a
lot of panic, after that we calmed down, and got out of the towers." In another
SAT1 interview, Tom Canaban tells the German journalist: "There was a big
explosion but I managed to get out of the tower." Within seconds two FBI agents
stepped in front of the TV camera, asked Canaban to stop the interview and
escorted him away.
Several firefighters also reported explosions in the towers. One fireman on
camera said he witnessed a "heavy duty explosion." Veteran firefighter Louie
Cacchioli, 51, told People magazine: "I was taking firefighters up in the
elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last
trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."
Oddly enough, this writer was criticized in November by the Anti-Defamation
League of B'nai B'rith, a Zionist pressure group, for my article, "Eyewitness
Reports Persist of Bombs at WTC Collapse" in which nothing was mentioned about
Jews or Israel other than the fact that one of the WTC architects lives in
Israel.
Careful analysis of the footage from the collapse of the first tower indicates
explosive blasts occurring 5-10 stories below the collapsing section, as if
timed detonations brought the tower down in a controlled demolition. These
horizontal blasts, like those seen at the base of the towers, have not been
explained.
An unexplained crater occurred in the center of WTC 6. WTC 7, which housed
offices of the CIA, collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon of Sept. 11.
Fire engineers are baffled about what caused steel beans in WTC 7 to vaporize
and the 47-story building to collapse.
An amateur video of the second plane hitting the south tower, shown on Danish
TV2's "22 Fokus" on 19 September 2001, shows a laser beam-like spot moving
across the west facade of the tower immediately before the plane crashes into
it. The spot, which some experts believe is evidence of a laser guidance system,
moves from left to right before the plane strikes the tower slightly lower and
to the right of the dot.